{"title":"肺超声作为临床怀疑间质性肺疾病患者筛查工具的应用。","authors":"Saikat Banerjee, Ganesh Sanjan, Prakash Sivaramakrishnan, Girish Sindhwani, Venkatesh Pai, Poonam Sherwani, Prakhar Sharma","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is primarily based on clinico-radiological findings, often requiring multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) for confirmation. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a safe, non-invasive, bedside tool that has been explored for ILD assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a hospital-based, single-center, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study on patients with clinical suspicion of ILD. All patients underwent routine blood tests, lung function tests, LUS, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) following a standardized protocol. LUS assessed pleural abnormalities, including thickening, shredding, and B-lines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 56 patients (mean age 54.79 ± 11.88 years) with a female predominance (57.14%). Diagnoses included connective tissue disease-related ILD (26.79%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (21.43%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (12.50%), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (10.71%), sarcoidosis (7.14%), and no ILD (17.86%). LUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.30%, specificity of 80.00%, diagnostic accuracy of 89.29%, and a diagnostic odds ratio of 41.55. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for ultrasound B-lines had an AUC of 0.941 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LUS B-lines score is a promising screening tool for ILD, with high diagnostic accuracy. Its bedside applicability makes it a valuable \"point-of-care\" test in ILD evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Lung Ultrasound as a Screening Tool in Patients With Clinical Suspicion of Interstitial Lung Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Saikat Banerjee, Ganesh Sanjan, Prakash Sivaramakrishnan, Girish Sindhwani, Venkatesh Pai, Poonam Sherwani, Prakhar Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is primarily based on clinico-radiological findings, often requiring multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) for confirmation. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a safe, non-invasive, bedside tool that has been explored for ILD assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a hospital-based, single-center, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study on patients with clinical suspicion of ILD. All patients underwent routine blood tests, lung function tests, LUS, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) following a standardized protocol. LUS assessed pleural abnormalities, including thickening, shredding, and B-lines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 56 patients (mean age 54.79 ± 11.88 years) with a female predominance (57.14%). Diagnoses included connective tissue disease-related ILD (26.79%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (21.43%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (12.50%), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (10.71%), sarcoidosis (7.14%), and no ILD (17.86%). LUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.30%, specificity of 80.00%, diagnostic accuracy of 89.29%, and a diagnostic odds ratio of 41.55. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for ultrasound B-lines had an AUC of 0.941 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LUS B-lines score is a promising screening tool for ILD, with high diagnostic accuracy. Its bedside applicability makes it a valuable \\\"point-of-care\\\" test in ILD evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utility of Lung Ultrasound as a Screening Tool in Patients With Clinical Suspicion of Interstitial Lung Disease.
Purpose: The diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is primarily based on clinico-radiological findings, often requiring multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) for confirmation. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a safe, non-invasive, bedside tool that has been explored for ILD assessment.
Methods: We conducted a hospital-based, single-center, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study on patients with clinical suspicion of ILD. All patients underwent routine blood tests, lung function tests, LUS, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) following a standardized protocol. LUS assessed pleural abnormalities, including thickening, shredding, and B-lines.
Results: The study included 56 patients (mean age 54.79 ± 11.88 years) with a female predominance (57.14%). Diagnoses included connective tissue disease-related ILD (26.79%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (21.43%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (12.50%), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (10.71%), sarcoidosis (7.14%), and no ILD (17.86%). LUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.30%, specificity of 80.00%, diagnostic accuracy of 89.29%, and a diagnostic odds ratio of 41.55. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for ultrasound B-lines had an AUC of 0.941 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The LUS B-lines score is a promising screening tool for ILD, with high diagnostic accuracy. Its bedside applicability makes it a valuable "point-of-care" test in ILD evaluation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.