静脉-动脉体外膜氧合。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001295
Uwe Zeymer, Dirk Westermann
{"title":"静脉-动脉体外膜氧合。","authors":"Uwe Zeymer, Dirk Westermann","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Despite improvements in reperfusion and adjunctive therapies cardiogenic shock associated with acute myocardial infarction is still associated with a mortality of 40-50%. Therefore, mechanical circulatory support devices are increasingly used. One option is veno-arterial extracorporal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). VA-ECMO can be implanted percutaneously and blood is actively pumped into a tubing system outside the body which also incorporates an artificial lung for oxygenation and removal of carbon dioxide and then sent back retrograde in the aorta. This review summarizes the current evidence for the use of VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Four randomized clinical trials including the large ECLS-SHOCK trial with 417 patients and two individual patient data meta-analyses did not show any mortality benefit with the routine use of VA-ECMO, but a consistent increase in bleeding and peripheral vascular ischemic complications. So far, patients with STEMI and a low likelihood of brain injury might be an attractive group for the use of VA-ECMO. In addition patients in need for oxygenation might benefit from VA-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The results of the ECLS-SHOCK trial and the meta-analyses call for a conservative approach regarding a routine unselected use of early VA-ECMO in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"473-479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.\",\"authors\":\"Uwe Zeymer, Dirk Westermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Despite improvements in reperfusion and adjunctive therapies cardiogenic shock associated with acute myocardial infarction is still associated with a mortality of 40-50%. Therefore, mechanical circulatory support devices are increasingly used. One option is veno-arterial extracorporal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). VA-ECMO can be implanted percutaneously and blood is actively pumped into a tubing system outside the body which also incorporates an artificial lung for oxygenation and removal of carbon dioxide and then sent back retrograde in the aorta. This review summarizes the current evidence for the use of VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Four randomized clinical trials including the large ECLS-SHOCK trial with 417 patients and two individual patient data meta-analyses did not show any mortality benefit with the routine use of VA-ECMO, but a consistent increase in bleeding and peripheral vascular ischemic complications. So far, patients with STEMI and a low likelihood of brain injury might be an attractive group for the use of VA-ECMO. In addition patients in need for oxygenation might benefit from VA-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The results of the ECLS-SHOCK trial and the meta-analyses call for a conservative approach regarding a routine unselected use of early VA-ECMO in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"473-479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001295\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾的目的:尽管再灌注和辅助治疗有所改善,心源性休克合并急性心肌梗死仍与40-50%的死亡率相关。因此,机械循环支撑装置的应用越来越多。一种选择是静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)。VA-ECMO可以经皮植入,血液被主动泵入体外的管道系统,该管道系统还包含一个人工肺,用于氧合和去除二氧化碳,然后逆行在主动脉中被送回。本文综述了目前在心源性休克中使用VA-ECMO的证据。最近的发现:4项随机临床试验,包括417例患者的大型ECLS-SHOCK试验和2例个体患者数据荟萃分析,均未显示常规使用VA-ECMO对死亡率有任何益处,但出血和外周血管缺血性并发症持续增加。到目前为止,STEMI和脑损伤可能性较低的患者可能是使用VA-ECMO的有吸引力的群体。此外,需要氧合的患者可能受益于VA-ECMO。总结:ECLS-SHOCK试验和荟萃分析的结果表明,对于梗死相关性心源性休克患者常规不选择使用早期VA-ECMO的保守方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Purpose of review: Despite improvements in reperfusion and adjunctive therapies cardiogenic shock associated with acute myocardial infarction is still associated with a mortality of 40-50%. Therefore, mechanical circulatory support devices are increasingly used. One option is veno-arterial extracorporal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). VA-ECMO can be implanted percutaneously and blood is actively pumped into a tubing system outside the body which also incorporates an artificial lung for oxygenation and removal of carbon dioxide and then sent back retrograde in the aorta. This review summarizes the current evidence for the use of VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock.

Recent findings: Four randomized clinical trials including the large ECLS-SHOCK trial with 417 patients and two individual patient data meta-analyses did not show any mortality benefit with the routine use of VA-ECMO, but a consistent increase in bleeding and peripheral vascular ischemic complications. So far, patients with STEMI and a low likelihood of brain injury might be an attractive group for the use of VA-ECMO. In addition patients in need for oxygenation might benefit from VA-ECMO.

Summary: The results of the ECLS-SHOCK trial and the meta-analyses call for a conservative approach regarding a routine unselected use of early VA-ECMO in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信