探索自动驾驶系统中标准化行为能力的潜力

IF 1.8 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Georg Stettinger , Patrick Weissensteiner , Nayel Fabian Salem , Marcus Nolte , Siddartha Khastgir
{"title":"探索自动驾驶系统中标准化行为能力的潜力","authors":"Georg Stettinger ,&nbsp;Patrick Weissensteiner ,&nbsp;Nayel Fabian Salem ,&nbsp;Marcus Nolte ,&nbsp;Siddartha Khastgir","doi":"10.1016/j.ifacsc.2025.100320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a comprehensive impact assessment to explore the potential benefits of harmonized behaviour competencies (BC) for automated driving systems (ADS). Typically, ADS-equipped vehicles operate within certain boundaries specified by an operational design domain (ODD), utilizing the relevant implemented BCs. Nonetheless, many regulatory and standardization-relevant documents employ BC attributes in a non-harmonized manner. The study delves into BC-related activities and applications throughout the entire ADS life cycle, affecting all aspects of the ADS value chain, to gain a deeper understanding of the diverse needs of various stakeholders. BCs are linked to one of the four primary requirement sources at the system level. ADS-related BCs are defined through a multidisciplinary approach driven by their underlying core operating principle: the well-known sense-plan-act cycle. The crucial element within the BC specification is the identified manoeuvre pool, which forms the basis for implementing any route from point A to point B. The individual manoeuvres within the manoeuvre pool are defined by considering the needs of multiple stakeholders. They are based on three essential components: the initial condition, the expected manoeuvre, and the final condition. Furthermore, trustworthy behaviour competencies are specified, encompassing three pillars: robustness, ethics, and lawfulness. Following a detailed stakeholder analysis, several related applications are discussed to highlight the concrete advantages of implementing standardized BCs. The study concludes with a summary of the impact analysis, emphasizing key findings and action points. Lastly, a roadmap is proposed to integrate trustworthy BCs into future ADS. Concretely, the authors developed the following innovations within the scope of this article: (1) Concept for trustworthy behaviour competencies driven by law, ethics, and robustness. (2) Robustness is defined as passenger &amp; ODD awareness and plannable &amp; executable manoeuvre. (3) Manoeuvre pool necessary to implement an arbitrary route from point A to point B. (4) Manoeuvre specification via initial condition, expected behaviour, and final condition. (5) The potential benefits of harmonized behaviour competencies drive impact assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29926,"journal":{"name":"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 100320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the potential of standardized behaviour competencies in automated driving systems\",\"authors\":\"Georg Stettinger ,&nbsp;Patrick Weissensteiner ,&nbsp;Nayel Fabian Salem ,&nbsp;Marcus Nolte ,&nbsp;Siddartha Khastgir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ifacsc.2025.100320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents a comprehensive impact assessment to explore the potential benefits of harmonized behaviour competencies (BC) for automated driving systems (ADS). Typically, ADS-equipped vehicles operate within certain boundaries specified by an operational design domain (ODD), utilizing the relevant implemented BCs. Nonetheless, many regulatory and standardization-relevant documents employ BC attributes in a non-harmonized manner. The study delves into BC-related activities and applications throughout the entire ADS life cycle, affecting all aspects of the ADS value chain, to gain a deeper understanding of the diverse needs of various stakeholders. BCs are linked to one of the four primary requirement sources at the system level. ADS-related BCs are defined through a multidisciplinary approach driven by their underlying core operating principle: the well-known sense-plan-act cycle. The crucial element within the BC specification is the identified manoeuvre pool, which forms the basis for implementing any route from point A to point B. The individual manoeuvres within the manoeuvre pool are defined by considering the needs of multiple stakeholders. They are based on three essential components: the initial condition, the expected manoeuvre, and the final condition. Furthermore, trustworthy behaviour competencies are specified, encompassing three pillars: robustness, ethics, and lawfulness. Following a detailed stakeholder analysis, several related applications are discussed to highlight the concrete advantages of implementing standardized BCs. The study concludes with a summary of the impact analysis, emphasizing key findings and action points. Lastly, a roadmap is proposed to integrate trustworthy BCs into future ADS. Concretely, the authors developed the following innovations within the scope of this article: (1) Concept for trustworthy behaviour competencies driven by law, ethics, and robustness. (2) Robustness is defined as passenger &amp; ODD awareness and plannable &amp; executable manoeuvre. (3) Manoeuvre pool necessary to implement an arbitrary route from point A to point B. (4) Manoeuvre specification via initial condition, expected behaviour, and final condition. (5) The potential benefits of harmonized behaviour competencies drive impact assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468601825000264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468601825000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个全面的影响评估,以探讨协调行为能力(BC)对自动驾驶系统(ADS)的潜在好处。通常,配备ads系统的车辆在操作设计域(ODD)规定的特定范围内运行,利用相关的实现bc。尽管如此,许多规范性和标准化相关文档以不协调的方式使用BC属性。该研究深入研究了整个ADS生命周期中与bc相关的活动和应用,影响了ADS价值链的各个方面,以更深入地了解不同利益相关者的不同需求。bc与系统级的四个主要需求源之一相关联。与ads相关的bc是通过多学科方法定义的,其基本核心操作原则是:众所周知的感知-计划-行动周期。BC规范中的关键要素是确定的机动池,它构成了实现从A点到b点的任何路线的基础。机动池中的单个机动是通过考虑多个利益相关者的需求来定义的。它们基于三个基本组成部分:初始条件、预期操作和最终条件。此外,值得信赖的行为能力被指定,包括三个支柱:稳健性,道德和合法性。在详细的利益相关者分析之后,讨论了几个相关的应用程序,以突出实现标准化bc的具体优势。该研究总结了影响分析,强调了主要发现和行动要点。最后,提出了将可信赖的bc整合到未来的ADS中的路线图。具体而言,作者在本文的范围内开发了以下创新:(1)由法律、道德和鲁棒性驱动的可信赖行为能力概念。(2)鲁棒性定义为乘客&;ODD意识和计划性;可执行的策略。(3)实现从A点到b点的任意路线所需的机动池。(4)通过初始条件、预期行为和最终条件确定的机动规范。(5)协调行为能力的潜在效益推动了影响评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the potential of standardized behaviour competencies in automated driving systems
This paper presents a comprehensive impact assessment to explore the potential benefits of harmonized behaviour competencies (BC) for automated driving systems (ADS). Typically, ADS-equipped vehicles operate within certain boundaries specified by an operational design domain (ODD), utilizing the relevant implemented BCs. Nonetheless, many regulatory and standardization-relevant documents employ BC attributes in a non-harmonized manner. The study delves into BC-related activities and applications throughout the entire ADS life cycle, affecting all aspects of the ADS value chain, to gain a deeper understanding of the diverse needs of various stakeholders. BCs are linked to one of the four primary requirement sources at the system level. ADS-related BCs are defined through a multidisciplinary approach driven by their underlying core operating principle: the well-known sense-plan-act cycle. The crucial element within the BC specification is the identified manoeuvre pool, which forms the basis for implementing any route from point A to point B. The individual manoeuvres within the manoeuvre pool are defined by considering the needs of multiple stakeholders. They are based on three essential components: the initial condition, the expected manoeuvre, and the final condition. Furthermore, trustworthy behaviour competencies are specified, encompassing three pillars: robustness, ethics, and lawfulness. Following a detailed stakeholder analysis, several related applications are discussed to highlight the concrete advantages of implementing standardized BCs. The study concludes with a summary of the impact analysis, emphasizing key findings and action points. Lastly, a roadmap is proposed to integrate trustworthy BCs into future ADS. Concretely, the authors developed the following innovations within the scope of this article: (1) Concept for trustworthy behaviour competencies driven by law, ethics, and robustness. (2) Robustness is defined as passenger & ODD awareness and plannable & executable manoeuvre. (3) Manoeuvre pool necessary to implement an arbitrary route from point A to point B. (4) Manoeuvre specification via initial condition, expected behaviour, and final condition. (5) The potential benefits of harmonized behaviour competencies drive impact assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信