{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病,生物制剂和小分子:我们站在哪里?","authors":"Carlo Lombardi, Francesco Menzella","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2522266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. A subset of patients exhibits eosinophilic inflammation, which has been shown to impact disease severity and exacerbation frequency.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review aims to provide an update on the role of eosinophils in COPD and the efficacy of biologics targeting inflammation. Furthermore, we will explore eosinophilia as a biomarker for COPD outcomes. The findings highlight the potential of biologics in managing COPD. We conducted a review of the English-language literature from the beginning of the databases reviewed through April 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In COPD there is a close interplay between inflammation, lung damage and multimorbidities, mechanisms that determine a lower efficacy of biologics. Patients currently eligible for biologics are only the subpopulation with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but biologics that target broad-acting epithelial cytokines might have a greater efficacy in a complex disease such as COPD. This is because their mechanism of action is not limited to modulation of eosinophilic inflammation alone but to multiple driver pathways. Looking forward, there is an urgent need to identify new biomarkers for better patient selection to improve the impact of biologics, which is still not yet fully satisfactory.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"909-919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, biological agents and small molecules: where do we stand?\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Lombardi, Francesco Menzella\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2522266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. A subset of patients exhibits eosinophilic inflammation, which has been shown to impact disease severity and exacerbation frequency.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review aims to provide an update on the role of eosinophils in COPD and the efficacy of biologics targeting inflammation. Furthermore, we will explore eosinophilia as a biomarker for COPD outcomes. The findings highlight the potential of biologics in managing COPD. We conducted a review of the English-language literature from the beginning of the databases reviewed through April 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In COPD there is a close interplay between inflammation, lung damage and multimorbidities, mechanisms that determine a lower efficacy of biologics. Patients currently eligible for biologics are only the subpopulation with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but biologics that target broad-acting epithelial cytokines might have a greater efficacy in a complex disease such as COPD. This is because their mechanism of action is not limited to modulation of eosinophilic inflammation alone but to multiple driver pathways. Looking forward, there is an urgent need to identify new biomarkers for better patient selection to improve the impact of biologics, which is still not yet fully satisfactory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"909-919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2522266\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2522266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, biological agents and small molecules: where do we stand?
Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation. A subset of patients exhibits eosinophilic inflammation, which has been shown to impact disease severity and exacerbation frequency.
Areas covered: This review aims to provide an update on the role of eosinophils in COPD and the efficacy of biologics targeting inflammation. Furthermore, we will explore eosinophilia as a biomarker for COPD outcomes. The findings highlight the potential of biologics in managing COPD. We conducted a review of the English-language literature from the beginning of the databases reviewed through April 2025.
Expert opinion: In COPD there is a close interplay between inflammation, lung damage and multimorbidities, mechanisms that determine a lower efficacy of biologics. Patients currently eligible for biologics are only the subpopulation with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but biologics that target broad-acting epithelial cytokines might have a greater efficacy in a complex disease such as COPD. This is because their mechanism of action is not limited to modulation of eosinophilic inflammation alone but to multiple driver pathways. Looking forward, there is an urgent need to identify new biomarkers for better patient selection to improve the impact of biologics, which is still not yet fully satisfactory.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.