Karin Jeppesen, Anita Rabøl Good, Ilse Dall Dyrhaug, Marianne Bruun Johansen, Jette Primdahl
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者持续气道正压治疗障碍和促进因素的体验——一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Karin Jeppesen, Anita Rabøl Good, Ilse Dall Dyrhaug, Marianne Bruun Johansen, Jette Primdahl","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01645-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea ranges from 6 to 17% in the general adult population. Untreated obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, traffic accidents, and decreased quality of life. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the gold standard for treating OSA. However, only approximately half of all treated patients succeed with this therapy. There is a lack of knowledge about the patient experience of CPAP treatment and the barriers and facilitators to successful CPAP treatment. The study aimed to explore how newly diagnosed patients with OSA experience receiving the diagnosis, their motivation for treatment, and essential factors for successful CPAP treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design using individual semi-structured interviews was applied. Patients with successful (n = 10) and unsuccessful (n = 9) treatment were interviewed. Qualitative Content Analysis inspired by Graneheim and Lundman was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis derived five themes: \"Symptoms and thoughts about the diagnosis and CPAP treatment\", \"Expectations and personal resources are important for success\", \"The experience of problems and benefit from CPAP treatment\", \"Social impact of CPAP treatment\" and \"Information and support from the sleep clinic.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Newly diagnosed patients with obstructive sleep apnoea describe barriers to successful CPAP treatment as lack of support from their partner and problems with the equipment. Important facilitators are positive expectations, partner support, and noticeable treatment effects. Early follow-up support, a biopsychosocial approach, and relatives' involvement in the sleep clinic consultations are needed to support patients toward successful CPAP treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' experiences of barriers and facilitators with continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnoea - a qualitative interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Karin Jeppesen, Anita Rabøl Good, Ilse Dall Dyrhaug, Marianne Bruun Johansen, Jette Primdahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01645-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea ranges from 6 to 17% in the general adult population. Untreated obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, traffic accidents, and decreased quality of life. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the gold standard for treating OSA. However, only approximately half of all treated patients succeed with this therapy. There is a lack of knowledge about the patient experience of CPAP treatment and the barriers and facilitators to successful CPAP treatment. The study aimed to explore how newly diagnosed patients with OSA experience receiving the diagnosis, their motivation for treatment, and essential factors for successful CPAP treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design using individual semi-structured interviews was applied. Patients with successful (n = 10) and unsuccessful (n = 9) treatment were interviewed. Qualitative Content Analysis inspired by Graneheim and Lundman was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis derived five themes: \\\"Symptoms and thoughts about the diagnosis and CPAP treatment\\\", \\\"Expectations and personal resources are important for success\\\", \\\"The experience of problems and benefit from CPAP treatment\\\", \\\"Social impact of CPAP treatment\\\" and \\\"Information and support from the sleep clinic.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Newly diagnosed patients with obstructive sleep apnoea describe barriers to successful CPAP treatment as lack of support from their partner and problems with the equipment. Important facilitators are positive expectations, partner support, and noticeable treatment effects. Early follow-up support, a biopsychosocial approach, and relatives' involvement in the sleep clinic consultations are needed to support patients toward successful CPAP treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168316/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01645-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01645-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients' experiences of barriers and facilitators with continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnoea - a qualitative interview study.
Background: The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea ranges from 6 to 17% in the general adult population. Untreated obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, traffic accidents, and decreased quality of life. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the gold standard for treating OSA. However, only approximately half of all treated patients succeed with this therapy. There is a lack of knowledge about the patient experience of CPAP treatment and the barriers and facilitators to successful CPAP treatment. The study aimed to explore how newly diagnosed patients with OSA experience receiving the diagnosis, their motivation for treatment, and essential factors for successful CPAP treatment.
Methods: A qualitative design using individual semi-structured interviews was applied. Patients with successful (n = 10) and unsuccessful (n = 9) treatment were interviewed. Qualitative Content Analysis inspired by Graneheim and Lundman was used.
Results: The analysis derived five themes: "Symptoms and thoughts about the diagnosis and CPAP treatment", "Expectations and personal resources are important for success", "The experience of problems and benefit from CPAP treatment", "Social impact of CPAP treatment" and "Information and support from the sleep clinic."
Conclusions: Newly diagnosed patients with obstructive sleep apnoea describe barriers to successful CPAP treatment as lack of support from their partner and problems with the equipment. Important facilitators are positive expectations, partner support, and noticeable treatment effects. Early follow-up support, a biopsychosocial approach, and relatives' involvement in the sleep clinic consultations are needed to support patients toward successful CPAP treatment.
期刊介绍:
rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.