腹旁神经阻滞有效控制腹腔镜袖胃切除术后内脏疼痛。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Dongwon Lim, Yoona Chung, Bomina Paik, Yong Jin Kim
{"title":"腹旁神经阻滞有效控制腹腔镜袖胃切除术后内脏疼痛。","authors":"Dongwon Lim, Yoona Chung, Bomina Paik, Yong Jin Kim","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07991-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical advancements and the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have contributed to reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. Despite these improvements in perioperative care, pain remains one of the most distressing symptoms, particularly during the early postoperative period. Visceral pain (VP), rather than somatic pain, is the predominant source of discomfort and is often difficult to manage with standard pain control methods. This study aims to replicate the findings of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of paragastric neural blockade (PGNB) in controlling VP, addressing the ongoing clinical challenge of inadequate pain control despite standard multimodal analgesia (MMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted from January to September 2024, comparing a control group (standard MMA including transversus abdominis plane [TAP] block, n=50) with a PGNB group (same protocol plus PGNB, n=50). The primary outcome was pain intensity (Numeric rating scale [NRS] score 0-10) within 48 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included time to first analgesic use, cumulative analgesic doses, nausea/vomiting incidence, and hemodynamic changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NRS scores were significantly lower in the PGNB group within 8 hours postoperatively (p<0.001). The time to first rescue analgesic use was prolonged (1084.08±902.78 minutes vs. 260.60±482.25 minutes; p<0.001) and the cumulative frequency of analgesic use on the day of surgery was also lower in the PGNB group (0.46 times vs. 1.34 times; p<0.001). No significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were observed on postoperative days (PODs) 0 and 2, although POD 1 showed higher nausea in the PGNB group (p=0.002). The operative time was significantly longer in the PGNB group (113.90±14.54 minutes vs. 97.86±20.78 minutes; p<0.001). There was one case of localized hematoma at the injection site, which was controlled with local compression and resolved within a few minutes. No other complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PGNB effectively reduces VP and the need for rescue analgesics during the early postoperative period following LSG, without any major complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paragastric Neural Blockade Effectively Controls Visceral Pain After Primary Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Dongwon Lim, Yoona Chung, Bomina Paik, Yong Jin Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-07991-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical advancements and the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have contributed to reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. Despite these improvements in perioperative care, pain remains one of the most distressing symptoms, particularly during the early postoperative period. Visceral pain (VP), rather than somatic pain, is the predominant source of discomfort and is often difficult to manage with standard pain control methods. This study aims to replicate the findings of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of paragastric neural blockade (PGNB) in controlling VP, addressing the ongoing clinical challenge of inadequate pain control despite standard multimodal analgesia (MMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted from January to September 2024, comparing a control group (standard MMA including transversus abdominis plane [TAP] block, n=50) with a PGNB group (same protocol plus PGNB, n=50). The primary outcome was pain intensity (Numeric rating scale [NRS] score 0-10) within 48 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included time to first analgesic use, cumulative analgesic doses, nausea/vomiting incidence, and hemodynamic changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NRS scores were significantly lower in the PGNB group within 8 hours postoperatively (p<0.001). The time to first rescue analgesic use was prolonged (1084.08±902.78 minutes vs. 260.60±482.25 minutes; p<0.001) and the cumulative frequency of analgesic use on the day of surgery was also lower in the PGNB group (0.46 times vs. 1.34 times; p<0.001). No significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were observed on postoperative days (PODs) 0 and 2, although POD 1 showed higher nausea in the PGNB group (p=0.002). The operative time was significantly longer in the PGNB group (113.90±14.54 minutes vs. 97.86±20.78 minutes; p<0.001). There was one case of localized hematoma at the injection site, which was controlled with local compression and resolved within a few minutes. No other complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PGNB effectively reduces VP and the need for rescue analgesics during the early postoperative period following LSG, without any major complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07991-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07991-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外科手术的进步和增强术后恢复(ERAS)协议的实施有助于减少术后疼痛和更快的恢复。尽管围手术期护理有了这些改进,但疼痛仍然是最令人痛苦的症状之一,特别是在术后早期。内脏疼痛(VP),而不是躯体疼痛,是不适的主要来源,通常很难用标准的疼痛控制方法来管理。本研究旨在重复之前的随机对照试验(rct)的研究结果,研究经旁神经阻断(PGNB)在控制VP中的有效性,解决了尽管标准多模态镇痛(MMA)仍存在疼痛控制不足的临床挑战。方法:于2024年1月至9月进行回顾性研究,将对照组(标准MMA包括腹横平面[TAP]阻滞,n=50)与PGNB组(相同方案加PGNB, n=50)进行比较。主要预后指标为术后48小时内疼痛强度(数值评定量表[NRS]评分0-10)。次要结局包括首次使用镇痛药的时间、累积镇痛剂量、恶心/呕吐发生率和血流动力学变化。结果:PGNB组术后8小时内NRS评分明显降低(p结论:PGNB可有效降低LSG术后早期VP及抢救镇痛药需求,无重大并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paragastric Neural Blockade Effectively Controls Visceral Pain After Primary Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Background: Surgical advancements and the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have contributed to reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. Despite these improvements in perioperative care, pain remains one of the most distressing symptoms, particularly during the early postoperative period. Visceral pain (VP), rather than somatic pain, is the predominant source of discomfort and is often difficult to manage with standard pain control methods. This study aims to replicate the findings of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of paragastric neural blockade (PGNB) in controlling VP, addressing the ongoing clinical challenge of inadequate pain control despite standard multimodal analgesia (MMA).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from January to September 2024, comparing a control group (standard MMA including transversus abdominis plane [TAP] block, n=50) with a PGNB group (same protocol plus PGNB, n=50). The primary outcome was pain intensity (Numeric rating scale [NRS] score 0-10) within 48 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included time to first analgesic use, cumulative analgesic doses, nausea/vomiting incidence, and hemodynamic changes.

Results: NRS scores were significantly lower in the PGNB group within 8 hours postoperatively (p<0.001). The time to first rescue analgesic use was prolonged (1084.08±902.78 minutes vs. 260.60±482.25 minutes; p<0.001) and the cumulative frequency of analgesic use on the day of surgery was also lower in the PGNB group (0.46 times vs. 1.34 times; p<0.001). No significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were observed on postoperative days (PODs) 0 and 2, although POD 1 showed higher nausea in the PGNB group (p=0.002). The operative time was significantly longer in the PGNB group (113.90±14.54 minutes vs. 97.86±20.78 minutes; p<0.001). There was one case of localized hematoma at the injection site, which was controlled with local compression and resolved within a few minutes. No other complications were observed.

Conclusion: PGNB effectively reduces VP and the need for rescue analgesics during the early postoperative period following LSG, without any major complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信