定性方法在实验设计中的应用:行为科学教程。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324936
Hidde Jelmer Leplaa, Jari A Tönjes, Mariska Bouterse, Karlijn F B Soppe, Irene Klugkist
{"title":"定性方法在实验设计中的应用:行为科学教程。","authors":"Hidde Jelmer Leplaa, Jari A Tönjes, Mariska Bouterse, Karlijn F B Soppe, Irene Klugkist","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0324936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies with experimental designs are almost invariably evaluated with quantitative outcomes and methods, both in behavioral sciences and other disciplines. We argue that there can be added value of using qualitative methods for the evaluation of (behavioral) experiments. Incorporating qualitative data can enhance the ecological validity of a study, by acquiring a more holistic understanding of the phenomenon of interest. There is, however, little methodological guidance on how to implement such an approach. In this paper we present the different steps and considerations for a qualitative evaluation of results in experimental designs. Methodological guidelines are offered for each stage of a study, from formulation of the research goals, through data collection and data analysis, to the interpretation of a potential effect of the intervention. In addition, there is ample attention for ensuring the rigor of the research. The presented guidelines are developed and illustrated using an empirical example, in which a constructivist grounded theory approach was applied to evaluate the effect of empathy prompts on the motivation to adhere to COVID-19 regulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0324936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying qualitative methods to experimental designs: A tutorial for the behavioral sciences.\",\"authors\":\"Hidde Jelmer Leplaa, Jari A Tönjes, Mariska Bouterse, Karlijn F B Soppe, Irene Klugkist\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0324936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies with experimental designs are almost invariably evaluated with quantitative outcomes and methods, both in behavioral sciences and other disciplines. We argue that there can be added value of using qualitative methods for the evaluation of (behavioral) experiments. Incorporating qualitative data can enhance the ecological validity of a study, by acquiring a more holistic understanding of the phenomenon of interest. There is, however, little methodological guidance on how to implement such an approach. In this paper we present the different steps and considerations for a qualitative evaluation of results in experimental designs. Methodological guidelines are offered for each stage of a study, from formulation of the research goals, through data collection and data analysis, to the interpretation of a potential effect of the intervention. In addition, there is ample attention for ensuring the rigor of the research. The presented guidelines are developed and illustrated using an empirical example, in which a constructivist grounded theory approach was applied to evaluate the effect of empathy prompts on the motivation to adhere to COVID-19 regulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0324936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169552/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324936\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在行为科学和其他学科中,具有实验设计的研究几乎总是用定量结果和方法进行评估。我们认为,使用定性方法来评估(行为)实验可以增加价值。通过对感兴趣的现象获得更全面的理解,结合定性数据可以增强研究的生态有效性。然而,关于如何实施这种方法的方法指导很少。在本文中,我们提出了对实验设计结果进行定性评价的不同步骤和考虑因素。从研究目标的制定,到数据收集和数据分析,再到对干预措施的潜在影响的解释,研究的每个阶段都提供了方法学指南。此外,确保研究的严谨性也得到了充分的关注。本文通过一个实证例子制定并说明了所提出的指导方针,其中应用了建构主义扎根理论方法来评估共情提示对遵守COVID-19法规的动机的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Applying qualitative methods to experimental designs: A tutorial for the behavioral sciences.

Applying qualitative methods to experimental designs: A tutorial for the behavioral sciences.

Applying qualitative methods to experimental designs: A tutorial for the behavioral sciences.

Applying qualitative methods to experimental designs: A tutorial for the behavioral sciences.

Studies with experimental designs are almost invariably evaluated with quantitative outcomes and methods, both in behavioral sciences and other disciplines. We argue that there can be added value of using qualitative methods for the evaluation of (behavioral) experiments. Incorporating qualitative data can enhance the ecological validity of a study, by acquiring a more holistic understanding of the phenomenon of interest. There is, however, little methodological guidance on how to implement such an approach. In this paper we present the different steps and considerations for a qualitative evaluation of results in experimental designs. Methodological guidelines are offered for each stage of a study, from formulation of the research goals, through data collection and data analysis, to the interpretation of a potential effect of the intervention. In addition, there is ample attention for ensuring the rigor of the research. The presented guidelines are developed and illustrated using an empirical example, in which a constructivist grounded theory approach was applied to evaluate the effect of empathy prompts on the motivation to adhere to COVID-19 regulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信