{"title":"哮喘患者高强度与低强度呼吸肌训练：对呼吸肌、运动表现、呼吸困难和健康相关生活质量的影响","authors":"Cahidenur Kocak, Esra Pehlivan, Seyma Baslilar","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2025.2519103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of high- and low-intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) combined with standard pulmonary rehabilitation on respiratory muscle function, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life in asthmatic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty asthmatic patients were randomized into high-intensity IMT (H-IMT, <i>n</i> = 20) and low-intensity IMT (L-IMT, <i>n</i> = 20) groups. The H-IMT group trained at 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure and the L-IMT group at 30%, with 5% weekly load increases. Both groups followed an 8-week exercise program including breathing, strengthening, and walking exercises. Respiratory functions, pulmonary function test, respiratory muscle strength, maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure measurement, peripheral muscle strength, 6-min walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea and Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Saint George Respiratory Quality of Life Questionnaire (SGRQ) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scores were assessed pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar. Both groups improved in most outcomes except spirometric values. The L-IMT group showed significant gains in IPAQ-SF walking (<i>p</i> = .03) and total scores (<i>p</i> = .02). 6MWT distance, mMRC, and ACT scores improved significantly more in the H-IMT group compared to the L-IMT group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Similarly, when the groups were compared, AQLQ-Environmental, AQLQ-Total, SGRQ-Impact, SGRQ-Total scores showed more improvement in the H-IMT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both IMT intensities improved respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. High-intensity IMT was more effective for asthma control, while low-intensity IMT enhanced physical activity. Tailoring IMT intensity may optimize outcomes for asthmatic patients.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT06516848.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1776-1788"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High- <i>vs.</i> low-intensity inspiratory muscle training in asthma: effects on respiratory muscles, exercise performance, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life.\",\"authors\":\"Cahidenur Kocak, Esra Pehlivan, Seyma Baslilar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02770903.2025.2519103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of high- and low-intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) combined with standard pulmonary rehabilitation on respiratory muscle function, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life in asthmatic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty asthmatic patients were randomized into high-intensity IMT (H-IMT, <i>n</i> = 20) and low-intensity IMT (L-IMT, <i>n</i> = 20) groups. The H-IMT group trained at 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure and the L-IMT group at 30%, with 5% weekly load increases. Both groups followed an 8-week exercise program including breathing, strengthening, and walking exercises. Respiratory functions, pulmonary function test, respiratory muscle strength, maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure measurement, peripheral muscle strength, 6-min walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea and Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Saint George Respiratory Quality of Life Questionnaire (SGRQ) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scores were assessed pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar. Both groups improved in most outcomes except spirometric values. The L-IMT group showed significant gains in IPAQ-SF walking (<i>p</i> = .03) and total scores (<i>p</i> = .02). 6MWT distance, mMRC, and ACT scores improved significantly more in the H-IMT group compared to the L-IMT group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Similarly, when the groups were compared, AQLQ-Environmental, AQLQ-Total, SGRQ-Impact, SGRQ-Total scores showed more improvement in the H-IMT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both IMT intensities improved respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. High-intensity IMT was more effective for asthma control, while low-intensity IMT enhanced physical activity. Tailoring IMT intensity may optimize outcomes for asthmatic patients.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT06516848.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1776-1788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2519103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2519103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
High- vs. low-intensity inspiratory muscle training in asthma: effects on respiratory muscles, exercise performance, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life.
Objective: To compare the effects of high- and low-intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) combined with standard pulmonary rehabilitation on respiratory muscle function, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life in asthmatic patients.
Methods: Forty asthmatic patients were randomized into high-intensity IMT (H-IMT, n = 20) and low-intensity IMT (L-IMT, n = 20) groups. The H-IMT group trained at 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure and the L-IMT group at 30%, with 5% weekly load increases. Both groups followed an 8-week exercise program including breathing, strengthening, and walking exercises. Respiratory functions, pulmonary function test, respiratory muscle strength, maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure measurement, peripheral muscle strength, 6-min walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea and Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Saint George Respiratory Quality of Life Questionnaire (SGRQ) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scores were assessed pre- and post-intervention.
Results: Baseline characteristics were similar. Both groups improved in most outcomes except spirometric values. The L-IMT group showed significant gains in IPAQ-SF walking (p = .03) and total scores (p = .02). 6MWT distance, mMRC, and ACT scores improved significantly more in the H-IMT group compared to the L-IMT group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, when the groups were compared, AQLQ-Environmental, AQLQ-Total, SGRQ-Impact, SGRQ-Total scores showed more improvement in the H-IMT group.
Conclusion: Both IMT intensities improved respiratory function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. High-intensity IMT was more effective for asthma control, while low-intensity IMT enhanced physical activity. Tailoring IMT intensity may optimize outcomes for asthmatic patients.
期刊介绍：
Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
