{"title":"4赫兹以下的视觉刺激,而不是10赫兹,产生人脑最高振幅的频率标记反应:了解刺激频率的影响。","authors":"Talia L Retter, Christine Schiltz","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In frequency tagging, visual stimulation at a frequency (F) of ∼10 Hz has long been known to generate the highest-amplitude response at <i>F</i> in the frequency domain over the human occipital cortex with electroencephalogram and other high temporal-resolution methods. Brain responses are indeed commonly assessed simply at <i>F</i> (i.e., the first harmonic = 1<i>F</i>), under the assumption that the response is represented at a single frequency, i.e., \"steady-state\" or approximately sinusoidal in terms of amplitude over time. This condition is met at stimulus presentation frequencies above ∼4-8 Hz in the visual modality; consequently, frequency tagging has often been limited to F above this \"floor.\" Here, we support a less-common perspective, that frequency-tagged responses do not need to be steady-state, such that slower F are valid. In this case, it has been shown that is not appropriate to measure nonsinusoidal responses at only <i>F</i> but that nonsinusoidal responses can still be analyzed simply and advantageously in the frequency domain through baseline-corrected amplitude summation across harmonics (<i>F</i> <i>+</i> 2<i>F</i> <i>+</i> 3<i>F</i>… = <i>F</i> <sub>s</sub>). Critically, we demonstrate that although the highest-amplitude <i>F</i> response occurs at F = 10 Hz, the highest-amplitude <i>F</i> <sub>s</sub> response occurs at approximately F < 4 Hz. We use this example toward understanding the effect of stimulation frequency on response amplitude and discuss its caveats and limitations. We address what defines an \"optimal\" stimulation frequency (note: it may not always be the F yielding the highest-amplitude response) and reflect on considerations when choosing a stimulation frequency in different contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.\",\"authors\":\"Talia L Retter, Christine Schiltz\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In frequency tagging, visual stimulation at a frequency (F) of ∼10 Hz has long been known to generate the highest-amplitude response at <i>F</i> in the frequency domain over the human occipital cortex with electroencephalogram and other high temporal-resolution methods. Brain responses are indeed commonly assessed simply at <i>F</i> (i.e., the first harmonic = 1<i>F</i>), under the assumption that the response is represented at a single frequency, i.e., \\\"steady-state\\\" or approximately sinusoidal in terms of amplitude over time. This condition is met at stimulus presentation frequencies above ∼4-8 Hz in the visual modality; consequently, frequency tagging has often been limited to F above this \\\"floor.\\\" Here, we support a less-common perspective, that frequency-tagged responses do not need to be steady-state, such that slower F are valid. In this case, it has been shown that is not appropriate to measure nonsinusoidal responses at only <i>F</i> but that nonsinusoidal responses can still be analyzed simply and advantageously in the frequency domain through baseline-corrected amplitude summation across harmonics (<i>F</i> <i>+</i> 2<i>F</i> <i>+</i> 3<i>F</i>… = <i>F</i> <sub>s</sub>). Critically, we demonstrate that although the highest-amplitude <i>F</i> response occurs at F = 10 Hz, the highest-amplitude <i>F</i> <sub>s</sub> response occurs at approximately F < 4 Hz. We use this example toward understanding the effect of stimulation frequency on response amplitude and discuss its caveats and limitations. We address what defines an \\\"optimal\\\" stimulation frequency (note: it may not always be the F yielding the highest-amplitude response) and reflect on considerations when choosing a stimulation frequency in different contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeuro\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177708/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.
In frequency tagging, visual stimulation at a frequency (F) of ∼10 Hz has long been known to generate the highest-amplitude response at F in the frequency domain over the human occipital cortex with electroencephalogram and other high temporal-resolution methods. Brain responses are indeed commonly assessed simply at F (i.e., the first harmonic = 1F), under the assumption that the response is represented at a single frequency, i.e., "steady-state" or approximately sinusoidal in terms of amplitude over time. This condition is met at stimulus presentation frequencies above ∼4-8 Hz in the visual modality; consequently, frequency tagging has often been limited to F above this "floor." Here, we support a less-common perspective, that frequency-tagged responses do not need to be steady-state, such that slower F are valid. In this case, it has been shown that is not appropriate to measure nonsinusoidal responses at only F but that nonsinusoidal responses can still be analyzed simply and advantageously in the frequency domain through baseline-corrected amplitude summation across harmonics (F+ 2F+ 3F… = Fs). Critically, we demonstrate that although the highest-amplitude F response occurs at F = 10 Hz, the highest-amplitude Fs response occurs at approximately F < 4 Hz. We use this example toward understanding the effect of stimulation frequency on response amplitude and discuss its caveats and limitations. We address what defines an "optimal" stimulation frequency (note: it may not always be the F yielding the highest-amplitude response) and reflect on considerations when choosing a stimulation frequency in different contexts.
期刊介绍:
An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.