学业焦虑对男女学生数学和阅读成绩的中介作用:一项对意大利五年级学生的综合研究

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Sara Caviola , David Giofrè , Tommaso Feraco , Enrico Toffalini , Katie Allen , David C. Geary
{"title":"学业焦虑对男女学生数学和阅读成绩的中介作用:一项对意大利五年级学生的综合研究","authors":"Sara Caviola ,&nbsp;David Giofrè ,&nbsp;Tommaso Feraco ,&nbsp;Enrico Toffalini ,&nbsp;Katie Allen ,&nbsp;David C. Geary","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a long-standing debate regarding the magnitude of gender differences in academic achievement. Using data from a robust and nationally representative sample of 146,227 Italian-fifth-graders, we investigated whether academic anxiety is related to gender differences in mathematics and reading achievement. Across six independent samples, boys had higher performance in mathematics (<em>d</em>s = −0.13 to −0.21) and girls had higher performance in reading (<em>d</em>s = 0.07 to 0.21) and higher test anxiety (<em>d</em>s = 0.30 to 0.37). Meta-analytic procedures indicated these patterns were stable across samples. Path analyses within and across samples suggested about one-third of the academic gender gaps can be accounted for by test anxiety. In particular, with control of test anxiety girls' advantage in reading achievement increased, while boys' advantage in mathematics decreased.</div></div><div><h3>Educational statement</h3><div>The current study provides an extensive exploration of how test anxiety potentially influences gender differences in mathematics and reading achievement. Test anxiety appears to lower girls' performance on achievement tests and thus underestimating their advantages in reading and overestimating boys' advantages in mathematics. One implication is that efforts to reduce test anxiety will enhance performance on achievement tests, especially for test-anxious girls, and through this provide more accurate estimates of academic competencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 102726"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the mediating role of academic anxiety in mathematics and reading performance among boys and girls: A comprehensive study of Italian fifth graders\",\"authors\":\"Sara Caviola ,&nbsp;David Giofrè ,&nbsp;Tommaso Feraco ,&nbsp;Enrico Toffalini ,&nbsp;Katie Allen ,&nbsp;David C. Geary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is a long-standing debate regarding the magnitude of gender differences in academic achievement. Using data from a robust and nationally representative sample of 146,227 Italian-fifth-graders, we investigated whether academic anxiety is related to gender differences in mathematics and reading achievement. Across six independent samples, boys had higher performance in mathematics (<em>d</em>s = −0.13 to −0.21) and girls had higher performance in reading (<em>d</em>s = 0.07 to 0.21) and higher test anxiety (<em>d</em>s = 0.30 to 0.37). Meta-analytic procedures indicated these patterns were stable across samples. Path analyses within and across samples suggested about one-third of the academic gender gaps can be accounted for by test anxiety. In particular, with control of test anxiety girls' advantage in reading achievement increased, while boys' advantage in mathematics decreased.</div></div><div><h3>Educational statement</h3><div>The current study provides an extensive exploration of how test anxiety potentially influences gender differences in mathematics and reading achievement. Test anxiety appears to lower girls' performance on achievement tests and thus underestimating their advantages in reading and overestimating boys' advantages in mathematics. One implication is that efforts to reduce test anxiety will enhance performance on achievement tests, especially for test-anxious girls, and through this provide more accurate estimates of academic competencies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,人们一直在争论学业成绩中性别差异的大小。我们使用来自146227名意大利五年级学生的稳健且具有全国代表性的样本数据,调查了学业焦虑是否与数学和阅读成绩的性别差异有关。在六个独立的样本中,男孩在数学方面的表现更高(ds = - 0.13至- 0.21),女孩在阅读方面的表现更高(ds = 0.07至0.21),考试焦虑程度更高(ds = 0.30至0.37)。元分析程序表明,这些模式在样本中是稳定的。样本内部和样本之间的通径分析表明,大约三分之一的学业性别差距可以用考试焦虑来解释。特别是,在考试焦虑的控制下,女孩在阅读成绩上的优势增加,而男孩在数学方面的优势下降。目前的研究对考试焦虑如何潜在地影响数学和阅读成绩的性别差异进行了广泛的探索。考试焦虑似乎降低了女孩在成就测试中的表现,从而低估了她们在阅读方面的优势,高估了男孩在数学方面的优势。其中一个含义是,减少考试焦虑的努力将提高成绩测试的表现,特别是对考试焦虑的女孩,并通过这提供更准确的学术能力估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the mediating role of academic anxiety in mathematics and reading performance among boys and girls: A comprehensive study of Italian fifth graders
There is a long-standing debate regarding the magnitude of gender differences in academic achievement. Using data from a robust and nationally representative sample of 146,227 Italian-fifth-graders, we investigated whether academic anxiety is related to gender differences in mathematics and reading achievement. Across six independent samples, boys had higher performance in mathematics (ds = −0.13 to −0.21) and girls had higher performance in reading (ds = 0.07 to 0.21) and higher test anxiety (ds = 0.30 to 0.37). Meta-analytic procedures indicated these patterns were stable across samples. Path analyses within and across samples suggested about one-third of the academic gender gaps can be accounted for by test anxiety. In particular, with control of test anxiety girls' advantage in reading achievement increased, while boys' advantage in mathematics decreased.

Educational statement

The current study provides an extensive exploration of how test anxiety potentially influences gender differences in mathematics and reading achievement. Test anxiety appears to lower girls' performance on achievement tests and thus underestimating their advantages in reading and overestimating boys' advantages in mathematics. One implication is that efforts to reduce test anxiety will enhance performance on achievement tests, especially for test-anxious girls, and through this provide more accurate estimates of academic competencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信