脱药治疗秃顶:一项实验性混合方法研究

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Josip Razum , Glen S Jankowski , Dirk Kranz
{"title":"脱药治疗秃顶:一项实验性混合方法研究","authors":"Josip Razum ,&nbsp;Glen S Jankowski ,&nbsp;Dirk Kranz","doi":"10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Baldness is a common bodily change most men experience. It is extensively medicalized. Specifically, it is depicted as a negative disease that only a profitable industry’s cosmetic, pharmaceutical and other products can ‘treat’. This study aimed to assess whether a short demedicalization intervention, an evidence-based text of around 400 words, could promote acceptance among balding men. An international sample of 350 balding men completed a mixed-method, experimental, survey. Participants were randomized into 1 of 3 conditions with text that medicalized baldness (presented it as a disadvantageous disease requiring ‘treatment’ akin to anti-baldness advertising), that demedicalized baldness (presented it neutrally in an evidenced-based manner emphasizing informed consent) or with no text (control). Quantitative scale responses indicated lower medicalized coping and higher acceptance coping, but no differences in distress among participants exposed to demedicalized information. The medicalized information did not have an effect on any of the quantitative scales. Participants also qualitatively reported feeling more informed, more accepting, less distressed and less misled in the demedicalized condition than the medicalized condition. Despite negative pressures around baldness, a short demedicalized intervention may be useful to promote more informed, accepting and positive responses to baldness. Such an intervention is scalable and could be distributed easily (e.g., via online articles or videos). Future research should test the feasibility of lengthier interventions to demedicalize baldness and other bodily aspects (e.g., cellulite, genital variation and height).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48312,"journal":{"name":"Body Image","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101926"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demedicalizing baldness: An experimental, mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"Josip Razum ,&nbsp;Glen S Jankowski ,&nbsp;Dirk Kranz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Baldness is a common bodily change most men experience. It is extensively medicalized. Specifically, it is depicted as a negative disease that only a profitable industry’s cosmetic, pharmaceutical and other products can ‘treat’. This study aimed to assess whether a short demedicalization intervention, an evidence-based text of around 400 words, could promote acceptance among balding men. An international sample of 350 balding men completed a mixed-method, experimental, survey. Participants were randomized into 1 of 3 conditions with text that medicalized baldness (presented it as a disadvantageous disease requiring ‘treatment’ akin to anti-baldness advertising), that demedicalized baldness (presented it neutrally in an evidenced-based manner emphasizing informed consent) or with no text (control). Quantitative scale responses indicated lower medicalized coping and higher acceptance coping, but no differences in distress among participants exposed to demedicalized information. The medicalized information did not have an effect on any of the quantitative scales. Participants also qualitatively reported feeling more informed, more accepting, less distressed and less misled in the demedicalized condition than the medicalized condition. Despite negative pressures around baldness, a short demedicalized intervention may be useful to promote more informed, accepting and positive responses to baldness. Such an intervention is scalable and could be distributed easily (e.g., via online articles or videos). Future research should test the feasibility of lengthier interventions to demedicalize baldness and other bodily aspects (e.g., cellulite, genital variation and height).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Body Image\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101926\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Body Image\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144525000774\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144525000774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

秃顶是大多数男人都会经历的一种常见的身体变化。它被广泛地医疗化了。具体来说,它被描述为一种负面疾病,只有盈利行业的化妆品、药品和其他产品才能“治疗”。这项研究旨在评估一个简短的去医学化干预,一个大约400字的基于证据的文本,是否可以促进秃顶男性的接受。350名国际秃顶男子完成了一项混合方法的实验性调查。参与者被随机分为三种情况,一种是医学化秃顶(将其描述为一种需要“治疗”的不利疾病,类似于反秃顶广告),另一种是非医学化秃顶(以基于证据的中立方式强调知情同意),另一种是没有文字(对照组)。定量量表结果显示,非医疗化信息暴露的被试在痛苦程度上没有差异,但医疗化应对水平较低,接受性应对水平较高。医学化的信息对任何定量量表都没有影响。参与者还定性地报告说,在非医疗化条件下,他们比医疗化条件下更了解情况、更接受、更少痛苦和更少被误导。尽管围绕秃顶的负面压力,短期的非药物化干预可能有助于促进更多的知情,接受和积极的秃顶反应。这种干预是可扩展的,可以很容易地分发(例如,通过在线文章或视频)。未来的研究应该测试更长时间干预的可行性,以使秃顶和其他身体方面(如脂肪团、生殖器变异和身高)去医学化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demedicalizing baldness: An experimental, mixed methods study
Baldness is a common bodily change most men experience. It is extensively medicalized. Specifically, it is depicted as a negative disease that only a profitable industry’s cosmetic, pharmaceutical and other products can ‘treat’. This study aimed to assess whether a short demedicalization intervention, an evidence-based text of around 400 words, could promote acceptance among balding men. An international sample of 350 balding men completed a mixed-method, experimental, survey. Participants were randomized into 1 of 3 conditions with text that medicalized baldness (presented it as a disadvantageous disease requiring ‘treatment’ akin to anti-baldness advertising), that demedicalized baldness (presented it neutrally in an evidenced-based manner emphasizing informed consent) or with no text (control). Quantitative scale responses indicated lower medicalized coping and higher acceptance coping, but no differences in distress among participants exposed to demedicalized information. The medicalized information did not have an effect on any of the quantitative scales. Participants also qualitatively reported feeling more informed, more accepting, less distressed and less misled in the demedicalized condition than the medicalized condition. Despite negative pressures around baldness, a short demedicalized intervention may be useful to promote more informed, accepting and positive responses to baldness. Such an intervention is scalable and could be distributed easily (e.g., via online articles or videos). Future research should test the feasibility of lengthier interventions to demedicalize baldness and other bodily aspects (e.g., cellulite, genital variation and height).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Body Image
Body Image Multiple-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
28.80%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Body Image is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, scientific articles on body image and human physical appearance. Body Image is a multi-faceted concept that refers to persons perceptions and attitudes about their own body, particularly but not exclusively its appearance. The journal invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines-psychological science, other social and behavioral sciences, and medical and health sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, theoretical and review papers, and science-based practitioner reports of interest. Dissertation abstracts are also published online, and the journal gives an annual award for the best doctoral dissertation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信