难治性食管静脉曲张的治疗策略

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70155
Keita Maki, Hiroaki Haga, Yoshiyuki Ueno
{"title":"难治性食管静脉曲张的治疗策略","authors":"Keita Maki,&nbsp;Hiroaki Haga,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Ueno","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Refractory esophageal varices that are difficult to control or unresponsive to endoscopic treatment remain a major clinical challenge in the management of portal hypertension. This review provides a comprehensive overview of treatment strategies for these cases, along with a comparative analysis of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Baveno VII, and Japanese clinical practice guidelines. Treatment approaches are classified into four domains: endoscopic therapy, interventional radiology (IVR), surgical procedures, and internal medicine-based strategies. In recent years, clinical practice has shifted from traditional surgical interventions and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to minimally invasive IVR techniques, such as partial splenic embolization, percutaneous transhepatic obliteration, and transileocolic vein obliteration, often combined with endoscopic methods. In Japan, where TIPS is not routinely performed due to limited availability and lack of insurance coverage, these alternative IVR procedures are more commonly utilized. Differences among regional guidelines highlight the need for adaptable treatment strategies based on local resources and institutional expertise. Effective management of refractory cases requires multidisciplinary collaboration among gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons. This review emphasizes the importance of integrating international evidence with local clinical practice to develop a tailored, team-based approach that improves outcomes in patients with complex variceal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management Strategies for Refractory Esophageal Varices\",\"authors\":\"Keita Maki,&nbsp;Hiroaki Haga,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Ueno\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Refractory esophageal varices that are difficult to control or unresponsive to endoscopic treatment remain a major clinical challenge in the management of portal hypertension. This review provides a comprehensive overview of treatment strategies for these cases, along with a comparative analysis of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Baveno VII, and Japanese clinical practice guidelines. Treatment approaches are classified into four domains: endoscopic therapy, interventional radiology (IVR), surgical procedures, and internal medicine-based strategies. In recent years, clinical practice has shifted from traditional surgical interventions and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to minimally invasive IVR techniques, such as partial splenic embolization, percutaneous transhepatic obliteration, and transileocolic vein obliteration, often combined with endoscopic methods. In Japan, where TIPS is not routinely performed due to limited availability and lack of insurance coverage, these alternative IVR procedures are more commonly utilized. Differences among regional guidelines highlight the need for adaptable treatment strategies based on local resources and institutional expertise. Effective management of refractory cases requires multidisciplinary collaboration among gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons. This review emphasizes the importance of integrating international evidence with local clinical practice to develop a tailored, team-based approach that improves outcomes in patients with complex variceal disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70155\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

难治性食管静脉曲张难以控制或对内镜治疗无反应仍然是门静脉高压治疗的主要临床挑战。本综述对这些病例的治疗策略进行了全面概述,并对美国肝病研究协会、Baveno VII和日本临床实践指南进行了比较分析。治疗方法分为四个领域:内窥镜治疗、介入放射学(IVR)、外科手术和基于内科的策略。近年来,临床实践已从传统的手术干预和经颈静脉肝内门静脉分流术(TIPS)转向微创IVR技术,如部分脾栓塞、经皮经肝闭塞、经回肠结肠静脉闭塞,并常与内镜方法相结合。在日本,由于有限的可用性和缺乏保险,TIPS并没有被常规执行,这些替代的IVR程序更常用。区域指南之间的差异突出表明需要根据当地资源和机构专门知识制定适应性强的治疗战略。难治性病例的有效管理需要胃肠病学家、介入放射科医生和外科医生之间的多学科合作。这篇综述强调了将国际证据与当地临床实践相结合的重要性,以开发一种定制的、基于团队的方法,改善复杂静脉曲张疾病患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management Strategies for Refractory Esophageal Varices

Refractory esophageal varices that are difficult to control or unresponsive to endoscopic treatment remain a major clinical challenge in the management of portal hypertension. This review provides a comprehensive overview of treatment strategies for these cases, along with a comparative analysis of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Baveno VII, and Japanese clinical practice guidelines. Treatment approaches are classified into four domains: endoscopic therapy, interventional radiology (IVR), surgical procedures, and internal medicine-based strategies. In recent years, clinical practice has shifted from traditional surgical interventions and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to minimally invasive IVR techniques, such as partial splenic embolization, percutaneous transhepatic obliteration, and transileocolic vein obliteration, often combined with endoscopic methods. In Japan, where TIPS is not routinely performed due to limited availability and lack of insurance coverage, these alternative IVR procedures are more commonly utilized. Differences among regional guidelines highlight the need for adaptable treatment strategies based on local resources and institutional expertise. Effective management of refractory cases requires multidisciplinary collaboration among gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons. This review emphasizes the importance of integrating international evidence with local clinical practice to develop a tailored, team-based approach that improves outcomes in patients with complex variceal disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信