动机访谈试点随机试验针对不同种族、语言和种族的母亲在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的床边存在。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Melissa A Faith, Sarah Sobalvarro, Allison Schimmel-Bristow, Jonathan T Rawlins, Rachel Glock, Ana S P Miranda, Vedanta Dariya, Dailyn Acosta
{"title":"动机访谈试点随机试验针对不同种族、语言和种族的母亲在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的床边存在。","authors":"Melissa A Faith, Sarah Sobalvarro, Allison Schimmel-Bristow, Jonathan T Rawlins, Rachel Glock, Ana S P Miranda, Vedanta Dariya, Dailyn Acosta","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of motivational interviewing (MI) designed to increase neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) presence among ethnically/linguistically/racially diverse mothers. We also assessed study design feasibility to inform a larger, future randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We randomized 95 mothers to receive MI (intervention condition) or treatment as usual (control condition) during their baby's Level IV NICU admission. Eligibility criteria included mothers' adult age, English- and/or Spanish-language proficiency, and having a NICU-hospitalized infant. Using single-blind methodology, we assigned mothers to receive MI (n = 47) or treatment-as-usual (n = 42). Mothers rated intervention satisfaction, the extent to which MI motivated their NICU presence, and their openness to additional MI intervention. We evaluated MI fidelity to further assess MI feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 131 eligible mothers, 72.5% enrolled. Motivational interviewing-arm mothers received 1-6 weekly MI sessions. Regarding MI-arm mothers, 100% agreed to subsequent MI intervention, and 90% reported strong MI satisfaction. Eighty-seven percent of mothers reported that MI motivated them to be present in the NICU. Motivational interviewing interventionists achieved expert proficiency for 72.7% of coded MI sessions and basic competency for the remaining 27.3% of coded sessions. Mothers' MI perceptions did not differ by ethnic or linguistic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Motivational interviewing was feasible and highly acceptable across all ethnic/linguistic/racial groups, making MI a promising intervention to increase maternal NICU presence among mothers from traditionally marginalized groups. Future research should evaluate the extent to which MI can increase maternal NICU presence and enhance infant (e.g., medical/developmental) and maternal (e.g., postpartum depression, infant bonding) outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"456-466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivational interviewing pilot randomized trial targeting ethnically-, linguistically-, and racially-diverse mothers' Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) bedside presence.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa A Faith, Sarah Sobalvarro, Allison Schimmel-Bristow, Jonathan T Rawlins, Rachel Glock, Ana S P Miranda, Vedanta Dariya, Dailyn Acosta\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of motivational interviewing (MI) designed to increase neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) presence among ethnically/linguistically/racially diverse mothers. We also assessed study design feasibility to inform a larger, future randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We randomized 95 mothers to receive MI (intervention condition) or treatment as usual (control condition) during their baby's Level IV NICU admission. Eligibility criteria included mothers' adult age, English- and/or Spanish-language proficiency, and having a NICU-hospitalized infant. Using single-blind methodology, we assigned mothers to receive MI (n = 47) or treatment-as-usual (n = 42). Mothers rated intervention satisfaction, the extent to which MI motivated their NICU presence, and their openness to additional MI intervention. We evaluated MI fidelity to further assess MI feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 131 eligible mothers, 72.5% enrolled. Motivational interviewing-arm mothers received 1-6 weekly MI sessions. Regarding MI-arm mothers, 100% agreed to subsequent MI intervention, and 90% reported strong MI satisfaction. Eighty-seven percent of mothers reported that MI motivated them to be present in the NICU. Motivational interviewing interventionists achieved expert proficiency for 72.7% of coded MI sessions and basic competency for the remaining 27.3% of coded sessions. Mothers' MI perceptions did not differ by ethnic or linguistic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Motivational interviewing was feasible and highly acceptable across all ethnic/linguistic/racial groups, making MI a promising intervention to increase maternal NICU presence among mothers from traditionally marginalized groups. Future research should evaluate the extent to which MI can increase maternal NICU presence and enhance infant (e.g., medical/developmental) and maternal (e.g., postpartum depression, infant bonding) outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"456-466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们评估动机访谈(MI)的可行性、可接受性和保真度,旨在增加不同民族/语言/种族母亲在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的存在。我们还评估了研究设计的可行性,为将来更大规模的随机对照试验提供信息。方法:将95名母亲随机分为干预组(MI)和对照组(MI)。入选标准包括母亲的成年年龄,英语和/或西班牙语熟练程度,以及有新生儿重症监护病房住院的婴儿。采用单盲方法,我们分配母亲接受心肌梗死(n = 47)或常规治疗(n = 42)。母亲们评价了干预的满意度,心梗对新生儿重症监护病房的影响程度,以及她们对额外的心梗干预的开放程度。我们评估心肌梗死保真度以进一步评估心肌梗死的可行性。结果:131名符合条件的母亲中,72.5%入组。动机访谈组母亲每周接受1-6次MI治疗。对于MI臂母亲,100%的人同意随后的MI干预,90%的人报告了强烈的MI满意度。87%的母亲报告说,心肌梗塞促使她们出现在新生儿重症监护病房。动机性访谈干预者在72.7%的编码MI会话中达到专家熟练程度,在其余27.3%的编码会话中达到基本能力。母亲对MI的认知没有因种族或语言群体而异。结论:在所有民族/语言/种族群体中,动机性访谈是可行的,并且是高度可接受的,这使得MI成为一种有希望的干预措施,可以提高传统边缘化群体母亲的新生儿重症监护病房使用率。未来的研究应该评估心肌梗死在多大程度上可以增加产妇NICU的存在,并提高婴儿(例如,医学/发育)和产妇(例如,产后抑郁,婴儿粘合)的结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motivational interviewing pilot randomized trial targeting ethnically-, linguistically-, and racially-diverse mothers' Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) bedside presence.

Objective: We evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of motivational interviewing (MI) designed to increase neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) presence among ethnically/linguistically/racially diverse mothers. We also assessed study design feasibility to inform a larger, future randomized controlled trial.

Method: We randomized 95 mothers to receive MI (intervention condition) or treatment as usual (control condition) during their baby's Level IV NICU admission. Eligibility criteria included mothers' adult age, English- and/or Spanish-language proficiency, and having a NICU-hospitalized infant. Using single-blind methodology, we assigned mothers to receive MI (n = 47) or treatment-as-usual (n = 42). Mothers rated intervention satisfaction, the extent to which MI motivated their NICU presence, and their openness to additional MI intervention. We evaluated MI fidelity to further assess MI feasibility.

Results: Of 131 eligible mothers, 72.5% enrolled. Motivational interviewing-arm mothers received 1-6 weekly MI sessions. Regarding MI-arm mothers, 100% agreed to subsequent MI intervention, and 90% reported strong MI satisfaction. Eighty-seven percent of mothers reported that MI motivated them to be present in the NICU. Motivational interviewing interventionists achieved expert proficiency for 72.7% of coded MI sessions and basic competency for the remaining 27.3% of coded sessions. Mothers' MI perceptions did not differ by ethnic or linguistic groups.

Conclusions: Motivational interviewing was feasible and highly acceptable across all ethnic/linguistic/racial groups, making MI a promising intervention to increase maternal NICU presence among mothers from traditionally marginalized groups. Future research should evaluate the extent to which MI can increase maternal NICU presence and enhance infant (e.g., medical/developmental) and maternal (e.g., postpartum depression, infant bonding) outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信