在2024年医院改革背景下对联邦医院地图集的评估:对德国医院医疗保健服务的批判性分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jonas Roos, Theresa Isabelle Wilhelm, Ron Martin, Kristian Welle, Elio Assaf, Robert Kaczmarczyk
{"title":"在2024年医院改革背景下对联邦医院地图集的评估:对德国医院医疗保健服务的批判性分析。","authors":"Jonas Roos, Theresa Isabelle Wilhelm, Ron Martin, Kristian Welle, Elio Assaf, Robert Kaczmarczyk","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01639-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of the ongoing German hospital reform, the newly introduced Federal Hospital Atlas aims to increase transparency regarding hospital structures and service quality. However, concerns have been raised regarding its completeness and reliability. Understanding regional differences in hospital characteristics-such as ownership type, staffing levels, emergency care provision, and specialization-is essential to assess the current state of healthcare and inform policy decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,628 hospitals using data from the Federal Hospital Atlas (as of April 2025). Hospitals were categorized by ownership type, region (old vs. new federal states), population density, and specialization. Multivariable regression models-including ordinal logistic and negative binomial regressions-were used to examine associations with nursing staff ratios, emergency care participation, the number of specialized departments, and certifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,628 hospitals analyzed, 36.57% were public, 35.27% nonprofit, and 28.16% private. Nonprofit (OR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.46-0.74]) and public hospitals (OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55-0.86]) had significantly lower nursing staff ratio categories compared to private hospitals but were more likely to provide emergency care (nonprofit: OR = 3.05, 95% CI [2.27-4.12]; public: OR = 4.81, 95% CI [3.52-6.61]). Trauma and/or orthopedic specialization was associated with higher emergency care participation (trauma: OR = 21.8; both: OR = 38.7) and higher structural differentiation (both: IRR = 3.11 for departments; IRR = 4.94 for certifications). Hospitals in densely populated areas had better nursing staff ratios (OR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.15-1.67]) and more certifications (IRR = 2.86, 95% CI [2.46-3.33]). No significant differences were found between old and new federal states in staffing or emergency care provision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis reveals significant differences in hospital facilities and service provision in Germany. Public and non-profit hospitals are more heavily involved in emergency care, but have comparatively lower nursing staff ratio categories. Hospitals specializing in trauma or orthopedic care, as well as those in urban areas, tend to be larger and better equipped. These results point to imbalances and underscore the need for political action to ensure equal access and high-quality hospital care across regions and providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the federal hospital atlas in the context of the hospital reform 2024: a critical analysis of the healthcare provision in German hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Roos, Theresa Isabelle Wilhelm, Ron Martin, Kristian Welle, Elio Assaf, Robert Kaczmarczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01639-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of the ongoing German hospital reform, the newly introduced Federal Hospital Atlas aims to increase transparency regarding hospital structures and service quality. However, concerns have been raised regarding its completeness and reliability. Understanding regional differences in hospital characteristics-such as ownership type, staffing levels, emergency care provision, and specialization-is essential to assess the current state of healthcare and inform policy decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,628 hospitals using data from the Federal Hospital Atlas (as of April 2025). Hospitals were categorized by ownership type, region (old vs. new federal states), population density, and specialization. Multivariable regression models-including ordinal logistic and negative binomial regressions-were used to examine associations with nursing staff ratios, emergency care participation, the number of specialized departments, and certifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,628 hospitals analyzed, 36.57% were public, 35.27% nonprofit, and 28.16% private. Nonprofit (OR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.46-0.74]) and public hospitals (OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55-0.86]) had significantly lower nursing staff ratio categories compared to private hospitals but were more likely to provide emergency care (nonprofit: OR = 3.05, 95% CI [2.27-4.12]; public: OR = 4.81, 95% CI [3.52-6.61]). Trauma and/or orthopedic specialization was associated with higher emergency care participation (trauma: OR = 21.8; both: OR = 38.7) and higher structural differentiation (both: IRR = 3.11 for departments; IRR = 4.94 for certifications). Hospitals in densely populated areas had better nursing staff ratios (OR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.15-1.67]) and more certifications (IRR = 2.86, 95% CI [2.46-3.33]). No significant differences were found between old and new federal states in staffing or emergency care provision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis reveals significant differences in hospital facilities and service provision in Germany. Public and non-profit hospitals are more heavily involved in emergency care, but have comparatively lower nursing staff ratio categories. Hospitals specializing in trauma or orthopedic care, as well as those in urban areas, tend to be larger and better equipped. These results point to imbalances and underscore the need for political action to ensure equal access and high-quality hospital care across regions and providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01639-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01639-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在正在进行的德国医院改革的背景下,新推出的联邦医院地图集旨在提高医院结构和服务质量的透明度。然而,人们对其完整性和可靠性提出了关切。了解医院特征的地区差异——如所有权类型、人员配备水平、急诊护理提供和专业化程度——对于评估医疗保健现状和为政策决策提供信息至关重要。方法:我们使用联邦医院地图集(截至2025年4月)的数据对1,628家医院进行了横断面分析。医院按所有权类型、地区(旧联邦州与新联邦州)、人口密度和专业化进行分类。多变量回归模型——包括有序逻辑回归和负二项回归——用于检验与护理人员比例、急诊护理参与、专科科室数量和认证的关系。结果:在所分析的1628家医院中,公立医院占36.57%,非营利性医院占35.27%,民营医院占28.16%。非营利性(OR = 0.58, 95% CI[0.46-0.74])和公立医院(OR = 0.69, 95% CI[0.55-0.86])的护理人员比例类别明显低于私立医院,但更有可能提供急诊护理(非营利性:OR = 3.05, 95% CI [2.27-4.12];public: OR = 4.81, 95% CI[3.52-6.61])。创伤和/或骨科专科与较高的急诊护理参与相关(创伤:or = 21.8;两者:OR = 38.7)和更高的结构分化(部门的IRR = 3.11;认证的IRR = 4.94)。人口稠密地区的医院护理人员比例较好(OR = 1.38, 95% CI[1.15 ~ 1.67]),认证证书较多(IRR = 2.86, 95% CI[2.46 ~ 3.33])。新旧联邦州在人员配备和紧急护理方面没有发现显著差异。结论:分析显示德国在医院设施和服务提供方面存在显著差异。公立医院和非营利性医院参与急救的程度较高,但护理人员比例类别相对较低。专门从事创伤或骨科护理的医院以及城市地区的医院往往更大,设备也更好。这些结果表明了不平衡,并强调需要采取政治行动,确保各区域和提供者平等获得高质量的医院护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the federal hospital atlas in the context of the hospital reform 2024: a critical analysis of the healthcare provision in German hospitals.

Background: In the context of the ongoing German hospital reform, the newly introduced Federal Hospital Atlas aims to increase transparency regarding hospital structures and service quality. However, concerns have been raised regarding its completeness and reliability. Understanding regional differences in hospital characteristics-such as ownership type, staffing levels, emergency care provision, and specialization-is essential to assess the current state of healthcare and inform policy decisions.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,628 hospitals using data from the Federal Hospital Atlas (as of April 2025). Hospitals were categorized by ownership type, region (old vs. new federal states), population density, and specialization. Multivariable regression models-including ordinal logistic and negative binomial regressions-were used to examine associations with nursing staff ratios, emergency care participation, the number of specialized departments, and certifications.

Results: Among the 1,628 hospitals analyzed, 36.57% were public, 35.27% nonprofit, and 28.16% private. Nonprofit (OR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.46-0.74]) and public hospitals (OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.55-0.86]) had significantly lower nursing staff ratio categories compared to private hospitals but were more likely to provide emergency care (nonprofit: OR = 3.05, 95% CI [2.27-4.12]; public: OR = 4.81, 95% CI [3.52-6.61]). Trauma and/or orthopedic specialization was associated with higher emergency care participation (trauma: OR = 21.8; both: OR = 38.7) and higher structural differentiation (both: IRR = 3.11 for departments; IRR = 4.94 for certifications). Hospitals in densely populated areas had better nursing staff ratios (OR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.15-1.67]) and more certifications (IRR = 2.86, 95% CI [2.46-3.33]). No significant differences were found between old and new federal states in staffing or emergency care provision.

Conclusion: The analysis reveals significant differences in hospital facilities and service provision in Germany. Public and non-profit hospitals are more heavily involved in emergency care, but have comparatively lower nursing staff ratio categories. Hospitals specializing in trauma or orthopedic care, as well as those in urban areas, tend to be larger and better equipped. These results point to imbalances and underscore the need for political action to ensure equal access and high-quality hospital care across regions and providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信