{"title":"整合非点源污染时空变异性与最佳管理实践效率以改善适应性流域管理","authors":"Jiaqi Li, Guowangchen Liu, Zhenyao Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.124042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a major contributor to water quality degradation, non-point source (NPS) pollution exhibits pronounced spatiotemporal variability, posing significant challenges to watershed management under changing hydrological conditions. However, most existing control strategies rely on static assumptions, neglecting dynamic variations in pollutant loading and the performance of best management practices (BMPs) across time and space. This study proposed a new framework to assess the impact of spatiotemporal variability on watershed management, using the Liao River watershed in China as a case study. Copula and Bayesian models were coupled to provide a pollutant load scenario that integrates multiple hydrological conditions for BMPs configuration, capturing the nonlinear relationship between flow and water quality, and the associated uncertainties. Moreover, BMPs efficiency was evaluated using a self-organizing map combined with multiple regression, accounting for dynamic changes across watershed characteristics and operational durations. The results demonstrated that temporal variability in pollutant distribution led to substantial fluctuations in management costs, with a 38.91% increase in dry years and a 23.38% decrease in wet years. The spatial variability expanded the required control area by 25.99% and increased the control cost by 31.98%. The spatiotemporal variation in BMPs efficiency further affected management benefits. A five-year operational period for BMPs yielded the lowest management costs, which were 2.64% and 21.70% lower than those for one-year and ten-year periods. Additionally, spatial variability in BMPs efficiency increased management cost by 15.55%-28.97%. These findings provide quantitative insights to support adaptive BMPs layout under changing environmental conditions, thereby enhancing resilience in watershed management.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating spatiotemporal variability of non-point source pollution and best management practice efficiency to improve adaptive watershed management\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqi Li, Guowangchen Liu, Zhenyao Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.watres.2025.124042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a major contributor to water quality degradation, non-point source (NPS) pollution exhibits pronounced spatiotemporal variability, posing significant challenges to watershed management under changing hydrological conditions. However, most existing control strategies rely on static assumptions, neglecting dynamic variations in pollutant loading and the performance of best management practices (BMPs) across time and space. This study proposed a new framework to assess the impact of spatiotemporal variability on watershed management, using the Liao River watershed in China as a case study. Copula and Bayesian models were coupled to provide a pollutant load scenario that integrates multiple hydrological conditions for BMPs configuration, capturing the nonlinear relationship between flow and water quality, and the associated uncertainties. Moreover, BMPs efficiency was evaluated using a self-organizing map combined with multiple regression, accounting for dynamic changes across watershed characteristics and operational durations. The results demonstrated that temporal variability in pollutant distribution led to substantial fluctuations in management costs, with a 38.91% increase in dry years and a 23.38% decrease in wet years. The spatial variability expanded the required control area by 25.99% and increased the control cost by 31.98%. The spatiotemporal variation in BMPs efficiency further affected management benefits. A five-year operational period for BMPs yielded the lowest management costs, which were 2.64% and 21.70% lower than those for one-year and ten-year periods. Additionally, spatial variability in BMPs efficiency increased management cost by 15.55%-28.97%. These findings provide quantitative insights to support adaptive BMPs layout under changing environmental conditions, thereby enhancing resilience in watershed management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124042\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrating spatiotemporal variability of non-point source pollution and best management practice efficiency to improve adaptive watershed management
As a major contributor to water quality degradation, non-point source (NPS) pollution exhibits pronounced spatiotemporal variability, posing significant challenges to watershed management under changing hydrological conditions. However, most existing control strategies rely on static assumptions, neglecting dynamic variations in pollutant loading and the performance of best management practices (BMPs) across time and space. This study proposed a new framework to assess the impact of spatiotemporal variability on watershed management, using the Liao River watershed in China as a case study. Copula and Bayesian models were coupled to provide a pollutant load scenario that integrates multiple hydrological conditions for BMPs configuration, capturing the nonlinear relationship between flow and water quality, and the associated uncertainties. Moreover, BMPs efficiency was evaluated using a self-organizing map combined with multiple regression, accounting for dynamic changes across watershed characteristics and operational durations. The results demonstrated that temporal variability in pollutant distribution led to substantial fluctuations in management costs, with a 38.91% increase in dry years and a 23.38% decrease in wet years. The spatial variability expanded the required control area by 25.99% and increased the control cost by 31.98%. The spatiotemporal variation in BMPs efficiency further affected management benefits. A five-year operational period for BMPs yielded the lowest management costs, which were 2.64% and 21.70% lower than those for one-year and ten-year periods. Additionally, spatial variability in BMPs efficiency increased management cost by 15.55%-28.97%. These findings provide quantitative insights to support adaptive BMPs layout under changing environmental conditions, thereby enhancing resilience in watershed management.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.