山地自行车运动损伤机制:534例系统视频分析

S. Bonte, C. Hartweg, A. Thouzé, E. Marcaggi, M. Dupuis, N. Graillon, P.-J. Arnoux, L. Thollon, N. Bailly
{"title":"山地自行车运动损伤机制:534例系统视频分析","authors":"S. Bonte,&nbsp;C. Hartweg,&nbsp;A. Thouzé,&nbsp;E. Marcaggi,&nbsp;M. Dupuis,&nbsp;N. Graillon,&nbsp;P.-J. Arnoux,&nbsp;L. Thollon,&nbsp;N. Bailly","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growing popularity of mountain biking is associated with a rapid rise in injuries. Understanding the main crash scenarios is essential for improving preventive and protective measures. This study aimed to describe crash scenarios, fall kinematics, and injury mechanisms using a large video database of traumatic mountain bike crashes. A qualitative analysis was performed on 534 traumatic crash videos from a mountain biking social network. Data recorded included rider information, terrain description, cause of crashes, crash scenario, rider kinematics upon ground impact and injury. When possible, the rider's speed before the crash was measured. Among the 534 videos analysed, six specific crash scenarios were identified: forward over-the-bars (55.2%), forward on-the-bars (9.2%), sideways ejection (12.2%), sideways sliding (10.9%), collision (9.4%) and backward fall (3.2%). In the main scenario, ‘over-the-bars’, riders are thrown over the handlebars due to sudden deceleration, often occurring on moderate descents (53.2%) and following poor jump landings (64.4%) at speeds exceeding 30 km/h (75.3%). Tumbles were the most common impact type on the ground (64.7%), with shoulder girdle (39.7%) and upper limbs (35.6%) injuries predominating. An association between impact type on the ground and injury location was found. The mean recorded speed before the crash was 33.7 km/h, which is higher than previously reported MTB speeds. This study is the first to systematically analyse MTB accident videos, providing crucial insights to better understand full crash kinematics and help design effective protective equipment, optimize trail design, and enhance prevention campaigns on MTB slopes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12327","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injury Mechanisms in Mountain Biking: A Systematic Video Analysis of 534 Cases\",\"authors\":\"S. Bonte,&nbsp;C. Hartweg,&nbsp;A. Thouzé,&nbsp;E. Marcaggi,&nbsp;M. Dupuis,&nbsp;N. Graillon,&nbsp;P.-J. Arnoux,&nbsp;L. Thollon,&nbsp;N. Bailly\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The growing popularity of mountain biking is associated with a rapid rise in injuries. Understanding the main crash scenarios is essential for improving preventive and protective measures. This study aimed to describe crash scenarios, fall kinematics, and injury mechanisms using a large video database of traumatic mountain bike crashes. A qualitative analysis was performed on 534 traumatic crash videos from a mountain biking social network. Data recorded included rider information, terrain description, cause of crashes, crash scenario, rider kinematics upon ground impact and injury. When possible, the rider's speed before the crash was measured. Among the 534 videos analysed, six specific crash scenarios were identified: forward over-the-bars (55.2%), forward on-the-bars (9.2%), sideways ejection (12.2%), sideways sliding (10.9%), collision (9.4%) and backward fall (3.2%). In the main scenario, ‘over-the-bars’, riders are thrown over the handlebars due to sudden deceleration, often occurring on moderate descents (53.2%) and following poor jump landings (64.4%) at speeds exceeding 30 km/h (75.3%). Tumbles were the most common impact type on the ground (64.7%), with shoulder girdle (39.7%) and upper limbs (35.6%) injuries predominating. An association between impact type on the ground and injury location was found. The mean recorded speed before the crash was 33.7 km/h, which is higher than previously reported MTB speeds. This study is the first to systematically analyse MTB accident videos, providing crucial insights to better understand full crash kinematics and help design effective protective equipment, optimize trail design, and enhance prevention campaigns on MTB slopes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12327\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

山地车的日益普及与受伤的迅速增加有关。了解主要的碰撞场景对于改进预防和保护措施至关重要。本研究旨在描述碰撞场景、坠落运动学和损伤机制,使用大型创伤性山地自行车碰撞视频数据库。本文对来自某山地自行车社交网络的534段创伤性撞车视频进行了定性分析。记录的数据包括骑手信息、地形描述、碰撞原因、碰撞场景、骑手在地面撞击和受伤时的运动学。在可能的情况下,测量骑手在撞车前的速度。在分析的534个视频中,确定了六种特定的碰撞场景:向前越过栏杆(55.2%)、向前越过栏杆(9.2%)、侧身弹射(12.2%)、侧身滑动(10.9%)、碰撞(9.4%)和向后摔倒(3.2%)。在“过杠”的主要情况下,由于突然减速,车手被甩出车把,这种情况经常发生在适度下降(53.2%)和在速度超过30公里/小时(75.3%)时,糟糕的跳跃着陆(64.4%)。摔倒是最常见的地面撞击类型(64.7%),以肩带(39.7%)和上肢(35.6%)损伤为主。在地面上的冲击类型和受伤位置之间发现了关联。事故发生前的平均记录速度为33.7公里/小时,高于此前报道的MTB速度。这项研究首次系统地分析了MTB事故视频,为更好地了解完整的碰撞运动学、帮助设计有效的防护设备、优化车道设计和加强MTB斜坡上的预防活动提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Injury Mechanisms in Mountain Biking: A Systematic Video Analysis of 534 Cases

The growing popularity of mountain biking is associated with a rapid rise in injuries. Understanding the main crash scenarios is essential for improving preventive and protective measures. This study aimed to describe crash scenarios, fall kinematics, and injury mechanisms using a large video database of traumatic mountain bike crashes. A qualitative analysis was performed on 534 traumatic crash videos from a mountain biking social network. Data recorded included rider information, terrain description, cause of crashes, crash scenario, rider kinematics upon ground impact and injury. When possible, the rider's speed before the crash was measured. Among the 534 videos analysed, six specific crash scenarios were identified: forward over-the-bars (55.2%), forward on-the-bars (9.2%), sideways ejection (12.2%), sideways sliding (10.9%), collision (9.4%) and backward fall (3.2%). In the main scenario, ‘over-the-bars’, riders are thrown over the handlebars due to sudden deceleration, often occurring on moderate descents (53.2%) and following poor jump landings (64.4%) at speeds exceeding 30 km/h (75.3%). Tumbles were the most common impact type on the ground (64.7%), with shoulder girdle (39.7%) and upper limbs (35.6%) injuries predominating. An association between impact type on the ground and injury location was found. The mean recorded speed before the crash was 33.7 km/h, which is higher than previously reported MTB speeds. This study is the first to systematically analyse MTB accident videos, providing crucial insights to better understand full crash kinematics and help design effective protective equipment, optimize trail design, and enhance prevention campaigns on MTB slopes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信