[使用自行开发的无线面肌电图系统评估咀嚼肌的功能和活动]。

Wenbo Li, Yujia Zhu, Qingzhao Qin, Shenyao Shan, Zixiang Gao, Aonan Wen, Yong Wang, Yijiao Zhao
{"title":"[使用自行开发的无线面肌电图系统评估咀嚼肌的功能和活动]。","authors":"Wenbo Li, Yujia Zhu, Qingzhao Qin, Shenyao Shan, Zixiang Gao, Aonan Wen, Yong Wang, Yijiao Zhao","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of a self-developed domestic wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) system (Oralmetry) in assessing the activity of the temporalis and masseter muscles to provide theoretical support for its clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two volunteers were recruited. Through multiple repeated measurements, the sEMG signals of bilateral anterior temporalis and masseter muscles during maximum voluntary clenching were collected using the self-developed sEMG device, Oralmetry, and two commercial sEMG devices (Zebris and Teethan), filtered, screened, and standardized. Seven sEMG indicators for assessing masticatory muscle function were calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements from the three sEMG devices, and statistical analysis was conducted to compare the consistency of the seven sEMG indicators obtained from the devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 22 participants, the ICC values of the repeated measurements from the three sEMG devices ranged from 0.88 to 0.99. The measurements of three sEMG indicators (antero-posterior coeffificient, percentage overlapping coeffificient_MM, and percentage overlapping coeffificient_TA) obtained by Zebris were significantly different from those obtained by Oralmetry and Teethan (<i>P</i><0.05). No significant differences in the measurements of the seven sEMG indicators were found between Oralmetry and Teethan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oralmetry and the two commercial sEMG devices demonstrated good repeatability in capturing sEMG indicators for evaluating masticatory muscle function. In particular, Oralmetry showed the highest ICC values. All three devices also exhibited good consistency in measuring sEMG indicators, and a high agreement was observed between the two wireless sEMG devices (Oralmetry and Teethan). These findings provide theoretical support for the clinical application of Oralmetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":94028,"journal":{"name":"Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology","volume":"43 3","pages":"346-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of the function and activity of masticatory muscles using a self-developed wireless surface electromyography system].\",\"authors\":\"Wenbo Li, Yujia Zhu, Qingzhao Qin, Shenyao Shan, Zixiang Gao, Aonan Wen, Yong Wang, Yijiao Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of a self-developed domestic wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) system (Oralmetry) in assessing the activity of the temporalis and masseter muscles to provide theoretical support for its clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two volunteers were recruited. Through multiple repeated measurements, the sEMG signals of bilateral anterior temporalis and masseter muscles during maximum voluntary clenching were collected using the self-developed sEMG device, Oralmetry, and two commercial sEMG devices (Zebris and Teethan), filtered, screened, and standardized. Seven sEMG indicators for assessing masticatory muscle function were calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements from the three sEMG devices, and statistical analysis was conducted to compare the consistency of the seven sEMG indicators obtained from the devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 22 participants, the ICC values of the repeated measurements from the three sEMG devices ranged from 0.88 to 0.99. The measurements of three sEMG indicators (antero-posterior coeffificient, percentage overlapping coeffificient_MM, and percentage overlapping coeffificient_TA) obtained by Zebris were significantly different from those obtained by Oralmetry and Teethan (<i>P</i><0.05). No significant differences in the measurements of the seven sEMG indicators were found between Oralmetry and Teethan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oralmetry and the two commercial sEMG devices demonstrated good repeatability in capturing sEMG indicators for evaluating masticatory muscle function. In particular, Oralmetry showed the highest ICC values. All three devices also exhibited good consistency in measuring sEMG indicators, and a high agreement was observed between the two wireless sEMG devices (Oralmetry and Teethan). These findings provide theoretical support for the clinical application of Oralmetry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"346-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211495/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价自主研制的国产无线肌表电(sEMG)系统(Oralmetry)评估颞肌和咬肌活动的重复性和可靠性,为其临床应用提供理论支持。方法:招募22名志愿者。通过多次重复测量,采用自主研发的肌电仪Oralmetry和两种商用肌电仪(Zebris和Teethan)采集双侧颞前肌和咬肌在最大自主紧绷时的肌电信号,进行过滤、筛选和标准化。计算了评估咀嚼肌功能的7项肌电图指标。采用类内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)评价三种表面肌电信号测量结果的重复性,并进行统计分析,比较三种表面肌电信号测量结果的一致性。结果:在22名参与者中,3种表面肌电装置重复测量的ICC值在0.88 ~ 0.99之间。Zebris测定的3个表面肌电信号指标(前后系数、重叠百分数、重叠百分数)与Oralmetry和Teethan测定的表面肌电信号指标有显著性差异(p)。结论:Oralmetry和两种商用表面肌电信号仪在捕捉评价咀嚼肌功能的表面肌电信号指标方面具有良好的重复性。其中,Oralmetry的ICC值最高。这三种设备在测量表面肌电信号指标方面也表现出良好的一致性,并且在两种无线表面肌电信号设备(Oralmetry和Teethan)之间观察到高度一致性。这些发现为口腔测量的临床应用提供了理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of the function and activity of masticatory muscles using a self-developed wireless surface electromyography system].

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of a self-developed domestic wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) system (Oralmetry) in assessing the activity of the temporalis and masseter muscles to provide theoretical support for its clinical application.

Methods: Twenty-two volunteers were recruited. Through multiple repeated measurements, the sEMG signals of bilateral anterior temporalis and masseter muscles during maximum voluntary clenching were collected using the self-developed sEMG device, Oralmetry, and two commercial sEMG devices (Zebris and Teethan), filtered, screened, and standardized. Seven sEMG indicators for assessing masticatory muscle function were calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability of the measurements from the three sEMG devices, and statistical analysis was conducted to compare the consistency of the seven sEMG indicators obtained from the devices.

Results: Among the 22 participants, the ICC values of the repeated measurements from the three sEMG devices ranged from 0.88 to 0.99. The measurements of three sEMG indicators (antero-posterior coeffificient, percentage overlapping coeffificient_MM, and percentage overlapping coeffificient_TA) obtained by Zebris were significantly different from those obtained by Oralmetry and Teethan (P<0.05). No significant differences in the measurements of the seven sEMG indicators were found between Oralmetry and Teethan.

Conclusions: Oralmetry and the two commercial sEMG devices demonstrated good repeatability in capturing sEMG indicators for evaluating masticatory muscle function. In particular, Oralmetry showed the highest ICC values. All three devices also exhibited good consistency in measuring sEMG indicators, and a high agreement was observed between the two wireless sEMG devices (Oralmetry and Teethan). These findings provide theoretical support for the clinical application of Oralmetry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信