Maria Jędrzejczyk, Christopher S Lee, Quin E Denfeld, Remigiusz Szczepanowski, Bernadetta Żółkowska, Michał Czapla, Ercole Vellone, Marta Wleklik, Magdalena Lisiak, Izabella Uchmanowicz
{"title":"成人心力衰竭患者的情感症状、认知功能和自我护理行为与射血分数表型的关系","authors":"Maria Jędrzejczyk, Christopher S Lee, Quin E Denfeld, Remigiusz Szczepanowski, Bernadetta Żółkowska, Michał Czapla, Ercole Vellone, Marta Wleklik, Magdalena Lisiak, Izabella Uchmanowicz","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare affective symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and self-care behaviors among different heart failure (HF) phenotypes and to explore their interrelationships, particularly examining how cognitive and affective factors influence self-care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 250 older adults hospitalized for acute decompensated HF, categorized into three groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and preserved EF (HFpEF). Affective symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), while cognitive function was evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Self-care behaviors were measured using the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. Among participants, 42% had HFrEF, 18.4% had HFmrEF, and 39.6% had HFpEF. Cognitive dysfunction was more pronounced in HFpEF patients (MMSE median = 28.0, IQR = 26.0-29.0) compared to those with HFrEF (median = 28.0, IQR = 27.0-29.0) or HFmrEF (median = 29.0, IQR = 27.3-29.0, p = 0.008). Higher MMSE scores were significantly associated with better self-care behaviors in HFpEF patients (Spearman's r = -0.299, p = 0.003), but not in the other groups. Significant differences were found in specific self-care behaviors, including contacting healthcare providers and adherence to a low-sodium diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although variations in cognitive function and self-care behaviors were observed across heart failure phenotypes, these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Tailored interventions should be based on a comprehensive assessment of cognitive and emotional health, rather than heart failure phenotype alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affective Symptoms, Cognitive Function and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults with Heart Failure according to Ejection Fraction Phenotype.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Jędrzejczyk, Christopher S Lee, Quin E Denfeld, Remigiusz Szczepanowski, Bernadetta Żółkowska, Michał Czapla, Ercole Vellone, Marta Wleklik, Magdalena Lisiak, Izabella Uchmanowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare affective symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and self-care behaviors among different heart failure (HF) phenotypes and to explore their interrelationships, particularly examining how cognitive and affective factors influence self-care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 250 older adults hospitalized for acute decompensated HF, categorized into three groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and preserved EF (HFpEF). Affective symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), while cognitive function was evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Self-care behaviors were measured using the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. Among participants, 42% had HFrEF, 18.4% had HFmrEF, and 39.6% had HFpEF. Cognitive dysfunction was more pronounced in HFpEF patients (MMSE median = 28.0, IQR = 26.0-29.0) compared to those with HFrEF (median = 28.0, IQR = 27.0-29.0) or HFmrEF (median = 29.0, IQR = 27.3-29.0, p = 0.008). Higher MMSE scores were significantly associated with better self-care behaviors in HFpEF patients (Spearman's r = -0.299, p = 0.003), but not in the other groups. Significant differences were found in specific self-care behaviors, including contacting healthcare providers and adherence to a low-sodium diet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although variations in cognitive function and self-care behaviors were observed across heart failure phenotypes, these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Tailored interventions should be based on a comprehensive assessment of cognitive and emotional health, rather than heart failure phenotype alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of cardiovascular nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of cardiovascular nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是比较不同心力衰竭(HF)表型的情感症状、认知功能障碍和自我保健行为,并探讨它们之间的相互关系,特别是研究认知和情感因素如何影响自我保健行为。方法和结果:这项横断面研究纳入了250名因急性失代偿性心衰住院的老年人,根据左心室射血分数(EF)分为三组:EF降低的HF (HFrEF)、EF轻度降低的HF (HFmrEF)和EF保留的HF (HFpEF)。情感症状采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)进行评估,认知功能采用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)进行评估。自我护理行为采用欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表进行测量。在参与者中,42%患有HFrEF, 18.4%患有HFmrEF, 39.6%患有HFpEF。与HFrEF(中位数= 28.0,IQR = 27.0-29.0)或HFmrEF(中位数= 29.0,IQR = 27.3-29.0, p = 0.008)相比,HFpEF患者(MMSE中位数= 28.0,IQR = 26.0-29.0)的认知功能障碍更为明显(MMSE中位数= 28.0,IQR = 26.0-29.0)。高MMSE得分与HFpEF患者更好的自我护理行为显著相关(Spearman’s r = -0.299, p = 0.003),但在其他组中没有。在特定的自我护理行为上发现了显著的差异,包括联系医疗服务提供者和坚持低钠饮食。结论:尽管认知功能和自我护理行为在心力衰竭表型中存在差异,但在调整人口统计学和临床因素后,这些差异无统计学意义。量身定制的干预措施应基于对认知和情绪健康的综合评估,而不仅仅是心力衰竭的表型。
Affective Symptoms, Cognitive Function and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults with Heart Failure according to Ejection Fraction Phenotype.
Aims: The aim of this study was to compare affective symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and self-care behaviors among different heart failure (HF) phenotypes and to explore their interrelationships, particularly examining how cognitive and affective factors influence self-care practices.
Methods and results: This cross-sectional study involved 250 older adults hospitalized for acute decompensated HF, categorized into three groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and preserved EF (HFpEF). Affective symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), while cognitive function was evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Self-care behaviors were measured using the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. Among participants, 42% had HFrEF, 18.4% had HFmrEF, and 39.6% had HFpEF. Cognitive dysfunction was more pronounced in HFpEF patients (MMSE median = 28.0, IQR = 26.0-29.0) compared to those with HFrEF (median = 28.0, IQR = 27.0-29.0) or HFmrEF (median = 29.0, IQR = 27.3-29.0, p = 0.008). Higher MMSE scores were significantly associated with better self-care behaviors in HFpEF patients (Spearman's r = -0.299, p = 0.003), but not in the other groups. Significant differences were found in specific self-care behaviors, including contacting healthcare providers and adherence to a low-sodium diet.
Conclusion: Although variations in cognitive function and self-care behaviors were observed across heart failure phenotypes, these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Tailored interventions should be based on a comprehensive assessment of cognitive and emotional health, rather than heart failure phenotype alone.