Peter McGarry , Lidia Morawska , Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge , Simon Witts
{"title":"解决室内空间内二氧化碳浓度的实际和社区期望-一种合理可行的方法,使用二氧化碳浓度评估室内空间的通风质量","authors":"Peter McGarry , Lidia Morawska , Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge , Simon Witts","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ability to quickly assess the performance of a ventilation system to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to the space relative to the number of occupants is important as part of the overall goal of ensuring healthy indoor air. Current debate within the scientific community clearly aims to influence government to legislate a CO<sub>2</sub> concentration as an indoor air quality standard. However, to properly consider this, government will likely demand quantitative data on contemporary indoor CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and a tested and reasonably practicable method for use by building occupants. Our study addresses this research gap with the aim of testing and documenting how to operationalise CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring for use by occupants as an infection risk reduction tool within mechanically ventilated spaces. The related research objectives were 1) to inform the current scientific debate on an indoor air CO<sub>2</sub> concentration action level for improved ventilation quality and infection risk control, 2) to pilot and document a method for characterising indoor CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations within occupied spaces serviced by heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and demonstrate it was reasonably practicable in terms of instrument cost and deployment utility, 3) assess the performance of a ventilation systems to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to indoor spaces relative to the number of space occupants, and 4) to action improvements in ventilation quality where identified. The method was informed by a literature review of various standards that described optimal number, location, and layout of sensors, resulting in demonstration of deployment of CO<sub>2</sub> sensors. Sensors were deployed within 1439 teaching and office spaces across 78 mechanically ventilated buildings. In 1025 (72 %) rooms, CO<sub>2</sub> concentration was < 800 ppm, in 267 (18 %) between 800 ppm and 1000 ppm, and in 147 (10 %) > 1000 ppm, during room occupancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing actual and community expectations on CO2 concentrations within indoor spaces – A reasonably practicable methodology using CO2 concentration to assess ventilation quality to indoor spaces\",\"authors\":\"Peter McGarry , Lidia Morawska , Savinda Arambawatta Lekamge , Simon Witts\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ability to quickly assess the performance of a ventilation system to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to the space relative to the number of occupants is important as part of the overall goal of ensuring healthy indoor air. Current debate within the scientific community clearly aims to influence government to legislate a CO<sub>2</sub> concentration as an indoor air quality standard. However, to properly consider this, government will likely demand quantitative data on contemporary indoor CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and a tested and reasonably practicable method for use by building occupants. Our study addresses this research gap with the aim of testing and documenting how to operationalise CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring for use by occupants as an infection risk reduction tool within mechanically ventilated spaces. The related research objectives were 1) to inform the current scientific debate on an indoor air CO<sub>2</sub> concentration action level for improved ventilation quality and infection risk control, 2) to pilot and document a method for characterising indoor CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations within occupied spaces serviced by heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and demonstrate it was reasonably practicable in terms of instrument cost and deployment utility, 3) assess the performance of a ventilation systems to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to indoor spaces relative to the number of space occupants, and 4) to action improvements in ventilation quality where identified. The method was informed by a literature review of various standards that described optimal number, location, and layout of sensors, resulting in demonstration of deployment of CO<sub>2</sub> sensors. Sensors were deployed within 1439 teaching and office spaces across 78 mechanically ventilated buildings. In 1025 (72 %) rooms, CO<sub>2</sub> concentration was < 800 ppm, in 267 (18 %) between 800 ppm and 1000 ppm, and in 147 (10 %) > 1000 ppm, during room occupancy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indoor Environments\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indoor Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295036202500030X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295036202500030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Addressing actual and community expectations on CO2 concentrations within indoor spaces – A reasonably practicable methodology using CO2 concentration to assess ventilation quality to indoor spaces
The ability to quickly assess the performance of a ventilation system to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to the space relative to the number of occupants is important as part of the overall goal of ensuring healthy indoor air. Current debate within the scientific community clearly aims to influence government to legislate a CO2 concentration as an indoor air quality standard. However, to properly consider this, government will likely demand quantitative data on contemporary indoor CO2 concentrations and a tested and reasonably practicable method for use by building occupants. Our study addresses this research gap with the aim of testing and documenting how to operationalise CO2 monitoring for use by occupants as an infection risk reduction tool within mechanically ventilated spaces. The related research objectives were 1) to inform the current scientific debate on an indoor air CO2 concentration action level for improved ventilation quality and infection risk control, 2) to pilot and document a method for characterising indoor CO2 concentrations within occupied spaces serviced by heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and demonstrate it was reasonably practicable in terms of instrument cost and deployment utility, 3) assess the performance of a ventilation systems to deliver an adequate amount of clean air to indoor spaces relative to the number of space occupants, and 4) to action improvements in ventilation quality where identified. The method was informed by a literature review of various standards that described optimal number, location, and layout of sensors, resulting in demonstration of deployment of CO2 sensors. Sensors were deployed within 1439 teaching and office spaces across 78 mechanically ventilated buildings. In 1025 (72 %) rooms, CO2 concentration was < 800 ppm, in 267 (18 %) between 800 ppm and 1000 ppm, and in 147 (10 %) > 1000 ppm, during room occupancy.