评估种族和性别的交叉性及其对心脏移植公平性的影响,列出结果和分配政策。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahad Firoz, Huaqing Zhao, Xiaoning Lu, Eman Hamad
{"title":"评估种族和性别的交叉性及其对心脏移植公平性的影响,列出结果和分配政策。","authors":"Ahad Firoz, Huaqing Zhao, Xiaoning Lu, Eman Hamad","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there are existing studies on the role of race- and gender-based disparities as one-dimensional elements in heart transplantation (HTx), few reports have examined the intersection of such identities. Our study investigates the intersectionality of race and gender, and its impact on HTx waitlist outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from adult patients listed for orthotopic HTx between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Inclusion criteria included \"White\" and \"Black\" races. Exclusion criteria included missing data in race or gender, a previous history of HTx, or concurrent listing for other transplants. Four groups were created using a combination of race and gender. Waitlist outcomes of interest include transplantation and death using competing-risk models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 37,796 patients were included in this analysis, of which 55.1 % were White-male (M), 17.4 % White-female (F), 18.6 % Black-M, and 8.9 % Black-F. Relative to White-M, Black-M (HR = 0.86, p < 0.001) and Black-F (HR = 0.82, p < 0.001) had decreased odds of transplantation. In the survival models, both female groups had a decreased mortality risk compared to White-M (White-F: HR = 0.56, p = 0.001; Black-F: HR = 0.61, p = 0.008) and Black-M (White-F: HR = 0.60, p = 0.005; Black-F: HR = 0.64, p = 0.025). Following the 2018 policy changes, with reference to White-F, Black-M (0.94, p = 0.189) had comparable odds of HTx while Black-F (HR = 0.91, p = 0.618) had a similar pattern of survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities on the HTx waiting list continue to exist. Black patients had decreased odds of transplantation compared to White groups. Additionally, females had superior overall survival on the waitlist. Although outcomes appear to have improved marginally for some vulnerable groups in the new allocation system, further work is required to achieve equity on the heart transplant waiting list.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the intersectionality of race and gender and its impact on heart transplant equity, listing outcomes, and allocation policy.\",\"authors\":\"Ahad Firoz, Huaqing Zhao, Xiaoning Lu, Eman Hamad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there are existing studies on the role of race- and gender-based disparities as one-dimensional elements in heart transplantation (HTx), few reports have examined the intersection of such identities. Our study investigates the intersectionality of race and gender, and its impact on HTx waitlist outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from adult patients listed for orthotopic HTx between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Inclusion criteria included \\\"White\\\" and \\\"Black\\\" races. Exclusion criteria included missing data in race or gender, a previous history of HTx, or concurrent listing for other transplants. Four groups were created using a combination of race and gender. Waitlist outcomes of interest include transplantation and death using competing-risk models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 37,796 patients were included in this analysis, of which 55.1 % were White-male (M), 17.4 % White-female (F), 18.6 % Black-M, and 8.9 % Black-F. Relative to White-M, Black-M (HR = 0.86, p < 0.001) and Black-F (HR = 0.82, p < 0.001) had decreased odds of transplantation. In the survival models, both female groups had a decreased mortality risk compared to White-M (White-F: HR = 0.56, p = 0.001; Black-F: HR = 0.61, p = 0.008) and Black-M (White-F: HR = 0.60, p = 0.005; Black-F: HR = 0.64, p = 0.025). Following the 2018 policy changes, with reference to White-F, Black-M (0.94, p = 0.189) had comparable odds of HTx while Black-F (HR = 0.91, p = 0.618) had a similar pattern of survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities on the HTx waiting list continue to exist. Black patients had decreased odds of transplantation compared to White groups. Additionally, females had superior overall survival on the waitlist. Although outcomes appear to have improved marginally for some vulnerable groups in the new allocation system, further work is required to achieve equity on the heart transplant waiting list.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.06.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.06.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然已有关于种族和性别差异作为心脏移植(HTx)的一维因素的研究,但很少有报道检查了这些身份的交集。我们的研究调查了种族和性别的交叉性,及其对HTx候补名单结果的影响。方法:使用美国器官共享网络数据库对2010年至2023年成人原位HTx患者的数据进行分析。入选标准包括“白人”和“黑人”种族。排除标准包括种族或性别数据缺失、既往HTx病史或其他移植同时上市。根据种族和性别组合创建了四组。候选结果包括使用竞争风险模型的移植和死亡。结果:共纳入37796例患者,其中55.1% %为白人男性(M), 17.4% %为白人女性(F), 18.6% %为黑人-M, 8.9 %为黑人-F。相对于White-M, Black-M (HR = 0.86,p )结论:HTx候诊名单上的差异仍然存在。与白人患者相比,黑人患者移植的几率降低。此外,女性在等待名单上的总体存活率更高。虽然在新的分配制度下,一些弱势群体的结果似乎有所改善,但在心脏移植等待名单上实现公平还需要进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the intersectionality of race and gender and its impact on heart transplant equity, listing outcomes, and allocation policy.

Background: Although there are existing studies on the role of race- and gender-based disparities as one-dimensional elements in heart transplantation (HTx), few reports have examined the intersection of such identities. Our study investigates the intersectionality of race and gender, and its impact on HTx waitlist outcomes.

Methods: Data from adult patients listed for orthotopic HTx between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Inclusion criteria included "White" and "Black" races. Exclusion criteria included missing data in race or gender, a previous history of HTx, or concurrent listing for other transplants. Four groups were created using a combination of race and gender. Waitlist outcomes of interest include transplantation and death using competing-risk models.

Results: In total, 37,796 patients were included in this analysis, of which 55.1 % were White-male (M), 17.4 % White-female (F), 18.6 % Black-M, and 8.9 % Black-F. Relative to White-M, Black-M (HR = 0.86, p < 0.001) and Black-F (HR = 0.82, p < 0.001) had decreased odds of transplantation. In the survival models, both female groups had a decreased mortality risk compared to White-M (White-F: HR = 0.56, p = 0.001; Black-F: HR = 0.61, p = 0.008) and Black-M (White-F: HR = 0.60, p = 0.005; Black-F: HR = 0.64, p = 0.025). Following the 2018 policy changes, with reference to White-F, Black-M (0.94, p = 0.189) had comparable odds of HTx while Black-F (HR = 0.91, p = 0.618) had a similar pattern of survival.

Conclusion: Disparities on the HTx waiting list continue to exist. Black patients had decreased odds of transplantation compared to White groups. Additionally, females had superior overall survival on the waitlist. Although outcomes appear to have improved marginally for some vulnerable groups in the new allocation system, further work is required to achieve equity on the heart transplant waiting list.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信