评估二手烟草烟雾暴露的维度和领域:来自德尔菲研究的见解

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ana Blanco-Ferreiro , Julia Rey-Brandariz , Jasjit S. Ahluwalia , Leonor Varela-Lema , Iñaki Galán , María Isolina Santiago-Pérez , Xisca Sureda , Marcela Fu , Anna Schiaffino , María José López , Xavier Continente , Cristina Candal-Pedreira , Melinda Mahabee-Gittens , Mónica Pérez-Ríos
{"title":"评估二手烟草烟雾暴露的维度和领域:来自德尔菲研究的见解","authors":"Ana Blanco-Ferreiro ,&nbsp;Julia Rey-Brandariz ,&nbsp;Jasjit S. Ahluwalia ,&nbsp;Leonor Varela-Lema ,&nbsp;Iñaki Galán ,&nbsp;María Isolina Santiago-Pérez ,&nbsp;Xisca Sureda ,&nbsp;Marcela Fu ,&nbsp;Anna Schiaffino ,&nbsp;María José López ,&nbsp;Xavier Continente ,&nbsp;Cristina Candal-Pedreira ,&nbsp;Melinda Mahabee-Gittens ,&nbsp;Mónica Pérez-Ríos","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2025.102508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the dimensions and domains to be included in questionnaires when assessing self-reported secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure in etiological studies and in population health surveys.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A qualitative study was conducted in two stages. In stage one, based on a Delphi methodology, 16 experts in tobacco epidemiology completed two questionnaires and attended a group session. In stage two, triangulation interviews were conducted with six experts from the Delphi study to provided in-depth reflection on the domains identified in stage one. The recorded transcriptions were analyzed using a thematic approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The experts discussed the importance of assessing SHS exposure in specific scenarios, highlighting the home, workplace, leisure venues, and private transport. They discussed the importance of asking about cohabiting with smokers when assessing exposure at home. The experts stressed the importance of differentiating between leisure venues, by prioritizing closed over open spaces. In population-based health surveys, the experts recommended that the recall time should be recent, referring to the last seven days. In etiological studies, they suggested that lifetime exposures should be explored.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study marks the first step toward identifying the dimensions and domains for assessing self-reported SHS exposure. Question standardization when ascertaining SHS exposure is critical to permit cross study comparisons and to analyze trends in the evolution of SHS exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 102508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensions and domains to assess secondhand tobacco smoke exposure: insights from a Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Ana Blanco-Ferreiro ,&nbsp;Julia Rey-Brandariz ,&nbsp;Jasjit S. Ahluwalia ,&nbsp;Leonor Varela-Lema ,&nbsp;Iñaki Galán ,&nbsp;María Isolina Santiago-Pérez ,&nbsp;Xisca Sureda ,&nbsp;Marcela Fu ,&nbsp;Anna Schiaffino ,&nbsp;María José López ,&nbsp;Xavier Continente ,&nbsp;Cristina Candal-Pedreira ,&nbsp;Melinda Mahabee-Gittens ,&nbsp;Mónica Pérez-Ríos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaceta.2025.102508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the dimensions and domains to be included in questionnaires when assessing self-reported secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure in etiological studies and in population health surveys.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A qualitative study was conducted in two stages. In stage one, based on a Delphi methodology, 16 experts in tobacco epidemiology completed two questionnaires and attended a group session. In stage two, triangulation interviews were conducted with six experts from the Delphi study to provided in-depth reflection on the domains identified in stage one. The recorded transcriptions were analyzed using a thematic approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The experts discussed the importance of assessing SHS exposure in specific scenarios, highlighting the home, workplace, leisure venues, and private transport. They discussed the importance of asking about cohabiting with smokers when assessing exposure at home. The experts stressed the importance of differentiating between leisure venues, by prioritizing closed over open spaces. In population-based health surveys, the experts recommended that the recall time should be recent, referring to the last seven days. In etiological studies, they suggested that lifetime exposures should be explored.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study marks the first step toward identifying the dimensions and domains for assessing self-reported SHS exposure. Question standardization when ascertaining SHS exposure is critical to permit cross study comparisons and to analyze trends in the evolution of SHS exposure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911125000627\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911125000627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定在病原学研究和人口健康调查中评估自我报告的二手烟草烟雾(SHS)暴露时应纳入问卷的维度和领域。方法定性研究分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,根据德尔菲法,16名烟草流行病学专家完成了两份调查表,并参加了一次小组会议。在第二阶段,与来自德尔菲研究的六位专家进行了三角测量访谈,以对第一阶段确定的领域进行深入反思。使用主题方法对记录的转录进行分析。结果专家们讨论了在特定情况下评估SHS暴露的重要性,重点是家庭、工作场所、休闲场所和私人交通工具。他们讨论了在评估家中吸烟情况时询问与吸烟者同居情况的重要性。专家们强调了区分休闲场所的重要性,优先考虑封闭空间而不是开放空间。在以人口为基础的健康调查中,专家建议召回时间应该是最近的,指的是过去7天。在病因学研究中,他们建议应该探索终生暴露。本研究标志着确定自我报告的SHS暴露的维度和领域的第一步。确定SHS暴露时的问题标准化对于允许交叉研究比较和分析SHS暴露演变趋势至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dimensions and domains to assess secondhand tobacco smoke exposure: insights from a Delphi study

Objective

To identify the dimensions and domains to be included in questionnaires when assessing self-reported secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure in etiological studies and in population health surveys.

Method

A qualitative study was conducted in two stages. In stage one, based on a Delphi methodology, 16 experts in tobacco epidemiology completed two questionnaires and attended a group session. In stage two, triangulation interviews were conducted with six experts from the Delphi study to provided in-depth reflection on the domains identified in stage one. The recorded transcriptions were analyzed using a thematic approach.

Results

The experts discussed the importance of assessing SHS exposure in specific scenarios, highlighting the home, workplace, leisure venues, and private transport. They discussed the importance of asking about cohabiting with smokers when assessing exposure at home. The experts stressed the importance of differentiating between leisure venues, by prioritizing closed over open spaces. In population-based health surveys, the experts recommended that the recall time should be recent, referring to the last seven days. In etiological studies, they suggested that lifetime exposures should be explored.

Conclusions

This study marks the first step toward identifying the dimensions and domains for assessing self-reported SHS exposure. Question standardization when ascertaining SHS exposure is critical to permit cross study comparisons and to analyze trends in the evolution of SHS exposure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gaceta Sanitaria
Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信