Suzanne E Decker, Kristin M Mattocks, Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers, Frances M Aunon, Lorrie Walker, Elizabeth Galliford, Neal Doran, Scarlett Baird, Jennifer K Rielage, Joseph Sadek, Josephine Ridley, Jenny Bannister, Thorayya S Giovannelli, Sara J Landes, Marianne Goodman, Eric DeRycke, Chris Shriver, Ethan Spana, Mark Honsberger, Stacey A Demirelli, Elena Shest, Steve Martino
{"title":"退伍军人健康管理局员工对实施辩证行为治疗技能小组的看法。","authors":"Suzanne E Decker, Kristin M Mattocks, Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers, Frances M Aunon, Lorrie Walker, Elizabeth Galliford, Neal Doran, Scarlett Baird, Jennifer K Rielage, Joseph Sadek, Josephine Ridley, Jenny Bannister, Thorayya S Giovannelli, Sara J Landes, Marianne Goodman, Eric DeRycke, Chris Shriver, Ethan Spana, Mark Honsberger, Stacey A Demirelli, Elena Shest, Steve Martino","doi":"10.1037/ser0000960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reducing veteran suicide is a high priority for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). While dialectical behavior therapy skills groups (DBT-SG) may be as effective as comprehensive DBT in reducing suicide attempt, barriers and facilitators to this innovation in VHA are not well known. In preparation for a hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial, we conducted individual semistructured qualitative interviews with 35 VHA staff (therapists, suicide prevention coordinators, local and national leaders) and identified themes using rapid qualitative analysis (Hamilton, 2013). Five themes emerged: (a) While leadership noted wanting innovative suicide prevention, (b) knowledge of DBT varied widely across respondents. (c) Implementation challenges, especially after COVID-19, included staff shortage and burnout. (d) DBT-SG may require adaptation to fit the diversity of the veteran population, including Indigenous, homeless, and urban veterans, and (e) virtual DBT-SG options hold promise for expanding reach and access and must be implemented with appropriate risk management. Enthusiasm for DBT-SG was high, and implementation challenges in a stressed health care system were noted. DBT-SG, especially delivered virtually, holds promise for VHA and will need to be implemented with attention to staffing, provider needs, and veteran diversity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staff perspectives on implementing dialectical behavior therapy skills groups in the Veterans Health Administration.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne E Decker, Kristin M Mattocks, Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers, Frances M Aunon, Lorrie Walker, Elizabeth Galliford, Neal Doran, Scarlett Baird, Jennifer K Rielage, Joseph Sadek, Josephine Ridley, Jenny Bannister, Thorayya S Giovannelli, Sara J Landes, Marianne Goodman, Eric DeRycke, Chris Shriver, Ethan Spana, Mark Honsberger, Stacey A Demirelli, Elena Shest, Steve Martino\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reducing veteran suicide is a high priority for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). While dialectical behavior therapy skills groups (DBT-SG) may be as effective as comprehensive DBT in reducing suicide attempt, barriers and facilitators to this innovation in VHA are not well known. In preparation for a hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial, we conducted individual semistructured qualitative interviews with 35 VHA staff (therapists, suicide prevention coordinators, local and national leaders) and identified themes using rapid qualitative analysis (Hamilton, 2013). Five themes emerged: (a) While leadership noted wanting innovative suicide prevention, (b) knowledge of DBT varied widely across respondents. (c) Implementation challenges, especially after COVID-19, included staff shortage and burnout. (d) DBT-SG may require adaptation to fit the diversity of the veteran population, including Indigenous, homeless, and urban veterans, and (e) virtual DBT-SG options hold promise for expanding reach and access and must be implemented with appropriate risk management. Enthusiasm for DBT-SG was high, and implementation challenges in a stressed health care system were noted. DBT-SG, especially delivered virtually, holds promise for VHA and will need to be implemented with attention to staffing, provider needs, and veteran diversity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000960\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
减少退伍军人自杀是退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的重中之重。虽然辩证行为治疗技能小组(DBT- sg)在减少自杀企图方面可能与综合DBT一样有效,但VHA中这种创新的障碍和促进因素并不为人所知。为了准备混合型1有效性实施试验,我们对35名VHA工作人员(治疗师、自杀预防协调员、地方和国家领导人)进行了单独的半结构化定性访谈,并使用快速定性分析确定了主题(Hamilton, 2013)。出现了五个主题:(a)虽然领导层指出需要创新的自杀预防,(b)受访者对DBT的了解差异很大。(c)实施方面的挑战,特别是在2019冠状病毒病之后,包括工作人员短缺和职业倦怠。(d) DBT-SG可能需要进行调整,以适应退伍军人人口的多样性,包括土著、无家可归者和城市退伍军人;(e)虚拟DBT-SG选项有望扩大覆盖范围和使用范围,必须在适当的风险管理下实施。人们对DBT-SG的热情很高,并注意到在压力很大的卫生保健系统中实施挑战。DBT-SG,特别是虚拟交付的DBT-SG,为VHA带来了希望,但在实施时需要注意人员配置、供应商需求和退伍军人多样性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Staff perspectives on implementing dialectical behavior therapy skills groups in the Veterans Health Administration.
Reducing veteran suicide is a high priority for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). While dialectical behavior therapy skills groups (DBT-SG) may be as effective as comprehensive DBT in reducing suicide attempt, barriers and facilitators to this innovation in VHA are not well known. In preparation for a hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial, we conducted individual semistructured qualitative interviews with 35 VHA staff (therapists, suicide prevention coordinators, local and national leaders) and identified themes using rapid qualitative analysis (Hamilton, 2013). Five themes emerged: (a) While leadership noted wanting innovative suicide prevention, (b) knowledge of DBT varied widely across respondents. (c) Implementation challenges, especially after COVID-19, included staff shortage and burnout. (d) DBT-SG may require adaptation to fit the diversity of the veteran population, including Indigenous, homeless, and urban veterans, and (e) virtual DBT-SG options hold promise for expanding reach and access and must be implemented with appropriate risk management. Enthusiasm for DBT-SG was high, and implementation challenges in a stressed health care system were noted. DBT-SG, especially delivered virtually, holds promise for VHA and will need to be implemented with attention to staffing, provider needs, and veteran diversity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.