在视觉不确定性下,重复阻碍了灵活的对象操作

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Catherine Anne Sager, Ian Greenhouse, Michelle Marneweck
{"title":"在视觉不确定性下,重复阻碍了灵活的对象操作","authors":"Catherine Anne Sager,&nbsp;Ian Greenhouse,&nbsp;Michelle Marneweck","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seemingly simple actions, like reaching for and lifting an object, involve the coordination of distinct neural pathways within the dorsal and ventral streams. These components can be differentially affected by repetition-induced anterograde interference, where extensive practice on one task impairs performance on subsequent tasks. Repetition leads to rigid movement patterns, making it harder to adapt flexibly to new situations, especially in tasks with sensory uncertainty that require the brain to rely more on past experiences (i.e., sensorimotor memories). To explore this, we tested whether object-use tasks, which depend on the ventral stream, are more affected by this interference than a simpler reach-to-button task with helpful visual cues. Participants completed two tasks: a reach-to-button task involving pressing buttons on either side of a symmetrical object and an object-use task where the same object had a hidden, asymmetric center of mass (CoM). To measure interference, we manipulated how many times participants lifted the object with the weight on one side before switching it to the other side. Our results showed that interference was strongest in the object-use task, where uncertain visual information forced participants to rely on sensorimotor memories. In contrast, the reach-to-button task, supported by helpful visual cues, showed no significant interference. This suggests that tasks relying on the ventral stream are more vulnerable to interference, particularly when sensory feedback is unclear. Our findings highlight how repetition affects different movement types and emphasize the need for a balance between repetition and flexibility in motor learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"61 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetition Hampers Flexible Object Manipulation Under Visual Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Anne Sager,&nbsp;Ian Greenhouse,&nbsp;Michelle Marneweck\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.70155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Seemingly simple actions, like reaching for and lifting an object, involve the coordination of distinct neural pathways within the dorsal and ventral streams. These components can be differentially affected by repetition-induced anterograde interference, where extensive practice on one task impairs performance on subsequent tasks. Repetition leads to rigid movement patterns, making it harder to adapt flexibly to new situations, especially in tasks with sensory uncertainty that require the brain to rely more on past experiences (i.e., sensorimotor memories). To explore this, we tested whether object-use tasks, which depend on the ventral stream, are more affected by this interference than a simpler reach-to-button task with helpful visual cues. Participants completed two tasks: a reach-to-button task involving pressing buttons on either side of a symmetrical object and an object-use task where the same object had a hidden, asymmetric center of mass (CoM). To measure interference, we manipulated how many times participants lifted the object with the weight on one side before switching it to the other side. Our results showed that interference was strongest in the object-use task, where uncertain visual information forced participants to rely on sensorimotor memories. In contrast, the reach-to-button task, supported by helpful visual cues, showed no significant interference. This suggests that tasks relying on the ventral stream are more vulnerable to interference, particularly when sensory feedback is unclear. Our findings highlight how repetition affects different movement types and emphasize the need for a balance between repetition and flexibility in motor learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"61 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70155\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70155\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

看似简单的动作,比如伸手拿起一个物体,涉及到背侧和腹侧神经流中不同神经通路的协调。重复诱发的顺行干扰会对这些成分产生不同的影响,在重复诱发的顺行干扰中,在一项任务上的大量练习会损害后续任务的表现。重复导致僵化的运动模式,使其更难灵活地适应新情况,特别是在具有感官不确定性的任务中,这需要大脑更多地依赖于过去的经验(即感觉运动记忆)。为了探索这一点,我们测试了依赖于腹侧流的物体使用任务是否比有帮助的视觉提示的简单的触摸按钮任务更容易受到这种干扰的影响。参与者完成了两项任务:一项是按下对称物体两侧的按钮,另一项是使用物体,同一物体有一个隐藏的不对称质心(CoM)。为了测量干扰,我们控制了参与者在将重物移到另一侧之前将重物移到另一侧的次数。我们的研究结果表明,干扰在物体使用任务中是最强的,在这个任务中,不确定的视觉信息迫使参与者依赖于感觉运动记忆。相比之下,在视觉提示的帮助下,触摸按钮的任务没有明显的干扰。这表明依赖于腹侧流的任务更容易受到干扰,特别是当感觉反馈不明确时。我们的研究结果强调了重复如何影响不同的运动类型,并强调了运动学习中重复和灵活性之间的平衡的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Repetition Hampers Flexible Object Manipulation Under Visual Uncertainty

Repetition Hampers Flexible Object Manipulation Under Visual Uncertainty

Seemingly simple actions, like reaching for and lifting an object, involve the coordination of distinct neural pathways within the dorsal and ventral streams. These components can be differentially affected by repetition-induced anterograde interference, where extensive practice on one task impairs performance on subsequent tasks. Repetition leads to rigid movement patterns, making it harder to adapt flexibly to new situations, especially in tasks with sensory uncertainty that require the brain to rely more on past experiences (i.e., sensorimotor memories). To explore this, we tested whether object-use tasks, which depend on the ventral stream, are more affected by this interference than a simpler reach-to-button task with helpful visual cues. Participants completed two tasks: a reach-to-button task involving pressing buttons on either side of a symmetrical object and an object-use task where the same object had a hidden, asymmetric center of mass (CoM). To measure interference, we manipulated how many times participants lifted the object with the weight on one side before switching it to the other side. Our results showed that interference was strongest in the object-use task, where uncertain visual information forced participants to rely on sensorimotor memories. In contrast, the reach-to-button task, supported by helpful visual cues, showed no significant interference. This suggests that tasks relying on the ventral stream are more vulnerable to interference, particularly when sensory feedback is unclear. Our findings highlight how repetition affects different movement types and emphasize the need for a balance between repetition and flexibility in motor learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信