使用羽毛中队对澳大利亚听力障碍儿童的听觉加工进行远程评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Grace Nixon, Cameron James Patrick, Lucy Shiels
{"title":"使用羽毛中队对澳大利亚听力障碍儿童的听觉加工进行远程评估。","authors":"Grace Nixon, Cameron James Patrick, Lucy Shiels","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Auditory processing (AP) disorder is underdiagnosed in Australian children due to reduced access to assessments. Mobile health technology (mHealth) tools such as the AP assessment application Feather Squadron (FS) may be a way to overcome barriers of clinical assessments. This study aimed to consider the validity of FS as a remote assessment tool when compared to current Australian clinical assessments of speech recognition in noise, dichotic listening, temporal processing, and auditory short-term memory.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study employed a within-subject, comparative design. Thirty-five normal-hearing children aged between 6.8 and 13.1 years (<i>M</i> = 9.1, <i>SD =</i> 1.8) were tested on the following AP skills: dichotic listening, temporal sequencing, speech recognition in noise, and auditory short-term memory. Participants were tested using traditional clinical tests administered by a qualified audiologist and then completed an mHealth delivered counterpart via the FS application. Results of both clinical and FS tests were converted into age-related <i>z</i> scores or scaled scores for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant, positive interclass correlations were found on assessments of dichotic listening in the worse ear and temporal sequencing. However, poor agreement was noted between these assessments using Bland-Altman analysis, which found substantial bias and wide limits of agreement. A moderate significant Pearson correlation was noted when comparing performance on the clinical and FS auditory short-term memory task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mHealth tools like FS may be useful for identifying children at risk of AP disorder and increasing referrals for assessment. The poor limits of agreement and bias recognize that FS assessments cannot directly replace clinical tests of AP skills and that despite significant relations between tasks, clinical assessments of AP skills delivered by specialists in a controlled environment remains preferable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Feather Squadron as a Remote Assessment of Auditory Processing in Australian Children With Listening Difficulties.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Nixon, Cameron James Patrick, Lucy Shiels\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Auditory processing (AP) disorder is underdiagnosed in Australian children due to reduced access to assessments. Mobile health technology (mHealth) tools such as the AP assessment application Feather Squadron (FS) may be a way to overcome barriers of clinical assessments. This study aimed to consider the validity of FS as a remote assessment tool when compared to current Australian clinical assessments of speech recognition in noise, dichotic listening, temporal processing, and auditory short-term memory.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study employed a within-subject, comparative design. Thirty-five normal-hearing children aged between 6.8 and 13.1 years (<i>M</i> = 9.1, <i>SD =</i> 1.8) were tested on the following AP skills: dichotic listening, temporal sequencing, speech recognition in noise, and auditory short-term memory. Participants were tested using traditional clinical tests administered by a qualified audiologist and then completed an mHealth delivered counterpart via the FS application. Results of both clinical and FS tests were converted into age-related <i>z</i> scores or scaled scores for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant, positive interclass correlations were found on assessments of dichotic listening in the worse ear and temporal sequencing. However, poor agreement was noted between these assessments using Bland-Altman analysis, which found substantial bias and wide limits of agreement. A moderate significant Pearson correlation was noted when comparing performance on the clinical and FS auditory short-term memory task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mHealth tools like FS may be useful for identifying children at risk of AP disorder and increasing referrals for assessment. The poor limits of agreement and bias recognize that FS assessments cannot directly replace clinical tests of AP skills and that despite significant relations between tasks, clinical assessments of AP skills delivered by specialists in a controlled environment remains preferable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:听觉处理(AP)障碍在澳大利亚儿童中诊断不足,因为获得评估的机会减少。移动医疗技术(mHealth)工具,如AP评估应用程序Feather Squadron (FS),可能是克服临床评估障碍的一种方法。本研究旨在考虑FS作为远程评估工具的有效性,并将其与澳大利亚目前在噪音、二分聆听、时间处理和听觉短期记忆方面的语音识别临床评估进行比较。方法:本研究采用受试者内比较设计。对35名年龄在6.8 ~ 13.1岁之间的正常听力儿童(M = 9.1, SD = 1.8)进行了以下AP技能测试:二分法听力、时间排序、噪音语音识别和听觉短期记忆。参与者使用由合格听力学家管理的传统临床测试进行测试,然后通过FS应用程序完成移动健康提供的对应测试。将临床和FS测试结果转换为年龄相关z分数或量表分数进行比较。结果:在较差耳朵和时间顺序的二元听力评估中发现显著的、正相关的班级间相关性。然而,使用Bland-Altman分析发现,这些评估之间的一致性很差,发现了大量的偏差和广泛的一致性限制。当比较临床和FS听觉短期记忆任务的表现时,注意到中度显著的Pearson相关性。结论:像FS这样的移动健康工具可能有助于识别有AP障碍风险的儿童,并增加转诊评估。一致性和偏见的局限性认识到,FS评估不能直接取代AP技能的临床测试,尽管任务之间存在重大关系,但在受控环境中由专家提供的AP技能临床评估仍然是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Feather Squadron as a Remote Assessment of Auditory Processing in Australian Children With Listening Difficulties.

Purpose: Auditory processing (AP) disorder is underdiagnosed in Australian children due to reduced access to assessments. Mobile health technology (mHealth) tools such as the AP assessment application Feather Squadron (FS) may be a way to overcome barriers of clinical assessments. This study aimed to consider the validity of FS as a remote assessment tool when compared to current Australian clinical assessments of speech recognition in noise, dichotic listening, temporal processing, and auditory short-term memory.

Method: This study employed a within-subject, comparative design. Thirty-five normal-hearing children aged between 6.8 and 13.1 years (M = 9.1, SD = 1.8) were tested on the following AP skills: dichotic listening, temporal sequencing, speech recognition in noise, and auditory short-term memory. Participants were tested using traditional clinical tests administered by a qualified audiologist and then completed an mHealth delivered counterpart via the FS application. Results of both clinical and FS tests were converted into age-related z scores or scaled scores for comparison.

Results: Significant, positive interclass correlations were found on assessments of dichotic listening in the worse ear and temporal sequencing. However, poor agreement was noted between these assessments using Bland-Altman analysis, which found substantial bias and wide limits of agreement. A moderate significant Pearson correlation was noted when comparing performance on the clinical and FS auditory short-term memory task.

Conclusions: mHealth tools like FS may be useful for identifying children at risk of AP disorder and increasing referrals for assessment. The poor limits of agreement and bias recognize that FS assessments cannot directly replace clinical tests of AP skills and that despite significant relations between tasks, clinical assessments of AP skills delivered by specialists in a controlled environment remains preferable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信