Jozélio Freire de Carvalho, Ana Tereza Amoedo Martinez
{"title":"溴隐亭在风湿病中的研究进展","authors":"Jozélio Freire de Carvalho, Ana Tereza Amoedo Martinez","doi":"10.5152/eurjrheum.2025.24080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hyperprolactinemia is frequent in rheumatic diseases. Bromocriptine (BRC) is an antagonist of pro- lactin and was studied in a few rheumatic diseases with controversial results. The aim of the present study was to review articles on BRC in rheumatic diseases. Articles on lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, pso- riatic arthritis (PsA), and reactive arthritis were found. Fourteen articles were found. In lupus, 5 articles evaluated BRC in a 2.5-7.5 mg/day dosage. The follow-up varied from 6 to 14 months. They showed improvement in lupus disease activity (Lupus Disease Activity Index or Lupus activity measure scores) in 4/5; a trend was verified in another article, 1/5, and one study evaluated improvement in the mood of the systemic lupus erythematosus patients. In RA, there are 4 articles with 119 patients. The BRC dosage ranged from 5 mg/day to 10 mg TID. About 2/4 of the articles showed improvements [morn- ing stiffness and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], and 2/4 did not show any difference. Regarding PsA and reactive arthritis, 5 articles with 43 patients were found. The BRC dose varied from 2.5 to 30 mg/day. All studies showed improvements of the studied diseases. Side effects were mild and infrequent. In conclusion, BRC seems to be efficacious in a few rheumatic diseases (lupus, PsA, RA, and Reiter's), with mild side effects. Future studies with a larger number of participants and in other rheumatic diseases are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12066,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology","volume":"12 2","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bromocriptine in Rheumatic Diseases: A Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jozélio Freire de Carvalho, Ana Tereza Amoedo Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/eurjrheum.2025.24080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hyperprolactinemia is frequent in rheumatic diseases. Bromocriptine (BRC) is an antagonist of pro- lactin and was studied in a few rheumatic diseases with controversial results. The aim of the present study was to review articles on BRC in rheumatic diseases. Articles on lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, pso- riatic arthritis (PsA), and reactive arthritis were found. Fourteen articles were found. In lupus, 5 articles evaluated BRC in a 2.5-7.5 mg/day dosage. The follow-up varied from 6 to 14 months. They showed improvement in lupus disease activity (Lupus Disease Activity Index or Lupus activity measure scores) in 4/5; a trend was verified in another article, 1/5, and one study evaluated improvement in the mood of the systemic lupus erythematosus patients. In RA, there are 4 articles with 119 patients. The BRC dosage ranged from 5 mg/day to 10 mg TID. About 2/4 of the articles showed improvements [morn- ing stiffness and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], and 2/4 did not show any difference. Regarding PsA and reactive arthritis, 5 articles with 43 patients were found. The BRC dose varied from 2.5 to 30 mg/day. All studies showed improvements of the studied diseases. Side effects were mild and infrequent. In conclusion, BRC seems to be efficacious in a few rheumatic diseases (lupus, PsA, RA, and Reiter's), with mild side effects. Future studies with a larger number of participants and in other rheumatic diseases are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2025.24080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2025.24080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hyperprolactinemia is frequent in rheumatic diseases. Bromocriptine (BRC) is an antagonist of pro- lactin and was studied in a few rheumatic diseases with controversial results. The aim of the present study was to review articles on BRC in rheumatic diseases. Articles on lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, pso- riatic arthritis (PsA), and reactive arthritis were found. Fourteen articles were found. In lupus, 5 articles evaluated BRC in a 2.5-7.5 mg/day dosage. The follow-up varied from 6 to 14 months. They showed improvement in lupus disease activity (Lupus Disease Activity Index or Lupus activity measure scores) in 4/5; a trend was verified in another article, 1/5, and one study evaluated improvement in the mood of the systemic lupus erythematosus patients. In RA, there are 4 articles with 119 patients. The BRC dosage ranged from 5 mg/day to 10 mg TID. About 2/4 of the articles showed improvements [morn- ing stiffness and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], and 2/4 did not show any difference. Regarding PsA and reactive arthritis, 5 articles with 43 patients were found. The BRC dose varied from 2.5 to 30 mg/day. All studies showed improvements of the studied diseases. Side effects were mild and infrequent. In conclusion, BRC seems to be efficacious in a few rheumatic diseases (lupus, PsA, RA, and Reiter's), with mild side effects. Future studies with a larger number of participants and in other rheumatic diseases are needed.