确定老年急性髓性白血病患者的治疗途径:患者和临床医生的观点。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Esther N Oliva, Antonio Almeida
{"title":"确定老年急性髓性白血病患者的治疗途径:患者和临床医生的观点。","authors":"Esther N Oliva, Antonio Almeida","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2521397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving remission and prolonging duration of response are the primary treatment objectives for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying the best approach for older patients poses a significant challenge. This review explores the treatment pathways for older patients, especially those not eligible for stem cell transplantation and emphasizes the importance of optimizing outcomes by actively involving patients in their care plans.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>There is currently no clinical consensus on when to use intensive or less-intensive induction chemotherapy for older patients, and more empirical evidence is needed. Meanwhile, this decision must still account for patients' preferences and circumstances in addition to the benefits and risks of therapy. Survey data have shown that patients want to be involved in their treatment decisions and that higher patient engagement improves patient-reported quality of care and satisfaction. While the importance of patient engagement is widely recognized, clinicians can work toward bridging the gap between patients' preferred and perceived levels of involvement in their treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Patient engagement in treatment decisions is particularly important for older patients with AML. Understanding patients' perspectives and expectations for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes is essential to tailoring the most appropriate and effective treatment plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining treatment pathways for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: patient and clinician perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Esther N Oliva, Antonio Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17474086.2025.2521397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving remission and prolonging duration of response are the primary treatment objectives for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying the best approach for older patients poses a significant challenge. This review explores the treatment pathways for older patients, especially those not eligible for stem cell transplantation and emphasizes the importance of optimizing outcomes by actively involving patients in their care plans.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>There is currently no clinical consensus on when to use intensive or less-intensive induction chemotherapy for older patients, and more empirical evidence is needed. Meanwhile, this decision must still account for patients' preferences and circumstances in addition to the benefits and risks of therapy. Survey data have shown that patients want to be involved in their treatment decisions and that higher patient engagement improves patient-reported quality of care and satisfaction. While the importance of patient engagement is widely recognized, clinicians can work toward bridging the gap between patients' preferred and perceived levels of involvement in their treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Patient engagement in treatment decisions is particularly important for older patients with AML. Understanding patients' perspectives and expectations for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes is essential to tailoring the most appropriate and effective treatment plan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2521397\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2521397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现缓解和延长反应时间是急性髓性白血病(AML)患者的主要治疗目标。然而,确定老年患者的最佳方法是一项重大挑战。这篇综述探讨了老年患者的治疗途径,特别是那些不适合干细胞移植的患者,并强调了通过积极让患者参与他们的护理计划来优化结果的重要性。涉及领域:目前对于老年患者何时使用高强度或低强度诱导化疗尚无临床共识,需要更多的经验证据。同时,除了治疗的益处和风险之外,这个决定还必须考虑患者的偏好和情况。调查数据显示,患者希望参与他们的治疗决策,更高的患者参与度可以提高患者报告的护理质量和满意度。虽然患者参与的重要性已得到广泛认可,但临床医生可以努力弥合患者在治疗决策中的首选参与程度和感知参与程度之间的差距。专家意见:患者参与治疗决策对老年AML患者尤为重要。了解患者对临床和生活质量结果的看法和期望对于制定最合适和最有效的治疗计划至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining treatment pathways for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: patient and clinician perspectives.

Introduction: Achieving remission and prolonging duration of response are the primary treatment objectives for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, identifying the best approach for older patients poses a significant challenge. This review explores the treatment pathways for older patients, especially those not eligible for stem cell transplantation and emphasizes the importance of optimizing outcomes by actively involving patients in their care plans.

Areas covered: There is currently no clinical consensus on when to use intensive or less-intensive induction chemotherapy for older patients, and more empirical evidence is needed. Meanwhile, this decision must still account for patients' preferences and circumstances in addition to the benefits and risks of therapy. Survey data have shown that patients want to be involved in their treatment decisions and that higher patient engagement improves patient-reported quality of care and satisfaction. While the importance of patient engagement is widely recognized, clinicians can work toward bridging the gap between patients' preferred and perceived levels of involvement in their treatment decisions.

Expert opinion: Patient engagement in treatment decisions is particularly important for older patients with AML. Understanding patients' perspectives and expectations for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes is essential to tailoring the most appropriate and effective treatment plan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信