人口处理能力:加拿大和瑞典将强迫移民作为案例的制度的起源和发展

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Andreas Asplen Lundstedt
{"title":"人口处理能力:加拿大和瑞典将强迫移民作为案例的制度的起源和发展","authors":"Andreas Asplen Lundstedt","doi":"10.1111/gove.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>States have invested heavily in controlling forced migration for decades, with mixed results. Research often focuses on deterrence, leading to a neglect of bureaucratic boundaries within borders. This article unpacks the unrecognized importance of people-processing capacity: a state's ability to render forced migrants legible by categorizing them as cases and selecting those perceived as desirable victims. Due to the heterogeneous nature of claims and the agency of migrants, rendering migrants as cases is a deeply complicated process. Using a historical-institutionalist framework, the article explores the role and historical development of people-processing capacity through a comparison of the evolution of modern migration control in Canada and Sweden, two states with similar trajectories of capacity-building but different guiding ideas for migration policy. The results trace the institutional roots of deservingness, reveal different ideals of vulnerable and adaptable refugees, and theorize how persistent governance problems emerge from classification systems intended to order migration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48056,"journal":{"name":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gove.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"People-Processing Capacity: The Origins and Development of Institutions to Render Forced Migrants as Cases in Canada and Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Asplen Lundstedt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gove.70035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>States have invested heavily in controlling forced migration for decades, with mixed results. Research often focuses on deterrence, leading to a neglect of bureaucratic boundaries within borders. This article unpacks the unrecognized importance of people-processing capacity: a state's ability to render forced migrants legible by categorizing them as cases and selecting those perceived as desirable victims. Due to the heterogeneous nature of claims and the agency of migrants, rendering migrants as cases is a deeply complicated process. Using a historical-institutionalist framework, the article explores the role and historical development of people-processing capacity through a comparison of the evolution of modern migration control in Canada and Sweden, two states with similar trajectories of capacity-building but different guiding ideas for migration policy. The results trace the institutional roots of deservingness, reveal different ideals of vulnerable and adaptable refugees, and theorize how persistent governance problems emerge from classification systems intended to order migration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gove.70035\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.70035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,各国在控制强迫移民方面投入了大量资金,结果好坏参半。研究往往侧重于威慑,导致忽视了边界内的官僚边界。这篇文章揭示了人们未认识到的处理人口能力的重要性:一个国家有能力通过将强迫移民归类为案例并选择那些被认为是理想受害者的人来使他们清晰可辨。由于索赔和移民代理机构的异质性,将移民视为案件是一个非常复杂的过程。本文采用历史制度主义框架,通过比较加拿大和瑞典现代移民控制的演变,探讨了人口处理能力的作用和历史发展。加拿大和瑞典的能力建设轨迹相似,但移民政策的指导思想不同。研究结果追溯了应得性的制度根源,揭示了弱势和适应性难民的不同理想,并从理论上解释了旨在对移民进行排序的分类系统如何产生持续的治理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
People-Processing Capacity: The Origins and Development of Institutions to Render Forced Migrants as Cases in Canada and Sweden

States have invested heavily in controlling forced migration for decades, with mixed results. Research often focuses on deterrence, leading to a neglect of bureaucratic boundaries within borders. This article unpacks the unrecognized importance of people-processing capacity: a state's ability to render forced migrants legible by categorizing them as cases and selecting those perceived as desirable victims. Due to the heterogeneous nature of claims and the agency of migrants, rendering migrants as cases is a deeply complicated process. Using a historical-institutionalist framework, the article explores the role and historical development of people-processing capacity through a comparison of the evolution of modern migration control in Canada and Sweden, two states with similar trajectories of capacity-building but different guiding ideas for migration policy. The results trace the institutional roots of deservingness, reveal different ideals of vulnerable and adaptable refugees, and theorize how persistent governance problems emerge from classification systems intended to order migration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Governance provides a forum for the theoretical and practical discussion of executive politics, public policy, administration, and the organization of the state. Published in association with International Political Science Association''s Research Committee on the Structure & Organization of Government (SOG), it emphasizes peer-reviewed articles that take an international or comparative approach to public policy and administration. All papers, regardless of empirical focus, should have wider theoretical, comparative, or practical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信