植物对土地利用和气候变化有多脆弱?根据本地和红色名录状态比较区域尺度上当前和未来的分布

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Arthur Sanguet, Nicolas Wyler, Blaise Petitpierre, Pascal Martin, Michelle Price, Antoine Adde, Anthony Lehmann
{"title":"植物对土地利用和气候变化有多脆弱?根据本地和红色名录状态比较区域尺度上当前和未来的分布","authors":"Arthur Sanguet,&nbsp;Nicolas Wyler,&nbsp;Blaise Petitpierre,&nbsp;Pascal Martin,&nbsp;Michelle Price,&nbsp;Antoine Adde,&nbsp;Anthony Lehmann","doi":"10.1111/jbi.15132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Future species distributions were modelled to assess the distributional changes of 1692 plant species according to several scenarios. Species vulnerability was calculated according to their red list and native statuses using a new index to better understand the most vulnerable groups of species to future conditions and improve conservation actions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Greater Geneva region between France and Switzerland.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>From present to 2050.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1692 species of plants from all major groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two different species distribution models were created to combine the effect of climate change at the continental scale and land-use changes at the regional scale in 2050. Two scenarios of climate change were used (optimistic and pessimistic) and one business-as-usual land-use–land-cover scenario. Current and future distributions were compared using six spatial indicators combined to create a new vulnerability index to global changes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>More than one-third of all species assessed showed at least a moderate vulnerability, and more than 10% showed a high vulnerability to global changes, mostly composed of native species. Most exotic species showed moderate benefits to global changes, and one-third were associated with high benefits. Pessimistic scenarios of climate change exacerbated the trends identified under optimistic scenarios and were associated with higher vulnerability for native species and higher benefits for exotic ones. No clear pattern was found when comparing species vulnerability according to their red list status, questioning its ability to preserve species in the long term.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Native species are more vulnerable to global changes, while exotic species benefit from them. Climate is the main driver of future distributional changes in the study area. Current levels of threat fail to inform us of species vulnerability to future conditions, questioning their relevance and supporting the assessments of similar studies to identify the most vulnerable species.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15299,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biogeography","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Vulnerable Are Plants to Land-Use and Climate Changes? Comparing Current and Future Distributions at the Regional Scale According to Native and Red List Statuses\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Sanguet,&nbsp;Nicolas Wyler,&nbsp;Blaise Petitpierre,&nbsp;Pascal Martin,&nbsp;Michelle Price,&nbsp;Antoine Adde,&nbsp;Anthony Lehmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbi.15132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Future species distributions were modelled to assess the distributional changes of 1692 plant species according to several scenarios. Species vulnerability was calculated according to their red list and native statuses using a new index to better understand the most vulnerable groups of species to future conditions and improve conservation actions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Greater Geneva region between France and Switzerland.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>From present to 2050.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 1692 species of plants from all major groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two different species distribution models were created to combine the effect of climate change at the continental scale and land-use changes at the regional scale in 2050. Two scenarios of climate change were used (optimistic and pessimistic) and one business-as-usual land-use–land-cover scenario. Current and future distributions were compared using six spatial indicators combined to create a new vulnerability index to global changes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>More than one-third of all species assessed showed at least a moderate vulnerability, and more than 10% showed a high vulnerability to global changes, mostly composed of native species. Most exotic species showed moderate benefits to global changes, and one-third were associated with high benefits. Pessimistic scenarios of climate change exacerbated the trends identified under optimistic scenarios and were associated with higher vulnerability for native species and higher benefits for exotic ones. No clear pattern was found when comparing species vulnerability according to their red list status, questioning its ability to preserve species in the long term.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Native species are more vulnerable to global changes, while exotic species benefit from them. Climate is the main driver of future distributional changes in the study area. Current levels of threat fail to inform us of species vulnerability to future conditions, questioning their relevance and supporting the assessments of similar studies to identify the most vulnerable species.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"52 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15132\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.15132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的建立未来物种分布模型,评估1692种植物在不同情景下的分布变化。根据物种的红色名录和本地状态,使用新的指数来计算物种的脆弱性,以更好地了解物种对未来条件的最脆弱群体,并改进保护行动。地理位置位于法国和瑞士之间的大日内瓦地区。时间:从现在到2050年。主要分类群研究了各主要类群的1692种植物。方法建立两种不同的物种分布模型,结合2050年大陆尺度气候变化和区域尺度土地利用变化的影响。使用了两种气候变化情景(乐观和悲观)和一种一切照旧的土地利用-土地覆盖情景。利用6个空间指标对当前和未来的分布进行了比较,从而创建了一个新的全球变化脆弱性指数。结果三分之一以上的物种对全球变化表现出中度以上的脆弱性,10%以上的物种对全球变化表现出高度脆弱性,主要以本土物种为主。大多数外来物种对全球变化的受益程度中等,三分之一的外来物种对全球变化的受益程度较高。气候变化的悲观情景加剧了乐观情景下确定的趋势,并与本地物种的脆弱性增加和外来物种的收益增加相关。在比较红色名录中物种的脆弱性时,没有发现明显的模式,质疑其长期保护物种的能力。主要结论全球变化对本地物种的影响更大,而对外来物种的影响更大。气候是研究区未来分布变化的主要驱动力。目前的威胁水平没有告诉我们物种对未来条件的脆弱性,质疑它们的相关性,并支持类似研究的评估,以确定最脆弱的物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Vulnerable Are Plants to Land-Use and Climate Changes? Comparing Current and Future Distributions at the Regional Scale According to Native and Red List Statuses

Aim

Future species distributions were modelled to assess the distributional changes of 1692 plant species according to several scenarios. Species vulnerability was calculated according to their red list and native statuses using a new index to better understand the most vulnerable groups of species to future conditions and improve conservation actions.

Location

Greater Geneva region between France and Switzerland.

Time Period

From present to 2050.

Major Taxa Studied

A total of 1692 species of plants from all major groups.

Methods

Two different species distribution models were created to combine the effect of climate change at the continental scale and land-use changes at the regional scale in 2050. Two scenarios of climate change were used (optimistic and pessimistic) and one business-as-usual land-use–land-cover scenario. Current and future distributions were compared using six spatial indicators combined to create a new vulnerability index to global changes.

Results

More than one-third of all species assessed showed at least a moderate vulnerability, and more than 10% showed a high vulnerability to global changes, mostly composed of native species. Most exotic species showed moderate benefits to global changes, and one-third were associated with high benefits. Pessimistic scenarios of climate change exacerbated the trends identified under optimistic scenarios and were associated with higher vulnerability for native species and higher benefits for exotic ones. No clear pattern was found when comparing species vulnerability according to their red list status, questioning its ability to preserve species in the long term.

Main Conclusions

Native species are more vulnerable to global changes, while exotic species benefit from them. Climate is the main driver of future distributional changes in the study area. Current levels of threat fail to inform us of species vulnerability to future conditions, questioning their relevance and supporting the assessments of similar studies to identify the most vulnerable species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biogeography
Journal of Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Papers dealing with all aspects of spatial, ecological and historical biogeography are considered for publication in Journal of Biogeography. The mission of the journal is to contribute to the growth and societal relevance of the discipline of biogeography through its role in the dissemination of biogeographical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信