危机怀孕咨询在爱尔兰堕胎法自由化后的作用是什么?

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Éadaoin M. Butler, Meg Ryan, Kate Antosik-Parsons, Frédérique Vallières, Catherine Conlon
{"title":"危机怀孕咨询在爱尔兰堕胎法自由化后的作用是什么?","authors":"Éadaoin M. Butler,&nbsp;Meg Ryan,&nbsp;Kate Antosik-Parsons,&nbsp;Frédérique Vallières,&nbsp;Catherine Conlon","doi":"10.1002/capr.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims/Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Regulation of Information (Services Outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Act 1995 stipulated that information about abortion services available outside Ireland had to be provided in the context of one-to-one counselling alongside information about parenting and adoption. Provision of this information fell largely to crisis pregnancy counselling (CPC) services. However, little attention has been paid to the role of CPC since the liberalisation of Irish abortion law in 2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design/Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The present study entails secondary analysis of data gathered from two qualitative interview-based studies (one with 58 people accessing abortion care in Ireland post-2019 and one with seven counsellors with experience of providing CPC pre- and post-2019) and asks ‘What is the role of CPC in Ireland post-liberalisation of Irish abortion law?’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The accounts of CPC providers demonstrated a belief that public perception of the service was that it was solely related to abortion. People accessing abortion care viewed CPC as primarily associated with decision-making support, support largely perceived as unnecessary. Nonetheless, they also identified value in CPC both for themselves and others. Perspectives on future directions for CPC were offered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While counsellors view CPC as having moved away from pregnancy resolution decision-making, this perception remains prevalent among abortion service users. Greater public awareness efforts are required to communicate to potential service users that CPC is client-led, and not solely focused on abortion-related decision-making. Stronger referral systems between community-based CPC services and hospital-based abortion care are needed. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Role of Crisis Pregnancy Counselling in Ireland Post-Liberalisation of Abortion Law?\",\"authors\":\"Éadaoin M. Butler,&nbsp;Meg Ryan,&nbsp;Kate Antosik-Parsons,&nbsp;Frédérique Vallières,&nbsp;Catherine Conlon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/capr.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims/Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Regulation of Information (Services Outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Act 1995 stipulated that information about abortion services available outside Ireland had to be provided in the context of one-to-one counselling alongside information about parenting and adoption. Provision of this information fell largely to crisis pregnancy counselling (CPC) services. However, little attention has been paid to the role of CPC since the liberalisation of Irish abortion law in 2019.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design/Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The present study entails secondary analysis of data gathered from two qualitative interview-based studies (one with 58 people accessing abortion care in Ireland post-2019 and one with seven counsellors with experience of providing CPC pre- and post-2019) and asks ‘What is the role of CPC in Ireland post-liberalisation of Irish abortion law?’.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The accounts of CPC providers demonstrated a belief that public perception of the service was that it was solely related to abortion. People accessing abortion care viewed CPC as primarily associated with decision-making support, support largely perceived as unnecessary. Nonetheless, they also identified value in CPC both for themselves and others. Perspectives on future directions for CPC were offered.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While counsellors view CPC as having moved away from pregnancy resolution decision-making, this perception remains prevalent among abortion service users. Greater public awareness efforts are required to communicate to potential service users that CPC is client-led, and not solely focused on abortion-related decision-making. Stronger referral systems between community-based CPC services and hospital-based abortion care are needed. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.70029\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/背景1995年《信息管理(国外终止妊娠服务)法》规定,关于爱尔兰境外提供的堕胎服务的信息必须在一对一咨询的范围内提供,同时还必须提供关于养育子女和收养子女的信息。提供这方面信息的主要是怀孕危机咨询服务。然而,自2019年爱尔兰堕胎法自由化以来,中共的作用很少受到关注。设计/方法本研究需要对两项基于定性访谈的研究收集的数据进行二次分析(一项研究有58人在2019年后在爱尔兰接受堕胎护理,另一项研究有7名具有2019年前后提供CPC经验的顾问),并询问“爱尔兰堕胎法自由化后,CPC在爱尔兰的作用是什么?”。结果CPC提供者的陈述表明,公众对该服务的看法是它仅与堕胎有关。接受堕胎护理的人认为CPC主要与决策支持有关,而支持在很大程度上被认为是不必要的。尽管如此,他们也发现了CPC对自己和他人的价值。对方案协调会的未来方向提出了展望。虽然咨询师认为CPC已经远离了怀孕决议决策,但这种看法在堕胎服务使用者中仍然普遍存在。需要加大公众意识的努力,向潜在的服务用户传达CPC是以客户为主导的,而不仅仅是关注与堕胎有关的决策。需要加强社区CPC服务和医院流产护理之间的转诊制度。对政策和实践的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the Role of Crisis Pregnancy Counselling in Ireland Post-Liberalisation of Abortion Law?

Aims/Background

The Regulation of Information (Services Outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Act 1995 stipulated that information about abortion services available outside Ireland had to be provided in the context of one-to-one counselling alongside information about parenting and adoption. Provision of this information fell largely to crisis pregnancy counselling (CPC) services. However, little attention has been paid to the role of CPC since the liberalisation of Irish abortion law in 2019.

Design/Methods

The present study entails secondary analysis of data gathered from two qualitative interview-based studies (one with 58 people accessing abortion care in Ireland post-2019 and one with seven counsellors with experience of providing CPC pre- and post-2019) and asks ‘What is the role of CPC in Ireland post-liberalisation of Irish abortion law?’.

Results

The accounts of CPC providers demonstrated a belief that public perception of the service was that it was solely related to abortion. People accessing abortion care viewed CPC as primarily associated with decision-making support, support largely perceived as unnecessary. Nonetheless, they also identified value in CPC both for themselves and others. Perspectives on future directions for CPC were offered.

Conclusion

While counsellors view CPC as having moved away from pregnancy resolution decision-making, this perception remains prevalent among abortion service users. Greater public awareness efforts are required to communicate to potential service users that CPC is client-led, and not solely focused on abortion-related decision-making. Stronger referral systems between community-based CPC services and hospital-based abortion care are needed. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信