国际妇女节品牌帖子的参与:性别与真实性差异的实证分析

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Rafael Bravo, José M. Pina
{"title":"国际妇女节品牌帖子的参与:性别与真实性差异的实证分析","authors":"Rafael Bravo,&nbsp;José M. Pina","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite the rising interest shown in feminist issues in the last decade, brand management research has focused less on feminism than on other social causes. This study analyses the participation of the 100 most valuable brands on Twitter/X in International Women's Day (IWD) from 2014 to 2023. Grounded in theories of social identification, brand gender congruence, and authenticity, we hypothesise variations in brand engagement based on consumer gender, brand type, and message type. Panel data analysis revealed that women engage more actively than men in terms of likes, retweets, and comments, particularly with brands that target them. Contrary to expectations, “authentic” posts received fewer likes and retweets than did “non-authentic”, suggesting that IWD is perceived more as a moment to celebrate and share than a time to discuss real actions or commitment to feminist causes. These findings highlight the need to consider additional factors to understand brand engagement with feminist causes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"49 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engagement With Brand Posts on International Women's Day: An Empirical Analysis of Differences in Gender and Authenticity\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Bravo,&nbsp;José M. Pina\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijcs.70086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Despite the rising interest shown in feminist issues in the last decade, brand management research has focused less on feminism than on other social causes. This study analyses the participation of the 100 most valuable brands on Twitter/X in International Women's Day (IWD) from 2014 to 2023. Grounded in theories of social identification, brand gender congruence, and authenticity, we hypothesise variations in brand engagement based on consumer gender, brand type, and message type. Panel data analysis revealed that women engage more actively than men in terms of likes, retweets, and comments, particularly with brands that target them. Contrary to expectations, “authentic” posts received fewer likes and retweets than did “non-authentic”, suggesting that IWD is perceived more as a moment to celebrate and share than a time to discuss real actions or commitment to feminist causes. These findings highlight the need to consider additional factors to understand brand engagement with feminist causes.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Consumer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70086\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在过去十年中,人们对女权主义问题的兴趣日益浓厚,但品牌管理研究对女权主义的关注比对其他社会原因的关注要少。本研究分析了2014年至2023年国际妇女节期间Twitter/X上100个最有价值品牌的参与情况。在社会认同、品牌性别一致性和真实性理论的基础上,我们假设基于消费者性别、品牌类型和信息类型的品牌参与变化。小组数据分析显示,女性在点赞、转发和评论方面比男性更积极,尤其是针对她们的品牌。与预期相反,“真实”的帖子得到的点赞和转发量比“不真实”的帖子要少,这表明国际妇女节更多地被视为庆祝和分享的时刻,而不是讨论实际行动或对女权主义事业的承诺的时刻。这些发现强调了需要考虑其他因素来理解品牌与女权主义事业的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engagement With Brand Posts on International Women's Day: An Empirical Analysis of Differences in Gender and Authenticity

Despite the rising interest shown in feminist issues in the last decade, brand management research has focused less on feminism than on other social causes. This study analyses the participation of the 100 most valuable brands on Twitter/X in International Women's Day (IWD) from 2014 to 2023. Grounded in theories of social identification, brand gender congruence, and authenticity, we hypothesise variations in brand engagement based on consumer gender, brand type, and message type. Panel data analysis revealed that women engage more actively than men in terms of likes, retweets, and comments, particularly with brands that target them. Contrary to expectations, “authentic” posts received fewer likes and retweets than did “non-authentic”, suggesting that IWD is perceived more as a moment to celebrate and share than a time to discuss real actions or commitment to feminist causes. These findings highlight the need to consider additional factors to understand brand engagement with feminist causes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信