绿色氢供应链中基于区块链的风险缓解:区间2型模糊MCDM方法

IF 6.8 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Behzad Masoomi , Seyed Pendar Toufighi , Hosein Arman , Seyedeh Elham Kamali , Jan Vang
{"title":"绿色氢供应链中基于区块链的风险缓解:区间2型模糊MCDM方法","authors":"Behzad Masoomi ,&nbsp;Seyed Pendar Toufighi ,&nbsp;Hosein Arman ,&nbsp;Seyedeh Elham Kamali ,&nbsp;Jan Vang","doi":"10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study introduces a novel fuzzy hybrid framework that integrates Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IT2 F-SWARA), and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (IT2 F-EDAS) methods to evaluate and rank risk factors and blockchain technology facilitators in the Green Hydrogen Supply Chain (GHSC). As sustainability becomes increasingly critical in the energy sector, green hydrogen (GH) emerges as a promising solution for decarbonizing industries. However, the GHSC faces significant risks, including high investment costs, operational complexities, and inadequate technological infrastructure. Blockchain technology, known for its transparency, security, and decentralization, is proposed as a potential enabler to mitigate these risks. The research begins with a comprehensive Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify key GHSC risks and blockchain facilitators, followed by expert panel validation to finalize 23 risks and 11 facilitators. The IT2 F-SWARA method calculates the weights of risks, while IT2 F-EDAS ranks the facilitators in relation to risk mitigation. The results indicate that economic and technological and infrastructure factors are the most critical, while blockchain facilitators such as transparent transactions and smart contracts are most effective in addressing GHSC risks. This research provides a unique decision-making framework to help practitioners in the energy sector prioritize blockchain strategies for risk management, enhancing resilience and sustainability in GHSC operations. The methodology’s robustness is verified through consistency tests and sensitivity analysis. By addressing gaps in the existing literature on the integration of blockchain technology in the GHSC, the study offers valuable insights for both academia and industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100253,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100238"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blockchain-enabled risk mitigation in green hydrogen supply chains: an interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM approach\",\"authors\":\"Behzad Masoomi ,&nbsp;Seyed Pendar Toufighi ,&nbsp;Hosein Arman ,&nbsp;Seyedeh Elham Kamali ,&nbsp;Jan Vang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study introduces a novel fuzzy hybrid framework that integrates Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IT2 F-SWARA), and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (IT2 F-EDAS) methods to evaluate and rank risk factors and blockchain technology facilitators in the Green Hydrogen Supply Chain (GHSC). As sustainability becomes increasingly critical in the energy sector, green hydrogen (GH) emerges as a promising solution for decarbonizing industries. However, the GHSC faces significant risks, including high investment costs, operational complexities, and inadequate technological infrastructure. Blockchain technology, known for its transparency, security, and decentralization, is proposed as a potential enabler to mitigate these risks. The research begins with a comprehensive Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify key GHSC risks and blockchain facilitators, followed by expert panel validation to finalize 23 risks and 11 facilitators. The IT2 F-SWARA method calculates the weights of risks, while IT2 F-EDAS ranks the facilitators in relation to risk mitigation. The results indicate that economic and technological and infrastructure factors are the most critical, while blockchain facilitators such as transparent transactions and smart contracts are most effective in addressing GHSC risks. This research provides a unique decision-making framework to help practitioners in the energy sector prioritize blockchain strategies for risk management, enhancing resilience and sustainability in GHSC operations. The methodology’s robustness is verified through consistency tests and sensitivity analysis. By addressing gaps in the existing literature on the integration of blockchain technology in the GHSC, the study offers valuable insights for both academia and industry.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277239092500037X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277239092500037X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种新的模糊混合框架,将区间2型模糊逐步权重评价比分析法(IT2 F-SWARA)和基于平均解距离的区间2型模糊评价法(IT2 F-EDAS)相结合,对绿色氢供应链(GHSC)中的风险因素和区块链技术促进因素进行评价和排序。随着可持续性在能源领域变得越来越重要,绿色氢(GH)成为脱碳行业的一个有前途的解决方案。然而,GHSC面临着巨大的风险,包括高投资成本、操作复杂性和技术基础设施不足。区块链技术以其透明性、安全性和去中心化而闻名,被提议作为减轻这些风险的潜在推动者。该研究首先进行了全面的系统文献综述(SLR),以确定关键的GHSC风险和bb10促进因素,然后进行专家小组验证,最终确定23个风险和11个促进因素。IT2 F-SWARA方法计算风险权重,而IT2 F-EDAS方法根据风险缓解对促进因素进行排名。结果表明,经济、技术和基础设施因素是最关键的,而透明交易和智能合约等区块链促进因素在应对GHSC风险方面最有效。本研究提供了一个独特的决策框架,以帮助能源部门的从业者优先考虑区块链风险管理战略,增强GHSC运营的弹性和可持续性。通过一致性检验和敏感性分析验证了该方法的稳健性。通过解决现有文献中关于区块链技术在GHSC中的整合的空白,该研究为学术界和工业界提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Blockchain-enabled risk mitigation in green hydrogen supply chains: an interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM approach

Blockchain-enabled risk mitigation in green hydrogen supply chains: an interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM approach
This study introduces a novel fuzzy hybrid framework that integrates Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (IT2 F-SWARA), and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (IT2 F-EDAS) methods to evaluate and rank risk factors and blockchain technology facilitators in the Green Hydrogen Supply Chain (GHSC). As sustainability becomes increasingly critical in the energy sector, green hydrogen (GH) emerges as a promising solution for decarbonizing industries. However, the GHSC faces significant risks, including high investment costs, operational complexities, and inadequate technological infrastructure. Blockchain technology, known for its transparency, security, and decentralization, is proposed as a potential enabler to mitigate these risks. The research begins with a comprehensive Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify key GHSC risks and blockchain facilitators, followed by expert panel validation to finalize 23 risks and 11 facilitators. The IT2 F-SWARA method calculates the weights of risks, while IT2 F-EDAS ranks the facilitators in relation to risk mitigation. The results indicate that economic and technological and infrastructure factors are the most critical, while blockchain facilitators such as transparent transactions and smart contracts are most effective in addressing GHSC risks. This research provides a unique decision-making framework to help practitioners in the energy sector prioritize blockchain strategies for risk management, enhancing resilience and sustainability in GHSC operations. The methodology’s robustness is verified through consistency tests and sensitivity analysis. By addressing gaps in the existing literature on the integration of blockchain technology in the GHSC, the study offers valuable insights for both academia and industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信