{"title":"儿童气管切开术远程家庭监测项目(PTRHMP)与气管切开术儿童延长住院时间的经济研究","authors":"Adele K. Evans","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background/Context</h3>\n \n <p>Home health nursing is considered critical to transition to at-home care after pediatric tracheostomy. This diminishing resource contributes a barrier to at-home care. Telemedicine (Bluetooth wireless technology for monitoring vital signs, Wi-Fi data transfer to a centralized monitoring center for alarm response) could add support for families during this transition. This manuscript compares a retrospective evaluation of observed hospital costs to modeled estimates for a Pediatric Tracheostomy Remote Home Monitoring Program (PTRHMP): equipment alarm monitoring, call-to-home confirmation, and a centralized database of critical information for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) dispatch.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key Methods</h3>\n \n <p>(1) Cost of Care Cohort analysis of in-patient cost of care for pediatric tracheostomy patients using retrospective chart review. (2) Modeled cost estimates using a financial proforma developed by experts in the field. (3) Comparative Analysis of Cost of Care Cohort versus PTRHMP proforma. (4) Potentially avoidable Adverse Event analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-three candidates met inclusion criteria for the Cost of Care Cohort Analysis. Average LOS was 31.6 days longer than target LOS, was influenced by average number of caregivers (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and by age at tracheostomy placement (<i>p</i> = 0.038; 1), and averaged ($17,000/day billed, $3000/day payments received) 10 times the cost estimated for the PTRHMP proforma ($285 per patient-day).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The widespread adoption of a Pediatric Tracheostomy Remote Home Monitoring Program (PTRHMP) appears to be technologically and financially tenable at one tenth the cost of in-patient care. Patients under the age of 2 at tracheostomy placement may represent a separate subgroup for analysis. An implementation study is required to determine the level of safety compared to currently available conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>2—Cohort Study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Study of a Pediatric Tracheostomy Remote Home Monitoring Program (PTRHMP) Compared to Prolonged Hospitalization for Children With Tracheostomy\",\"authors\":\"Adele K. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background/Context</h3>\\n \\n <p>Home health nursing is considered critical to transition to at-home care after pediatric tracheostomy. This diminishing resource contributes a barrier to at-home care. Telemedicine (Bluetooth wireless technology for monitoring vital signs, Wi-Fi data transfer to a centralized monitoring center for alarm response) could add support for families during this transition. This manuscript compares a retrospective evaluation of observed hospital costs to modeled estimates for a Pediatric Tracheostomy Remote Home Monitoring Program (PTRHMP): equipment alarm monitoring, call-to-home confirmation, and a centralized database of critical information for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) dispatch.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Key Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>(1) Cost of Care Cohort analysis of in-patient cost of care for pediatric tracheostomy patients using retrospective chart review. (2) Modeled cost estimates using a financial proforma developed by experts in the field. (3) Comparative Analysis of Cost of Care Cohort versus PTRHMP proforma. (4) Potentially avoidable Adverse Event analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-three candidates met inclusion criteria for the Cost of Care Cohort Analysis. Average LOS was 31.6 days longer than target LOS, was influenced by average number of caregivers (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and by age at tracheostomy placement (<i>p</i> = 0.038; 1), and averaged ($17,000/day billed, $3000/day payments received) 10 times the cost estimated for the PTRHMP proforma ($285 per patient-day).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The widespread adoption of a Pediatric Tracheostomy Remote Home Monitoring Program (PTRHMP) appears to be technologically and financially tenable at one tenth the cost of in-patient care. Patients under the age of 2 at tracheostomy placement may represent a separate subgroup for analysis. An implementation study is required to determine the level of safety compared to currently available conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>2—Cohort Study.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70167\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic Study of a Pediatric Tracheostomy Remote Home Monitoring Program (PTRHMP) Compared to Prolonged Hospitalization for Children With Tracheostomy
Background/Context
Home health nursing is considered critical to transition to at-home care after pediatric tracheostomy. This diminishing resource contributes a barrier to at-home care. Telemedicine (Bluetooth wireless technology for monitoring vital signs, Wi-Fi data transfer to a centralized monitoring center for alarm response) could add support for families during this transition. This manuscript compares a retrospective evaluation of observed hospital costs to modeled estimates for a Pediatric Tracheostomy Remote Home Monitoring Program (PTRHMP): equipment alarm monitoring, call-to-home confirmation, and a centralized database of critical information for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) dispatch.
Key Methods
(1) Cost of Care Cohort analysis of in-patient cost of care for pediatric tracheostomy patients using retrospective chart review. (2) Modeled cost estimates using a financial proforma developed by experts in the field. (3) Comparative Analysis of Cost of Care Cohort versus PTRHMP proforma. (4) Potentially avoidable Adverse Event analysis.
Results
Thirty-three candidates met inclusion criteria for the Cost of Care Cohort Analysis. Average LOS was 31.6 days longer than target LOS, was influenced by average number of caregivers (p < 0.0001) and by age at tracheostomy placement (p = 0.038; 1), and averaged ($17,000/day billed, $3000/day payments received) 10 times the cost estimated for the PTRHMP proforma ($285 per patient-day).
Conclusion
The widespread adoption of a Pediatric Tracheostomy Remote Home Monitoring Program (PTRHMP) appears to be technologically and financially tenable at one tenth the cost of in-patient care. Patients under the age of 2 at tracheostomy placement may represent a separate subgroup for analysis. An implementation study is required to determine the level of safety compared to currently available conditions.