微生物演替模式在分解小鼠尸体的死后间隔估计:机械性窒息和失血性休克的比较研究。

Qin Su, Xingchun Zhao, Xinbiao Liao, Xiaohui Chen, Qingqing Xiang, Yadong Guo, Quyi Xu, Chengdong Ma, Zhilei Chen, Fei Gao, Chao Liu, Jian Zhao
{"title":"微生物演替模式在分解小鼠尸体的死后间隔估计:机械性窒息和失血性休克的比较研究。","authors":"Qin Su, Xingchun Zhao, Xinbiao Liao, Xiaohui Chen, Qingqing Xiang, Yadong Guo, Quyi Xu, Chengdong Ma, Zhilei Chen, Fei Gao, Chao Liu, Jian Zhao","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimating the postmortem interval (PMI) is crucial in forensic science. Recent studies suggest microbial community succession patterns as a promising tool for PMI inference. This study examines how the cause of death, specifically mechanical asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock, influences microbial succession. By utilizing 16S amplicon sequencing, the study characterizes the succession patterns of microbial communities in different body parts (facial skin and cecal tissue) and applies random forest regression to develop PMI inference models. The results revealed significant differences in the decomposition processes between mechanical asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock. Determining the PMI based solely on postmortem phenomena proved challenging. Microbial communities in facial skin and cecal tissue-two distinct body parts from a decomposing corpse with the same cause of death-showed considerable variation, and the microbial composition in cecal tissue also differed between the two causes of death. The regression model, based on microbiota data at the family level, demonstrated the best performance. Specifically, eight bacterial families, including Enterobacteriaceae and Corynebacteriaceae, in facial skin were identified as predictors of PMI in corpses decomposed due to mechanical asphyxia, with an average absolute error of 2.15 ± 0.85 days. In contrast, 28 bacterial families, such as Lachnospiraceae and Clostridiales_NA, in cecal tissue were found to predict the PMI of corpses decomposed due to hemorrhagic shock, with an average absolute error of 2.52 ± 0.74 days. These findings provide a valuable microbial dataset for advancing forensic PMI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial succession patterns for postmortem interval estimation in decomposed mouse cadavers: A comparative study of mechanical asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Su, Xingchun Zhao, Xinbiao Liao, Xiaohui Chen, Qingqing Xiang, Yadong Guo, Quyi Xu, Chengdong Ma, Zhilei Chen, Fei Gao, Chao Liu, Jian Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1556-4029.70108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Estimating the postmortem interval (PMI) is crucial in forensic science. Recent studies suggest microbial community succession patterns as a promising tool for PMI inference. This study examines how the cause of death, specifically mechanical asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock, influences microbial succession. By utilizing 16S amplicon sequencing, the study characterizes the succession patterns of microbial communities in different body parts (facial skin and cecal tissue) and applies random forest regression to develop PMI inference models. The results revealed significant differences in the decomposition processes between mechanical asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock. Determining the PMI based solely on postmortem phenomena proved challenging. Microbial communities in facial skin and cecal tissue-two distinct body parts from a decomposing corpse with the same cause of death-showed considerable variation, and the microbial composition in cecal tissue also differed between the two causes of death. The regression model, based on microbiota data at the family level, demonstrated the best performance. Specifically, eight bacterial families, including Enterobacteriaceae and Corynebacteriaceae, in facial skin were identified as predictors of PMI in corpses decomposed due to mechanical asphyxia, with an average absolute error of 2.15 ± 0.85 days. In contrast, 28 bacterial families, such as Lachnospiraceae and Clostridiales_NA, in cecal tissue were found to predict the PMI of corpses decomposed due to hemorrhagic shock, with an average absolute error of 2.52 ± 0.74 days. These findings provide a valuable microbial dataset for advancing forensic PMI studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

估计死后时间间隔在法医学中是至关重要的。最近的研究表明,微生物群落演替模式是一种很有前途的PMI推断工具。本研究探讨死亡原因,特别是机械性窒息和失血性休克,如何影响微生物演替。利用16S扩增子测序,表征了不同身体部位(面部皮肤和盲肠组织)微生物群落的演替模式,并应用随机森林回归建立PMI推理模型。结果显示,机械窒息和失血性休克在分解过程中存在显著差异。仅根据死后现象来确定PMI是具有挑战性的。面部皮肤和盲肠组织中的微生物群落——腐烂尸体的两个不同的身体部位,具有相同的死亡原因——显示出相当大的差异,盲肠组织中的微生物组成也在两种死亡原因之间存在差异。基于家庭水平微生物群数据的回归模型表现出最好的性能。具体而言,面部皮肤中的肠杆菌科(enterobacteraceae)和链杆菌科(Corynebacteriaceae) 8个细菌科可作为机械性窒息分解尸体PMI的预测因子,平均绝对误差为2.15±0.85天。盲肠组织中毛螺科(Lachnospiraceae)和梭菌(clostridies_na)等28个细菌科可预测失血性休克分解尸体的PMI,平均绝对误差为2.52±0.74 d。这些发现为推进法医PMI研究提供了有价值的微生物数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbial succession patterns for postmortem interval estimation in decomposed mouse cadavers: A comparative study of mechanical asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock.

Estimating the postmortem interval (PMI) is crucial in forensic science. Recent studies suggest microbial community succession patterns as a promising tool for PMI inference. This study examines how the cause of death, specifically mechanical asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock, influences microbial succession. By utilizing 16S amplicon sequencing, the study characterizes the succession patterns of microbial communities in different body parts (facial skin and cecal tissue) and applies random forest regression to develop PMI inference models. The results revealed significant differences in the decomposition processes between mechanical asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock. Determining the PMI based solely on postmortem phenomena proved challenging. Microbial communities in facial skin and cecal tissue-two distinct body parts from a decomposing corpse with the same cause of death-showed considerable variation, and the microbial composition in cecal tissue also differed between the two causes of death. The regression model, based on microbiota data at the family level, demonstrated the best performance. Specifically, eight bacterial families, including Enterobacteriaceae and Corynebacteriaceae, in facial skin were identified as predictors of PMI in corpses decomposed due to mechanical asphyxia, with an average absolute error of 2.15 ± 0.85 days. In contrast, 28 bacterial families, such as Lachnospiraceae and Clostridiales_NA, in cecal tissue were found to predict the PMI of corpses decomposed due to hemorrhagic shock, with an average absolute error of 2.52 ± 0.74 days. These findings provide a valuable microbial dataset for advancing forensic PMI studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信