4赫兹以下的视觉刺激,而不是10赫兹,产生人脑最高振幅的频率标记反应:了解刺激频率的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-06-17 Print Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025
Talia L Retter, Christine Schiltz
{"title":"4赫兹以下的视觉刺激,而不是10赫兹,产生人脑最高振幅的频率标记反应:了解刺激频率的影响。","authors":"Talia L Retter, Christine Schiltz","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In frequency tagging, visual stimulation at a frequency (F) of ∼10 Hz has long been known to generate the highest-amplitude response at <i>F</i> in the frequency domain over the human occipital cortex with electroencephalogram and other high temporal-resolution methods. Brain responses are indeed commonly assessed simply at <i>F</i> (i.e., the first harmonic = 1<i>F</i>), under the assumption that the response is represented at a single frequency, i.e., \"steady-state\" or approximately sinusoidal in terms of amplitude over time. This condition is met at stimulus presentation frequencies above ∼4-8 Hz in the visual modality; consequently, frequency tagging has often been limited to F above this \"floor.\" Here, we support a less-common perspective, that frequency-tagged responses do not need to be steady-state, such that slower F are valid. In this case, it has been shown that is not appropriate to measure nonsinusoidal responses at only <i>F</i> but that nonsinusoidal responses can still be analyzed simply and advantageously in the frequency domain through baseline-corrected amplitude summation across harmonics (<i>F</i>  <i>+</i> 2<i>F</i>  <i>+</i> 3<i>F</i>… = <i>F</i> <sub>s</sub>). Critically, we demonstrate that although the highest-amplitude <i>F</i> response occurs at F = 10 Hz, the highest-amplitude <i>F</i> <sub>s</sub> response occurs at approximately F < 4 Hz. We use this example toward understanding the effect of stimulation frequency on response amplitude and discuss its caveats and limitations. We address what defines an \"optimal\" stimulation frequency (note: it may not always be the F yielding the highest-amplitude response) and reflect on considerations when choosing a stimulation frequency in different contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.\",\"authors\":\"Talia L Retter, Christine Schiltz\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In frequency tagging, visual stimulation at a frequency (F) of ∼10 Hz has long been known to generate the highest-amplitude response at <i>F</i> in the frequency domain over the human occipital cortex with electroencephalogram and other high temporal-resolution methods. Brain responses are indeed commonly assessed simply at <i>F</i> (i.e., the first harmonic = 1<i>F</i>), under the assumption that the response is represented at a single frequency, i.e., \\\"steady-state\\\" or approximately sinusoidal in terms of amplitude over time. This condition is met at stimulus presentation frequencies above ∼4-8 Hz in the visual modality; consequently, frequency tagging has often been limited to F above this \\\"floor.\\\" Here, we support a less-common perspective, that frequency-tagged responses do not need to be steady-state, such that slower F are valid. In this case, it has been shown that is not appropriate to measure nonsinusoidal responses at only <i>F</i> but that nonsinusoidal responses can still be analyzed simply and advantageously in the frequency domain through baseline-corrected amplitude summation across harmonics (<i>F</i>  <i>+</i> 2<i>F</i>  <i>+</i> 3<i>F</i>… = <i>F</i> <sub>s</sub>). Critically, we demonstrate that although the highest-amplitude <i>F</i> response occurs at F = 10 Hz, the highest-amplitude <i>F</i> <sub>s</sub> response occurs at approximately F < 4 Hz. We use this example toward understanding the effect of stimulation frequency on response amplitude and discuss its caveats and limitations. We address what defines an \\\"optimal\\\" stimulation frequency (note: it may not always be the F yielding the highest-amplitude response) and reflect on considerations when choosing a stimulation frequency in different contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeuro\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177708/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0426-24.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在频率标记中,长期以来,人们已经知道,在脑电图和其他高时间分辨率方法中,频率(F)为~ 10 Hz的视觉刺激在人类枕叶皮层的频域F处产生最高振幅响应。实际上,大脑反应通常被简单地评估为F(即,第一次谐波= 1F),假设反应以单一频率表示,即“稳态”或随时间变化的振幅近似正弦。在视觉模态中,刺激呈现频率高于~ 4-8 Hz时满足这一条件;因此,频率标记通常被限制在这个“下限”以上的F。这里,我们支持一种不太常见的观点,即频率标记的响应不需要是稳态的,因此较慢的F是有效的。在这种情况下,已经表明,仅在F处测量非正弦响应是不合适的,但在频域中,通过跨谐波的基线校正幅度求和(F + 2F + 3F…= F s),仍然可以简单而有利地分析非正弦响应。关键的是,我们证明了尽管最高振幅F响应发生在F = 10 Hz,但最高振幅F响应发生在F附近
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.

Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.

Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.

Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.

In frequency tagging, visual stimulation at a frequency (F) of ∼10 Hz has long been known to generate the highest-amplitude response at F in the frequency domain over the human occipital cortex with electroencephalogram and other high temporal-resolution methods. Brain responses are indeed commonly assessed simply at F (i.e., the first harmonic = 1F), under the assumption that the response is represented at a single frequency, i.e., "steady-state" or approximately sinusoidal in terms of amplitude over time. This condition is met at stimulus presentation frequencies above ∼4-8 Hz in the visual modality; consequently, frequency tagging has often been limited to F above this "floor." Here, we support a less-common perspective, that frequency-tagged responses do not need to be steady-state, such that slower F are valid. In this case, it has been shown that is not appropriate to measure nonsinusoidal responses at only F but that nonsinusoidal responses can still be analyzed simply and advantageously in the frequency domain through baseline-corrected amplitude summation across harmonics (F+ 2F+ 3F… = F s). Critically, we demonstrate that although the highest-amplitude F response occurs at F = 10 Hz, the highest-amplitude F s response occurs at approximately F < 4 Hz. We use this example toward understanding the effect of stimulation frequency on response amplitude and discuss its caveats and limitations. We address what defines an "optimal" stimulation frequency (note: it may not always be the F yielding the highest-amplitude response) and reflect on considerations when choosing a stimulation frequency in different contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信