观察性队列研究探索MediEmo智能手机应用程序使用,活产和体外受精治疗回复率

Isla F. Robertson D.M. , China R. Harrison Ph.D. , Richard D. Morey Ph.D. , Jacky Boivin Ph.D. , Ying Cheong D.M.
{"title":"观察性队列研究探索MediEmo智能手机应用程序使用,活产和体外受精治疗回复率","authors":"Isla F. Robertson D.M. ,&nbsp;China R. Harrison Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Richard D. Morey Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jacky Boivin Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Ying Cheong D.M.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the associations between the use of the MediEmo smartphone application and in vitro fertilization (IVF) live birth and treatment return rates.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A 3-year observational cohort study</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Patients undergoing IVF were classified as users if they used the medication or emotion features of the MediEmo. Patients who did not use the two key features or declined to use the application were classified as nonusers.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>The use of the MediEmo smartphone application.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Outcomes of interest were the rate of live birth per fresh index cycle, live birth per complete cycle, and treatment return for a stimulated cycle of treatment within 12 months of the unsuccessful stimulated index cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,081 patients were eligible to use the MediEmo application, 863 were categorized as users and 218 as nonusers. MediEmo use was associated with a higher live birth rate per index cycle than nonusers (27.81% [n = 240/863] vs. 19.26% [n = 42/218], respectively, OR, 1.248; 95% CI, 1.041–1.509) and treatment return rate compared with nonusers (46.00% [n = 169/363] vs. 31.37% [n = 32/102], respectively, OR, 1.339; 95% CI, 1.092–1.656). It was not associated with the live birth rate per complete cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The observed positive association between MediEmo use and live birth and treatment return rates suggests benefits to patients and clinics. Further research and replication using a randomized controlled trial design are warranted, as is investment in the development of digital tools for use during IVF treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational cohort study exploring MediEmo smartphone application use, live birth, and in vitro fertilization treatment return rates\",\"authors\":\"Isla F. Robertson D.M. ,&nbsp;China R. Harrison Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Richard D. Morey Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Jacky Boivin Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Ying Cheong D.M.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfre.2025.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the associations between the use of the MediEmo smartphone application and in vitro fertilization (IVF) live birth and treatment return rates.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A 3-year observational cohort study</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Patients undergoing IVF were classified as users if they used the medication or emotion features of the MediEmo. Patients who did not use the two key features or declined to use the application were classified as nonusers.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>The use of the MediEmo smartphone application.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Outcomes of interest were the rate of live birth per fresh index cycle, live birth per complete cycle, and treatment return for a stimulated cycle of treatment within 12 months of the unsuccessful stimulated index cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,081 patients were eligible to use the MediEmo application, 863 were categorized as users and 218 as nonusers. MediEmo use was associated with a higher live birth rate per index cycle than nonusers (27.81% [n = 240/863] vs. 19.26% [n = 42/218], respectively, OR, 1.248; 95% CI, 1.041–1.509) and treatment return rate compared with nonusers (46.00% [n = 169/363] vs. 31.37% [n = 32/102], respectively, OR, 1.339; 95% CI, 1.092–1.656). It was not associated with the live birth rate per complete cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The observed positive association between MediEmo use and live birth and treatment return rates suggests benefits to patients and clinics. Further research and replication using a randomized controlled trial design are warranted, as is investment in the development of digital tools for use during IVF treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FS Reports\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 159-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FS Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334125000625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334125000625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨MediEmo智能手机应用程序的使用与体外受精(IVF)活产和治疗回复率的关系。设计:一项为期3年的观察性队列研究受试者:接受体外受精的患者如果使用MediEmo的药物或情绪特征,则被归类为使用者。不使用这两个关键功能或拒绝使用应用程序的患者被归类为非用户。MediEmo智能手机应用程序的使用。主要结局指标感兴趣的结局是每个新鲜指数周期的活产率,每个完整周期的活产率,以及在刺激指数周期失败后12个月内进行刺激周期治疗的治疗返回。结果共有1081例患者符合使用MediEmo应用程序的条件,其中863例为用户,218例为非用户。使用MediEmo与每个指标周期的活产率比不使用MediEmo相关(分别为27.81% [n = 240/863]对19.26% [n = 42/218], OR为1.248;95% CI, 1.041-1.509)和治疗回收率(46.00% [n = 169/363] vs. 31.37% [n = 32/102]), OR为1.339;95% ci, 1.092-1.656)。它与每个完整周期的活产率无关。结论MediEmo的使用与活产率和治疗回复率呈正相关,对患者和诊所都有好处。使用随机对照试验设计进行进一步的研究和复制是有必要的,同时也需要投资开发用于试管婴儿治疗的数字工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observational cohort study exploring MediEmo smartphone application use, live birth, and in vitro fertilization treatment return rates

Objective

To explore the associations between the use of the MediEmo smartphone application and in vitro fertilization (IVF) live birth and treatment return rates.

Design

A 3-year observational cohort study

Subjects

Patients undergoing IVF were classified as users if they used the medication or emotion features of the MediEmo. Patients who did not use the two key features or declined to use the application were classified as nonusers.

Exposure

The use of the MediEmo smartphone application.

Main outcome measures

Outcomes of interest were the rate of live birth per fresh index cycle, live birth per complete cycle, and treatment return for a stimulated cycle of treatment within 12 months of the unsuccessful stimulated index cycle.

Results

A total of 1,081 patients were eligible to use the MediEmo application, 863 were categorized as users and 218 as nonusers. MediEmo use was associated with a higher live birth rate per index cycle than nonusers (27.81% [n = 240/863] vs. 19.26% [n = 42/218], respectively, OR, 1.248; 95% CI, 1.041–1.509) and treatment return rate compared with nonusers (46.00% [n = 169/363] vs. 31.37% [n = 32/102], respectively, OR, 1.339; 95% CI, 1.092–1.656). It was not associated with the live birth rate per complete cycle.

Conclusion

The observed positive association between MediEmo use and live birth and treatment return rates suggests benefits to patients and clinics. Further research and replication using a randomized controlled trial design are warranted, as is investment in the development of digital tools for use during IVF treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信