Bella Tsachidou, Magdalena Calusinska, Christophe Hissler, Jérôme Gennen, Benjamin Daigneux, Séverine Piutti, Alexandre Laflotte, Isabelle George, Philippe Delfosse
{"title":"不同氮肥对草地土壤细菌和真菌群落多样性和丰度的影响——以硫酸铵和磺胺肟处理为例","authors":"Bella Tsachidou, Magdalena Calusinska, Christophe Hissler, Jérôme Gennen, Benjamin Daigneux, Séverine Piutti, Alexandre Laflotte, Isabelle George, Philippe Delfosse","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improving agricultural productivity to meet the growing food and feed demand via nitrogen fertilization comes with trade-offs such as environmental pollution and biodiversity loss. Biogas residues (BRs) being a relatively new biofertilizer aiming at substituting chemical nitrogen fertilizers, have raised questions regarding their biosecurity and environmental footprint. In this study, we explored and compared the effect of repeated application of different nitrogen fertilizers on the bacterial and fungal α-diversity, relative abundance, β-diversity, and taxonomic composition in grassland soils over a period of two years. Given the paramount importance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable agriculture and climate change, we examined the relative abundance of Glomeromycota and their response to the different nitrogen fertilizers. Finally, the soil microbial community was scanned for the most prominent pathogens that are often detected in BRs and are the main concern related to their application on agricultural soils. Microbial communities in the soil were identified and quantified via high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA marker gene for bacteria, and the ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS2) region for fungi. Overall, the results suggest that the soil bacteriome is more sensitive than the mycobiome to nitrogen fertilization. Specifically, ammonium sulfate application appears to negatively impact bacterial alpha-diversity, while also altering the relative abundance of Glomeromycota, prompting us to question the potential involvement of the sulfammox process in the loss of soil microbial diversity. Notably, the application of biogas residues did not alter the diversity or abundance of soil microbial communities, nor harbored any significant pathogens; therefore, advocating for their safety and encouraging further research to validate their safe nature and beneficial properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Different Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Diversity and Abundance of Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Grassland Soils: The Emerging Case of Ammonium Sulfate and Sulfammox Process\",\"authors\":\"Bella Tsachidou, Magdalena Calusinska, Christophe Hissler, Jérôme Gennen, Benjamin Daigneux, Séverine Piutti, Alexandre Laflotte, Isabelle George, Philippe Delfosse\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Improving agricultural productivity to meet the growing food and feed demand via nitrogen fertilization comes with trade-offs such as environmental pollution and biodiversity loss. Biogas residues (BRs) being a relatively new biofertilizer aiming at substituting chemical nitrogen fertilizers, have raised questions regarding their biosecurity and environmental footprint. In this study, we explored and compared the effect of repeated application of different nitrogen fertilizers on the bacterial and fungal α-diversity, relative abundance, β-diversity, and taxonomic composition in grassland soils over a period of two years. Given the paramount importance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable agriculture and climate change, we examined the relative abundance of Glomeromycota and their response to the different nitrogen fertilizers. Finally, the soil microbial community was scanned for the most prominent pathogens that are often detected in BRs and are the main concern related to their application on agricultural soils. Microbial communities in the soil were identified and quantified via high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA marker gene for bacteria, and the ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS2) region for fungi. Overall, the results suggest that the soil bacteriome is more sensitive than the mycobiome to nitrogen fertilization. Specifically, ammonium sulfate application appears to negatively impact bacterial alpha-diversity, while also altering the relative abundance of Glomeromycota, prompting us to question the potential involvement of the sulfammox process in the loss of soil microbial diversity. Notably, the application of biogas residues did not alter the diversity or abundance of soil microbial communities, nor harbored any significant pathogens; therefore, advocating for their safety and encouraging further research to validate their safe nature and beneficial properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70050\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Different Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Diversity and Abundance of Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Grassland Soils: The Emerging Case of Ammonium Sulfate and Sulfammox Process
Improving agricultural productivity to meet the growing food and feed demand via nitrogen fertilization comes with trade-offs such as environmental pollution and biodiversity loss. Biogas residues (BRs) being a relatively new biofertilizer aiming at substituting chemical nitrogen fertilizers, have raised questions regarding their biosecurity and environmental footprint. In this study, we explored and compared the effect of repeated application of different nitrogen fertilizers on the bacterial and fungal α-diversity, relative abundance, β-diversity, and taxonomic composition in grassland soils over a period of two years. Given the paramount importance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable agriculture and climate change, we examined the relative abundance of Glomeromycota and their response to the different nitrogen fertilizers. Finally, the soil microbial community was scanned for the most prominent pathogens that are often detected in BRs and are the main concern related to their application on agricultural soils. Microbial communities in the soil were identified and quantified via high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA marker gene for bacteria, and the ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS2) region for fungi. Overall, the results suggest that the soil bacteriome is more sensitive than the mycobiome to nitrogen fertilization. Specifically, ammonium sulfate application appears to negatively impact bacterial alpha-diversity, while also altering the relative abundance of Glomeromycota, prompting us to question the potential involvement of the sulfammox process in the loss of soil microbial diversity. Notably, the application of biogas residues did not alter the diversity or abundance of soil microbial communities, nor harbored any significant pathogens; therefore, advocating for their safety and encouraging further research to validate their safe nature and beneficial properties.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.