展望甜美的未来:印尼糖和营养政策的政治经济分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ellen Johnson, Hafizah Jusril, Liza Pratiwi, Suci Trisnasari, Anne Marie Thow, Cut Novianti Rachmi
{"title":"展望甜美的未来:印尼糖和营养政策的政治经济分析。","authors":"Ellen Johnson, Hafizah Jusril, Liza Pratiwi, Suci Trisnasari, Anne Marie Thow, Cut Novianti Rachmi","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025100566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify politico-economic factors relating to policy surrounding the production, processing, and trade of sugar in Indonesia, and to identify strategies to support improved integration national nutrition and food security priorities with respect to sugar.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was a qualitative policy analysis, informed by political economy and power analysis approaches, and drawing on both documentary policy data and interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Interviewees from various national and sub-national government, and non-government sectors, with expertise in health and food safety (n=7), finance and economics (n=2), trade and industry (n=3) and other (n=4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sugar was articulated as a policy priority in three distinct ways: (1) sugar as an economic good; (2) sugar in relation to health and; (3) sugar as a commodity for food security. High political priority was given to national economic development, as well as concerns relating to farmer rights and welfare. Nutrition priorities and objectives to reduce sugar consumption were addressed in health policies; however, they were not reflected in production and economic policies promoting sugar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Creating opportunities to diversify agricultural production and ensuring a just transition to protect the livelihoods of sugar farmers in Indonesia will be crucial in enabling achievement of nutrition priorities to reduce sugar consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking towards the sweet, sweet future: a political economy analysis of sugar and nutrition policy in Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Johnson, Hafizah Jusril, Liza Pratiwi, Suci Trisnasari, Anne Marie Thow, Cut Novianti Rachmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1368980025100566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify politico-economic factors relating to policy surrounding the production, processing, and trade of sugar in Indonesia, and to identify strategies to support improved integration national nutrition and food security priorities with respect to sugar.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was a qualitative policy analysis, informed by political economy and power analysis approaches, and drawing on both documentary policy data and interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Interviewees from various national and sub-national government, and non-government sectors, with expertise in health and food safety (n=7), finance and economics (n=2), trade and industry (n=3) and other (n=4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sugar was articulated as a policy priority in three distinct ways: (1) sugar as an economic good; (2) sugar in relation to health and; (3) sugar as a commodity for food security. High political priority was given to national economic development, as well as concerns relating to farmer rights and welfare. Nutrition priorities and objectives to reduce sugar consumption were addressed in health policies; however, they were not reflected in production and economic policies promoting sugar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Creating opportunities to diversify agricultural production and ensuring a just transition to protect the livelihoods of sugar farmers in Indonesia will be crucial in enabling achievement of nutrition priorities to reduce sugar consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025100566\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025100566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定与印尼食糖生产、加工和贸易政策相关的政治经济因素,并确定支持在食糖方面改善国家营养和粮食安全优先事项整合的战略。设计:本研究是一项定性政策分析,采用政治经济学和权力分析方法,并利用文献政策数据和访谈。设置:印尼。参与者:来自各个国家和地方政府以及非政府部门的受访者,具有卫生和食品安全(n=7)、金融和经济(n=2)、贸易和工业(n=3)和其他(n=4)方面的专业知识。结果:糖被明确地以三种不同的方式作为政策重点:(1)糖作为一种经济商品;(二)与健康有关的糖;(3)糖作为保障粮食安全的商品。对国家经济发展以及对农民权利和福利的关切给予了高度的政治优先。在卫生政策中处理了减少糖消费的营养优先事项和目标;然而,它们并没有反映在促进糖的生产和经济政策中。结论:创造机会实现农业生产多样化,并确保公平过渡以保护印尼糖农的生计,对于实现减少糖消费的营养优先事项至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Looking towards the sweet, sweet future: a political economy analysis of sugar and nutrition policy in Indonesia.

Objective: To identify politico-economic factors relating to policy surrounding the production, processing, and trade of sugar in Indonesia, and to identify strategies to support improved integration national nutrition and food security priorities with respect to sugar.

Design: This study was a qualitative policy analysis, informed by political economy and power analysis approaches, and drawing on both documentary policy data and interviews.

Setting: Indonesia.

Participants: Interviewees from various national and sub-national government, and non-government sectors, with expertise in health and food safety (n=7), finance and economics (n=2), trade and industry (n=3) and other (n=4).

Results: Sugar was articulated as a policy priority in three distinct ways: (1) sugar as an economic good; (2) sugar in relation to health and; (3) sugar as a commodity for food security. High political priority was given to national economic development, as well as concerns relating to farmer rights and welfare. Nutrition priorities and objectives to reduce sugar consumption were addressed in health policies; however, they were not reflected in production and economic policies promoting sugar.

Conclusions: Creating opportunities to diversify agricultural production and ensuring a just transition to protect the livelihoods of sugar farmers in Indonesia will be crucial in enabling achievement of nutrition priorities to reduce sugar consumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信