{"title":"确定老年急性髓性白血病患者的治疗途径:患者和临床医生的观点。","authors":"Esther N Oliva, Antonio Almeida","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2521397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving remission and prolonging duration of response are the primary treatment objectives for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying the best approach for older patients poses a significant challenge. This review explores the treatment pathways for older patients, especially those not eligible for stem cell transplantation and emphasizes the importance of optimizing outcomes by actively involving patients in their care plans.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>There is currently no clinical consensus on when to use intensive or less-intensive induction chemotherapy for older patients, and more empirical evidence is needed. Meanwhile, this decision must still account for patients' preferences and circumstances in addition to the benefits and risks of therapy. Survey data have shown that patients want to be involved in their treatment decisions and that higher patient engagement improves patient-reported quality of care and satisfaction. While the importance of patient engagement is widely recognized, clinicians can work toward bridging the gap between patients' preferred and perceived levels of involvement in their treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Patient engagement in treatment decisions is particularly important for older patients with AML. Understanding patients' perspectives and expectations for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes is essential to tailoring the most appropriate and effective treatment plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining treatment pathways for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: patient and clinician perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Esther N Oliva, Antonio Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17474086.2025.2521397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving remission and prolonging duration of response are the primary treatment objectives for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying the best approach for older patients poses a significant challenge. This review explores the treatment pathways for older patients, especially those not eligible for stem cell transplantation and emphasizes the importance of optimizing outcomes by actively involving patients in their care plans.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>There is currently no clinical consensus on when to use intensive or less-intensive induction chemotherapy for older patients, and more empirical evidence is needed. Meanwhile, this decision must still account for patients' preferences and circumstances in addition to the benefits and risks of therapy. Survey data have shown that patients want to be involved in their treatment decisions and that higher patient engagement improves patient-reported quality of care and satisfaction. While the importance of patient engagement is widely recognized, clinicians can work toward bridging the gap between patients' preferred and perceived levels of involvement in their treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Patient engagement in treatment decisions is particularly important for older patients with AML. Understanding patients' perspectives and expectations for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes is essential to tailoring the most appropriate and effective treatment plan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2521397\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2521397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determining treatment pathways for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: patient and clinician perspectives.
Introduction: Achieving remission and prolonging duration of response are the primary treatment objectives for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying the best approach for older patients poses a significant challenge. This review explores the treatment pathways for older patients, especially those not eligible for stem cell transplantation and emphasizes the importance of optimizing outcomes by actively involving patients in their care plans.
Areas covered: There is currently no clinical consensus on when to use intensive or less-intensive induction chemotherapy for older patients, and more empirical evidence is needed. Meanwhile, this decision must still account for patients' preferences and circumstances in addition to the benefits and risks of therapy. Survey data have shown that patients want to be involved in their treatment decisions and that higher patient engagement improves patient-reported quality of care and satisfaction. While the importance of patient engagement is widely recognized, clinicians can work toward bridging the gap between patients' preferred and perceived levels of involvement in their treatment decisions.
Expert opinion: Patient engagement in treatment decisions is particularly important for older patients with AML. Understanding patients' perspectives and expectations for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes is essential to tailoring the most appropriate and effective treatment plan.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.