“我们感知到同样的现实吗?”关于COVID-19疫苗的红球叙事中的真相和说服技巧

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
K. Grailey , R. Gerrard , M. Kihanga , A. Buttenheim
{"title":"“我们感知到同样的现实吗?”关于COVID-19疫苗的红球叙事中的真相和说服技巧","authors":"K. Grailey ,&nbsp;R. Gerrard ,&nbsp;M. Kihanga ,&nbsp;A. Buttenheim","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite widespread public health campaigns, lower than desired COVID-19 vaccine uptake was seen across the USA. Vaccine hesitancy can be driven by the proliferation of misinformation online, shaping beliefs and vaccine acceptance. This study explored motivated reasoning and its role in the development of such beliefs, specifically using narratives about “red pilling” – a popular concept originating from the 1999 film ‘”The Matrix”.</div><div>Comments responding to an online blog post by Steve Kirsch, requesting red pilling stories from his followers were analysed in a stepwise process, creating a codebook based on existing typologies for logical fallacies and persuasion techniques. Coded content were thematically analysed using a framework approach.</div><div>The 1472 comments posted by June 22nd<sup>,</sup> 2022 were analysed. Fifty-three initial codes were created, condensed into a thematic framework with three overarching domains – “How did you get red pilled”, “Have you been able to red pill others” and “Living red pilled”. These domains contained 11 themes and 14 additional sub-themes. Commenters shared insights into becoming red-pilled, the significance of persuasive sources and how they went on to “red-pill” others. Data also illustrated an isolated life once “red-pilled”, whilst simultaneously being a member of a global network.</div><div>Our analysis provides a rich insight into the strategies and scenarios that inspire red-pilling narratives and their consequences, particularly for public health initiatives such as vaccination programmes. Understanding the ideology that underpins the initiation and spread of misinformation can be utilised to pre-empt and minimise it, building trust across a broad range of world views.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100588"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Do we perceive the same reality?” Truth telling and persuasion techniques in Red Pilling narratives about the COVID-19 vaccine\",\"authors\":\"K. Grailey ,&nbsp;R. Gerrard ,&nbsp;M. Kihanga ,&nbsp;A. Buttenheim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite widespread public health campaigns, lower than desired COVID-19 vaccine uptake was seen across the USA. Vaccine hesitancy can be driven by the proliferation of misinformation online, shaping beliefs and vaccine acceptance. This study explored motivated reasoning and its role in the development of such beliefs, specifically using narratives about “red pilling” – a popular concept originating from the 1999 film ‘”The Matrix”.</div><div>Comments responding to an online blog post by Steve Kirsch, requesting red pilling stories from his followers were analysed in a stepwise process, creating a codebook based on existing typologies for logical fallacies and persuasion techniques. Coded content were thematically analysed using a framework approach.</div><div>The 1472 comments posted by June 22nd<sup>,</sup> 2022 were analysed. Fifty-three initial codes were created, condensed into a thematic framework with three overarching domains – “How did you get red pilled”, “Have you been able to red pill others” and “Living red pilled”. These domains contained 11 themes and 14 additional sub-themes. Commenters shared insights into becoming red-pilled, the significance of persuasive sources and how they went on to “red-pill” others. Data also illustrated an isolated life once “red-pilled”, whilst simultaneously being a member of a global network.</div><div>Our analysis provides a rich insight into the strategies and scenarios that inspire red-pilling narratives and their consequences, particularly for public health initiatives such as vaccination programmes. Understanding the ideology that underpins the initiation and spread of misinformation can be utilised to pre-empt and minimise it, building trust across a broad range of world views.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管开展了广泛的公共卫生运动,但美国各地的COVID-19疫苗接种率低于预期。网上错误信息的扩散、对信念的塑造和对疫苗的接受,可能会导致对疫苗的犹豫。这项研究探索了动机推理及其在这种信念发展中的作用,特别是使用了关于“红球”的叙述——一个起源于1999年电影《黑客帝国》的流行概念。史蒂夫·基尔希(Steve Kirsch)在网上博客上发表了一篇文章,要求他的粉丝们讲述红球故事。研究人员通过一个逐步分析的过程,根据现有的逻辑谬误和说服技巧类型学,创建了一本密码本。使用框架方法对编码内容进行主题分析。我们分析了截至2022年6月22日发布的1472条评论。他们创建了53个初始代码,将其浓缩成一个主题框架,其中包含三个主要领域——“你是如何被红色药丸药丸”、“你是否能够给别人红色药丸药丸”和“活的红色药丸”。这些领域包含11个主题和14个附加的子主题。评论者们分享了如何成为红药丸,有说服力的消息来源的重要性,以及他们如何继续“红药丸”别人的见解。数据还显示了一种曾经“红丸”的孤立生活,同时也是全球网络的一员。我们的分析为激发红球叙事及其后果的策略和情景提供了丰富的见解,特别是对疫苗接种计划等公共卫生倡议。了解支持错误信息发起和传播的意识形态,可以用来先发制人并将其最小化,在广泛的世界观中建立信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Do we perceive the same reality?” Truth telling and persuasion techniques in Red Pilling narratives about the COVID-19 vaccine
Despite widespread public health campaigns, lower than desired COVID-19 vaccine uptake was seen across the USA. Vaccine hesitancy can be driven by the proliferation of misinformation online, shaping beliefs and vaccine acceptance. This study explored motivated reasoning and its role in the development of such beliefs, specifically using narratives about “red pilling” – a popular concept originating from the 1999 film ‘”The Matrix”.
Comments responding to an online blog post by Steve Kirsch, requesting red pilling stories from his followers were analysed in a stepwise process, creating a codebook based on existing typologies for logical fallacies and persuasion techniques. Coded content were thematically analysed using a framework approach.
The 1472 comments posted by June 22nd, 2022 were analysed. Fifty-three initial codes were created, condensed into a thematic framework with three overarching domains – “How did you get red pilled”, “Have you been able to red pill others” and “Living red pilled”. These domains contained 11 themes and 14 additional sub-themes. Commenters shared insights into becoming red-pilled, the significance of persuasive sources and how they went on to “red-pill” others. Data also illustrated an isolated life once “red-pilled”, whilst simultaneously being a member of a global network.
Our analysis provides a rich insight into the strategies and scenarios that inspire red-pilling narratives and their consequences, particularly for public health initiatives such as vaccination programmes. Understanding the ideology that underpins the initiation and spread of misinformation can be utilised to pre-empt and minimise it, building trust across a broad range of world views.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信