在体外受精中引入灵活胚胎评估的延时:对评分信心和工作流程效率的影响

Alicia Picou M.S. , Kelly Athayde Wirka D.H.Sc. , Allison Baxter Catherino Ph.D. , Brooke Hayward S.M. , Matthew David VerMilyea Ph.D.
{"title":"在体外受精中引入灵活胚胎评估的延时:对评分信心和工作流程效率的影响","authors":"Alicia Picou M.S. ,&nbsp;Kelly Athayde Wirka D.H.Sc. ,&nbsp;Allison Baxter Catherino Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Brooke Hayward S.M. ,&nbsp;Matthew David VerMilyea Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare embryologists’ confidence levels and grading concordance when assessing embryo morphology using time-lapse images vs. traditional direct observation under a microscope.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Six embryologists on staff at the laboratory who ranged from junior to senior skillset levels.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Embryologists’ confidence levels in morphology assessments, intraobserver agreement for embryo grading, and assessment duration when using time-lapse images compared with direct observation under microscopes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 6,435 morphology assessments across 714 embryos (62 cohorts), high-confidence levels were observed on day 5 for gradings using either direct observation (97.7%) or time-lapse images (94.6%), with no statistically significant difference. Confidence was consistently high (&gt;85%) across days 1, 3, 6, and 7, with direct observation having higher confidence rate than time-lapse-based assessment on days 1 and 3. Intraobserver agreement between direct observation vs. time-lapse-based assessment showed good-to-excellent concordance (κ ≥ 0.60) except for blastocyst morphology grade (κ = 0.58). The highest agreement was observed for day 5–7 embryo disposition decisions, with 94.1% concordance (κ = 0.89). Assessment durations were comparable between the two grading methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Embryologists maintained high confidence in morphology assessments using time-lapse systems, even under time constraints. Intraobserver agreement for embryo grading, assessed by comparing the same embryologist’s gradings using time-lapse images vs. direct observation, was comparable to previously reported levels of agreement for traditional morphology gradings. These findings highlight the feasibility of flexible or remote assessments without disrupting embryo culture, enhancing workflow adaptability, and paving the way for advancements with artificial intelligence integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 149-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing time-lapse for flexible embryo assessment in in vitro fertilization: implications for grading confidence and workflow efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Picou M.S. ,&nbsp;Kelly Athayde Wirka D.H.Sc. ,&nbsp;Allison Baxter Catherino Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Brooke Hayward S.M. ,&nbsp;Matthew David VerMilyea Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfre.2025.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare embryologists’ confidence levels and grading concordance when assessing embryo morphology using time-lapse images vs. traditional direct observation under a microscope.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Six embryologists on staff at the laboratory who ranged from junior to senior skillset levels.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Embryologists’ confidence levels in morphology assessments, intraobserver agreement for embryo grading, and assessment duration when using time-lapse images compared with direct observation under microscopes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 6,435 morphology assessments across 714 embryos (62 cohorts), high-confidence levels were observed on day 5 for gradings using either direct observation (97.7%) or time-lapse images (94.6%), with no statistically significant difference. Confidence was consistently high (&gt;85%) across days 1, 3, 6, and 7, with direct observation having higher confidence rate than time-lapse-based assessment on days 1 and 3. Intraobserver agreement between direct observation vs. time-lapse-based assessment showed good-to-excellent concordance (κ ≥ 0.60) except for blastocyst morphology grade (κ = 0.58). The highest agreement was observed for day 5–7 embryo disposition decisions, with 94.1% concordance (κ = 0.89). Assessment durations were comparable between the two grading methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Embryologists maintained high confidence in morphology assessments using time-lapse systems, even under time constraints. Intraobserver agreement for embryo grading, assessed by comparing the same embryologist’s gradings using time-lapse images vs. direct observation, was comparable to previously reported levels of agreement for traditional morphology gradings. These findings highlight the feasibility of flexible or remote assessments without disrupting embryo culture, enhancing workflow adaptability, and paving the way for advancements with artificial intelligence integration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FS Reports\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 149-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FS Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334125000558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334125000558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较胚胎学家在使用延时图像和传统显微镜下直接观察评估胚胎形态时的置信度和分级一致性。DesignProspective研究。研究对象:实验室工作人员中的6名胚胎学家,他们的技能水平从初级到高级不等。主要结果测量胚胎学家在形态学评估方面的信心水平,胚胎分级的观察者内部一致性,以及使用延时图像与在显微镜下直接观察时的评估时间。结果在62个队列的714个胚胎的6435个形态学评估中,在第5天使用直接观察(97.7%)或延时图像(94.6%)进行评分时,观察到高置信度,无统计学差异。在第1天、第3天、第6天和第7天,置信度一直很高(>85%),直接观察比第1天和第3天基于时间推移的评估具有更高的置信度。除囊胚形态分级(κ = 0.58)外,直接观察与基于延时的评估之间的观察者内一致性为良好至优秀(κ≥0.60)。在第5-7天的胚胎处置决定中,一致性最高,一致性为94.1% (κ = 0.89)。两种分级方法的评估时间具有可比性。结论即使在时间限制下,胚胎学家对使用延时系统进行形态学评估仍保持较高的信心。通过比较同一胚胎学家使用延时图像和直接观察的分级,来评估胚胎分级的观察者内一致性,与先前报道的传统形态学分级的一致性水平相当。这些发现强调了在不破坏胚胎培养的情况下进行灵活或远程评估的可行性,增强了工作流程的适应性,并为人工智能集成的进步铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introducing time-lapse for flexible embryo assessment in in vitro fertilization: implications for grading confidence and workflow efficiency

Objective

To compare embryologists’ confidence levels and grading concordance when assessing embryo morphology using time-lapse images vs. traditional direct observation under a microscope.

Design

Prospective study.

Subjects

Six embryologists on staff at the laboratory who ranged from junior to senior skillset levels.

Exposure

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Embryologists’ confidence levels in morphology assessments, intraobserver agreement for embryo grading, and assessment duration when using time-lapse images compared with direct observation under microscopes.

Results

From 6,435 morphology assessments across 714 embryos (62 cohorts), high-confidence levels were observed on day 5 for gradings using either direct observation (97.7%) or time-lapse images (94.6%), with no statistically significant difference. Confidence was consistently high (>85%) across days 1, 3, 6, and 7, with direct observation having higher confidence rate than time-lapse-based assessment on days 1 and 3. Intraobserver agreement between direct observation vs. time-lapse-based assessment showed good-to-excellent concordance (κ ≥ 0.60) except for blastocyst morphology grade (κ = 0.58). The highest agreement was observed for day 5–7 embryo disposition decisions, with 94.1% concordance (κ = 0.89). Assessment durations were comparable between the two grading methods.

Conclusion

Embryologists maintained high confidence in morphology assessments using time-lapse systems, even under time constraints. Intraobserver agreement for embryo grading, assessed by comparing the same embryologist’s gradings using time-lapse images vs. direct observation, was comparable to previously reported levels of agreement for traditional morphology gradings. These findings highlight the feasibility of flexible or remote assessments without disrupting embryo culture, enhancing workflow adaptability, and paving the way for advancements with artificial intelligence integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信