生活实验室开启了关于奶牛和猪部门抗生素使用的对话——基于参与式行动研究的丹麦案例研究的见解。

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Mette Vaarst, Merete Studnitz, Mogens Agerbo Krogh, Hanne Kongsted
{"title":"生活实验室开启了关于奶牛和猪部门抗生素使用的对话——基于参与式行动研究的丹麦案例研究的见解。","authors":"Mette Vaarst, Merete Studnitz, Mogens Agerbo Krogh, Hanne Kongsted","doi":"10.1186/s13028-025-00816-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prudent antimicrobial use (AMU) is paramount for future sustainable animal production. Continuous efforts are required to have a low and well-regulated AMU. Living Labs (LLs) are multistakeholder open innovation platforms that have the potential to allow multiple stakeholders to explore common ground, create dialogues and find solutions to jointly identified problems. The purpose of this study was to stimulate multistakeholder dialogues leading to transitions towards a more prudent AMU in the Danish dairy and pig sectors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two LLs, which focused on pig farms and dairy cattle farms, worked in parallel for 30 months. Stakeholders in the pig and dairy sectors pointed to systemic structures such as logistic conditions and global market structures as the main drivers of the current AMU. Both LLs expressed conflicting interests and perceptions around the concept of prudent AMU related to animal welfare and today's production systems. Thus, the LLs in the Danish context became spaces for opening dialogues and negotiating difficult and sensitive issues in addition to being open-innovation platforms. Both LLs expressed scepticism around the connections between AMU in animal farming and the global threat of antimicrobial resistance to humans. However, this scepticism was more dominant for the stakeholders of the pig sector. The feeling of being a global front-runner in prudent AMU, legislation and transparent monitoring of AMU existed in both sectors, but both LLs identified possibilities and room for improvement. The need to reduce AMU was most consistently articulated in the dairy cattle LL, where the stakeholders increasingly focused on calves from dairy farms and the systemic drivers, which made it challenging to reduce AMU. Some actors in the pig LL kept questioning whether a change towards more prudent AMU was needed in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LL approach fostered important dialogues and insights between central stakeholders in the sectors and was thereby helpful in terms of opening and contributing to dialogues about antibiotic usage in dairy cattle and pigs within and across sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7181,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","volume":"67 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Living labs opened dialogues about antibiotic use in dairy cattle and pig sectors - Insights from a Danish case study based on participatory action research.\",\"authors\":\"Mette Vaarst, Merete Studnitz, Mogens Agerbo Krogh, Hanne Kongsted\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13028-025-00816-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prudent antimicrobial use (AMU) is paramount for future sustainable animal production. Continuous efforts are required to have a low and well-regulated AMU. Living Labs (LLs) are multistakeholder open innovation platforms that have the potential to allow multiple stakeholders to explore common ground, create dialogues and find solutions to jointly identified problems. The purpose of this study was to stimulate multistakeholder dialogues leading to transitions towards a more prudent AMU in the Danish dairy and pig sectors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two LLs, which focused on pig farms and dairy cattle farms, worked in parallel for 30 months. Stakeholders in the pig and dairy sectors pointed to systemic structures such as logistic conditions and global market structures as the main drivers of the current AMU. Both LLs expressed conflicting interests and perceptions around the concept of prudent AMU related to animal welfare and today's production systems. Thus, the LLs in the Danish context became spaces for opening dialogues and negotiating difficult and sensitive issues in addition to being open-innovation platforms. Both LLs expressed scepticism around the connections between AMU in animal farming and the global threat of antimicrobial resistance to humans. However, this scepticism was more dominant for the stakeholders of the pig sector. The feeling of being a global front-runner in prudent AMU, legislation and transparent monitoring of AMU existed in both sectors, but both LLs identified possibilities and room for improvement. The need to reduce AMU was most consistently articulated in the dairy cattle LL, where the stakeholders increasingly focused on calves from dairy farms and the systemic drivers, which made it challenging to reduce AMU. Some actors in the pig LL kept questioning whether a change towards more prudent AMU was needed in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LL approach fostered important dialogues and insights between central stakeholders in the sectors and was thereby helpful in terms of opening and contributing to dialogues about antibiotic usage in dairy cattle and pigs within and across sectors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-025-00816-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-025-00816-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:谨慎使用抗菌素(AMU)对未来可持续的动物生产至关重要。要建立一个低水平、规范良好的国际货币基金组织,需要不断努力。Living Labs (LLs)是多利益相关者的开放式创新平台,有可能让多个利益相关者探索共同点,建立对话并找到解决共同发现的问题的解决方案。本研究的目的是促进多方利益相关者对话,从而在丹麦乳制品和养猪业向更谨慎的AMU过渡。结果:以猪场和奶牛场为重点的两个ll并行工作了30个月。生猪和乳制品行业的利益相关者指出,物流条件和全球市场结构等系统性结构是当前AMU的主要驱动因素。两家法律研究所都表达了与动物福利和当今生产系统相关的谨慎的AMU概念的相互冲突的利益和看法。因此,除了成为开放式创新平台外,丹麦的法律工作室还成为开放对话和谈判困难和敏感问题的空间。两家法学家都对动物养殖中的AMU与人类抗微生物药物耐药性的全球威胁之间的联系表示怀疑。然而,这种怀疑态度在养猪业的利益相关者中更为普遍。在审慎的非货币交易、立法和透明的非货币交易监督方面,这两个行业都有全球领跑者的感觉,但两家法律公司都发现了改进的可能性和空间。减少AMU的需求在奶牛LL中得到了最一致的阐述,其中利益相关者越来越关注奶牛场的小牛和系统驱动因素,这使得减少AMU具有挑战性。《小猪总动员》中的一些演员一直在质疑丹麦是否需要向更谨慎的AMU转变。结论:LL方法促进了各部门核心利益相关者之间的重要对话和见解,从而有助于在部门内部和跨部门开展和促进有关奶牛和猪抗生素使用的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Living labs opened dialogues about antibiotic use in dairy cattle and pig sectors - Insights from a Danish case study based on participatory action research.

Background: Prudent antimicrobial use (AMU) is paramount for future sustainable animal production. Continuous efforts are required to have a low and well-regulated AMU. Living Labs (LLs) are multistakeholder open innovation platforms that have the potential to allow multiple stakeholders to explore common ground, create dialogues and find solutions to jointly identified problems. The purpose of this study was to stimulate multistakeholder dialogues leading to transitions towards a more prudent AMU in the Danish dairy and pig sectors.

Results: The two LLs, which focused on pig farms and dairy cattle farms, worked in parallel for 30 months. Stakeholders in the pig and dairy sectors pointed to systemic structures such as logistic conditions and global market structures as the main drivers of the current AMU. Both LLs expressed conflicting interests and perceptions around the concept of prudent AMU related to animal welfare and today's production systems. Thus, the LLs in the Danish context became spaces for opening dialogues and negotiating difficult and sensitive issues in addition to being open-innovation platforms. Both LLs expressed scepticism around the connections between AMU in animal farming and the global threat of antimicrobial resistance to humans. However, this scepticism was more dominant for the stakeholders of the pig sector. The feeling of being a global front-runner in prudent AMU, legislation and transparent monitoring of AMU existed in both sectors, but both LLs identified possibilities and room for improvement. The need to reduce AMU was most consistently articulated in the dairy cattle LL, where the stakeholders increasingly focused on calves from dairy farms and the systemic drivers, which made it challenging to reduce AMU. Some actors in the pig LL kept questioning whether a change towards more prudent AMU was needed in Denmark.

Conclusion: The LL approach fostered important dialogues and insights between central stakeholders in the sectors and was thereby helpful in terms of opening and contributing to dialogues about antibiotic usage in dairy cattle and pigs within and across sectors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica is an open access journal encompassing all aspects of veterinary research and medicine of domestic and wild animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信