Isla F. Robertson D.M. , China R. Harrison Ph.D. , Richard D. Morey Ph.D. , Jacky Boivin Ph.D. , Ying Cheong D.M.
{"title":"观察性队列研究探索MediEmo智能手机应用程序使用,活产和体外受精治疗回复率","authors":"Isla F. Robertson D.M. , China R. Harrison Ph.D. , Richard D. Morey Ph.D. , Jacky Boivin Ph.D. , Ying Cheong D.M.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the associations between the use of the MediEmo smartphone application and in vitro fertilization (IVF) live birth and treatment return rates.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A 3-year observational cohort study</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Patients undergoing IVF were classified as users if they used the medication or emotion features of the MediEmo. Patients who did not use the two key features or declined to use the application were classified as nonusers.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>The use of the MediEmo smartphone application.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Outcomes of interest were the rate of live birth per fresh index cycle, live birth per complete cycle, and treatment return for a stimulated cycle of treatment within 12 months of the unsuccessful stimulated index cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,081 patients were eligible to use the MediEmo application, 863 were categorized as users and 218 as nonusers. MediEmo use was associated with a higher live birth rate per index cycle than nonusers (27.81% [n = 240/863] vs. 19.26% [n = 42/218], respectively, OR, 1.248; 95% CI, 1.041–1.509) and treatment return rate compared with nonusers (46.00% [n = 169/363] vs. 31.37% [n = 32/102], respectively, OR, 1.339; 95% CI, 1.092–1.656). It was not associated with the live birth rate per complete cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The observed positive association between MediEmo use and live birth and treatment return rates suggests benefits to patients and clinics. Further research and replication using a randomized controlled trial design are warranted, as is investment in the development of digital tools for use during IVF treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational cohort study exploring MediEmo smartphone application use, live birth, and in vitro fertilization treatment return rates\",\"authors\":\"Isla F. Robertson D.M. , China R. Harrison Ph.D. , Richard D. Morey Ph.D. , Jacky Boivin Ph.D. , Ying Cheong D.M.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfre.2025.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the associations between the use of the MediEmo smartphone application and in vitro fertilization (IVF) live birth and treatment return rates.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A 3-year observational cohort study</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Patients undergoing IVF were classified as users if they used the medication or emotion features of the MediEmo. Patients who did not use the two key features or declined to use the application were classified as nonusers.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>The use of the MediEmo smartphone application.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Outcomes of interest were the rate of live birth per fresh index cycle, live birth per complete cycle, and treatment return for a stimulated cycle of treatment within 12 months of the unsuccessful stimulated index cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1,081 patients were eligible to use the MediEmo application, 863 were categorized as users and 218 as nonusers. MediEmo use was associated with a higher live birth rate per index cycle than nonusers (27.81% [n = 240/863] vs. 19.26% [n = 42/218], respectively, OR, 1.248; 95% CI, 1.041–1.509) and treatment return rate compared with nonusers (46.00% [n = 169/363] vs. 31.37% [n = 32/102], respectively, OR, 1.339; 95% CI, 1.092–1.656). It was not associated with the live birth rate per complete cycle.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The observed positive association between MediEmo use and live birth and treatment return rates suggests benefits to patients and clinics. Further research and replication using a randomized controlled trial design are warranted, as is investment in the development of digital tools for use during IVF treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FS Reports\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 159-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FS Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334125000625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334125000625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Observational cohort study exploring MediEmo smartphone application use, live birth, and in vitro fertilization treatment return rates
Objective
To explore the associations between the use of the MediEmo smartphone application and in vitro fertilization (IVF) live birth and treatment return rates.
Design
A 3-year observational cohort study
Subjects
Patients undergoing IVF were classified as users if they used the medication or emotion features of the MediEmo. Patients who did not use the two key features or declined to use the application were classified as nonusers.
Exposure
The use of the MediEmo smartphone application.
Main outcome measures
Outcomes of interest were the rate of live birth per fresh index cycle, live birth per complete cycle, and treatment return for a stimulated cycle of treatment within 12 months of the unsuccessful stimulated index cycle.
Results
A total of 1,081 patients were eligible to use the MediEmo application, 863 were categorized as users and 218 as nonusers. MediEmo use was associated with a higher live birth rate per index cycle than nonusers (27.81% [n = 240/863] vs. 19.26% [n = 42/218], respectively, OR, 1.248; 95% CI, 1.041–1.509) and treatment return rate compared with nonusers (46.00% [n = 169/363] vs. 31.37% [n = 32/102], respectively, OR, 1.339; 95% CI, 1.092–1.656). It was not associated with the live birth rate per complete cycle.
Conclusion
The observed positive association between MediEmo use and live birth and treatment return rates suggests benefits to patients and clinics. Further research and replication using a randomized controlled trial design are warranted, as is investment in the development of digital tools for use during IVF treatment.