硬膜下引流口系统(SEPS)和脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Vinay Jaikumar, Jaims Lim, Patrick Wahlig, Matthew K Moser, Julia Rupp, Marissa D Kruk, Muhammad Waqas, Devan Patel, Alexander G Fritz, Andre Monteiro, Hamid Sharif Khan, Tyler A Scullen, Mehdi Bouslama, Kunal P Raygor, Pui Man Rosalind Lai, Kenneth V Snyder, Elad I Levy, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui
{"title":"硬膜下引流口系统(SEPS)和脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效。","authors":"Vinay Jaikumar, Jaims Lim, Patrick Wahlig, Matthew K Moser, Julia Rupp, Marissa D Kruk, Muhammad Waqas, Devan Patel, Alexander G Fritz, Andre Monteiro, Hamid Sharif Khan, Tyler A Scullen, Mehdi Bouslama, Kunal P Raygor, Pui Man Rosalind Lai, Kenneth V Snyder, Elad I Levy, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui","doi":"10.1177/15910199251342309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPerforming a craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in elderly patients with comorbidities can be challenging. The Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) offers a less-invasive alternative, while middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has shown effectiveness in preventing cSDH recurrence. However, the combined effectiveness of SEPS and MMAE (SEPS + MMAE) remains unclear. This study reports the outcomes of patients undergoing a combination of these procedures for the treatment of cSDH.MethodsA retrospective review of our medical records database was conducted to identify patients with cSDH who were treated with SEPS + MMAE between January 1, 2021, and April 1, 2024. Demographics, comorbidities, procedure, and outcomes data were analyzed. cSDH resolution was tracked by measuring hematoma volumes on noncontrast computed tomography scans pre-SEPS + MMAE, 24-48 h postprocedure, and 6-8 weeks postprocedure.ResultsA total of 35 patients (median age: 77 years [interquartile range (IQR):69-85.5]; men:woman = 22:13) with 49 cSDH, of which 41 cSDHs receiving combined SEPS + MMAE were included. Notably, 38 (92.7%) of the 41 cSDHs were holohemispheric, and 15 (36.6%) had an acute or subacute component. The median pre-SEPS + MMAE cSDH volume was 121.9 mL [IQR:87.9-153.4 mL] with a median midline shift of 6.6 mm [IQR:3.5-10 mm]. All MMAE procedures were performed under conscious sedation. The femoral approach was utilized in 19 patients (54.3%). Three patients required rescue craniotomy. Median post-SPES + MMAE volume was 71.1 mL [IQR:54.5-93.2], resulting in a 38% [IQR:21.9-53] reduction in cSDH volume; and median follow-up SEPS + MMAE volume was 22 mL [IQR:2-59.2] resulting in an 81% [IQR:50.9-98.1] reduction in cSDH volume, compared to pre-SEPS + MMAE levels. Seven (17.1%) patients required readmission for residual or recurrent cSDH within 90 days. Five of these patients were retreated (12.2%), two of whom required craniotomy (4.9%).ConclusionOur experience suggests that SEPS + MMAE was an effective method of cSDH treatment and was associated with low complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251342309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of subdural evacuating port system (SEPS) and middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematomas.\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Jaikumar, Jaims Lim, Patrick Wahlig, Matthew K Moser, Julia Rupp, Marissa D Kruk, Muhammad Waqas, Devan Patel, Alexander G Fritz, Andre Monteiro, Hamid Sharif Khan, Tyler A Scullen, Mehdi Bouslama, Kunal P Raygor, Pui Man Rosalind Lai, Kenneth V Snyder, Elad I Levy, Jason M Davies, Adnan H Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251342309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPerforming a craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in elderly patients with comorbidities can be challenging. The Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) offers a less-invasive alternative, while middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has shown effectiveness in preventing cSDH recurrence. However, the combined effectiveness of SEPS and MMAE (SEPS + MMAE) remains unclear. This study reports the outcomes of patients undergoing a combination of these procedures for the treatment of cSDH.MethodsA retrospective review of our medical records database was conducted to identify patients with cSDH who were treated with SEPS + MMAE between January 1, 2021, and April 1, 2024. Demographics, comorbidities, procedure, and outcomes data were analyzed. cSDH resolution was tracked by measuring hematoma volumes on noncontrast computed tomography scans pre-SEPS + MMAE, 24-48 h postprocedure, and 6-8 weeks postprocedure.ResultsA total of 35 patients (median age: 77 years [interquartile range (IQR):69-85.5]; men:woman = 22:13) with 49 cSDH, of which 41 cSDHs receiving combined SEPS + MMAE were included. Notably, 38 (92.7%) of the 41 cSDHs were holohemispheric, and 15 (36.6%) had an acute or subacute component. The median pre-SEPS + MMAE cSDH volume was 121.9 mL [IQR:87.9-153.4 mL] with a median midline shift of 6.6 mm [IQR:3.5-10 mm]. All MMAE procedures were performed under conscious sedation. The femoral approach was utilized in 19 patients (54.3%). Three patients required rescue craniotomy. Median post-SPES + MMAE volume was 71.1 mL [IQR:54.5-93.2], resulting in a 38% [IQR:21.9-53] reduction in cSDH volume; and median follow-up SEPS + MMAE volume was 22 mL [IQR:2-59.2] resulting in an 81% [IQR:50.9-98.1] reduction in cSDH volume, compared to pre-SEPS + MMAE levels. Seven (17.1%) patients required readmission for residual or recurrent cSDH within 90 days. Five of these patients were retreated (12.2%), two of whom required craniotomy (4.9%).ConclusionOur experience suggests that SEPS + MMAE was an effective method of cSDH treatment and was associated with low complication rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251342309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251342309\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251342309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对合并合并症的老年患者进行慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)开颅手术具有挑战性。硬膜下疏散系统;美敦力公司(Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland)提供了一种侵入性较小的替代方案,而脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)已显示出预防cSDH复发的有效性。然而,SEPS和MMAE (SEPS + MMAE)的联合疗效尚不清楚。本研究报告了接受这些手术组合治疗cSDH的患者的结果。方法回顾性分析我们的病历数据库,以确定在2021年1月1日至2024年4月1日期间接受SEPS + MMAE治疗的cSDH患者。对人口统计学、合并症、手术和结局数据进行分析。通过在seps + MMAE前、术后24-48小时和术后6-8周的非对比计算机断层扫描上测量血肿体积来跟踪cSDH分辨率。结果共35例患者,中位年龄:77岁[四分位数间距(IQR):69-85.5];男性:女性= 22:13)49例cSDH,其中41例cssdh接受SEPS + MMAE联合治疗。值得注意的是,41例cSDHs中有38例(92.7%)为全半球,15例(36.6%)为急性或亚急性成分。seps + MMAE前cSDH中位体积为121.9 mL [IQR:87.9-153.4 mL],中位中线移位6.6 mm [IQR:3.5-10 mm]。所有MMAE手术均在清醒镇静下进行。19例患者(54.3%)采用股骨入路。3例患者需要抢救开颅手术。spes + MMAE后中位容积为71.1 mL [IQR:54.5-93.2],导致cSDH容积减少38% [IQR:21.9-53];随访SEPS + MMAE的中位容积为22 mL [IQR:2-59.2],与SEPS + MMAE前相比,cSDH容积减少81% [IQR:50.9-98.1]。7例(17.1%)患者在90天内因残余或复发性cSDH再次入院。其中5例患者复诊(12.2%),2例需要开颅(4.9%)。结论SEPS + MMAE是治疗cSDH的有效方法,并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of subdural evacuating port system (SEPS) and middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematomas.

BackgroundPerforming a craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in elderly patients with comorbidities can be challenging. The Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) offers a less-invasive alternative, while middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has shown effectiveness in preventing cSDH recurrence. However, the combined effectiveness of SEPS and MMAE (SEPS + MMAE) remains unclear. This study reports the outcomes of patients undergoing a combination of these procedures for the treatment of cSDH.MethodsA retrospective review of our medical records database was conducted to identify patients with cSDH who were treated with SEPS + MMAE between January 1, 2021, and April 1, 2024. Demographics, comorbidities, procedure, and outcomes data were analyzed. cSDH resolution was tracked by measuring hematoma volumes on noncontrast computed tomography scans pre-SEPS + MMAE, 24-48 h postprocedure, and 6-8 weeks postprocedure.ResultsA total of 35 patients (median age: 77 years [interquartile range (IQR):69-85.5]; men:woman = 22:13) with 49 cSDH, of which 41 cSDHs receiving combined SEPS + MMAE were included. Notably, 38 (92.7%) of the 41 cSDHs were holohemispheric, and 15 (36.6%) had an acute or subacute component. The median pre-SEPS + MMAE cSDH volume was 121.9 mL [IQR:87.9-153.4 mL] with a median midline shift of 6.6 mm [IQR:3.5-10 mm]. All MMAE procedures were performed under conscious sedation. The femoral approach was utilized in 19 patients (54.3%). Three patients required rescue craniotomy. Median post-SPES + MMAE volume was 71.1 mL [IQR:54.5-93.2], resulting in a 38% [IQR:21.9-53] reduction in cSDH volume; and median follow-up SEPS + MMAE volume was 22 mL [IQR:2-59.2] resulting in an 81% [IQR:50.9-98.1] reduction in cSDH volume, compared to pre-SEPS + MMAE levels. Seven (17.1%) patients required readmission for residual or recurrent cSDH within 90 days. Five of these patients were retreated (12.2%), two of whom required craniotomy (4.9%).ConclusionOur experience suggests that SEPS + MMAE was an effective method of cSDH treatment and was associated with low complication rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信