沙特阿拉伯CO2封存被动地震监测网优化

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Zuzana Jechumtálová , Leo Eisner , Frans van Buchem , Thomas Finkbeiner
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯CO2封存被动地震监测网优化","authors":"Zuzana Jechumtálová ,&nbsp;Leo Eisner ,&nbsp;Frans van Buchem ,&nbsp;Thomas Finkbeiner","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assesses the effectiveness of various seismic monitoring arrays, including surface-based, shallow borehole, and Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) arrays, for detecting microseismic events at a potential sequestration site in Saudi Arabia. The analysis focuses on two key parameters: the sensitivity of the arrays in detecting seismic events and the accuracy in locating detected events. Sensitivity is quantified by determining the minimum detectable moment magnitude at three depth intervals of interest: the seal, reservoir, and underburden layers. Results indicate that surface-based and shallow borehole arrays are more effective at detecting weak (around moment magnitude 0.5 and weaker) seismic events at shallow layers, whereas DAS arrays exhibit significantly reduced sensitivity at greater distances from the monitoring borehole due to increased attenuation. The study also examines location uncertainty caused by variations in seismic wave arrival times and the impact of different array configurations. While DAS arrays can detect seismic events, their ability to accurately locate events is limited by their sensitivity to horizontally propagating waves, particularly at greater distances from the monitoring borehole. For effective microseismic monitoring, the study concludes that DAS arrays should be spaced between 2 km and 4 km, while surface and shallow borehole arrays are preferable for monitoring the top seal formation. Furthermore, surface and near surface arrays are able to differentiate between seismicity from the seal, reservoir, and underburden subject to accurate velocity model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104416"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of passive seismic monitoring network for CO2 sequestration in Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Zuzana Jechumtálová ,&nbsp;Leo Eisner ,&nbsp;Frans van Buchem ,&nbsp;Thomas Finkbeiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study assesses the effectiveness of various seismic monitoring arrays, including surface-based, shallow borehole, and Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) arrays, for detecting microseismic events at a potential sequestration site in Saudi Arabia. The analysis focuses on two key parameters: the sensitivity of the arrays in detecting seismic events and the accuracy in locating detected events. Sensitivity is quantified by determining the minimum detectable moment magnitude at three depth intervals of interest: the seal, reservoir, and underburden layers. Results indicate that surface-based and shallow borehole arrays are more effective at detecting weak (around moment magnitude 0.5 and weaker) seismic events at shallow layers, whereas DAS arrays exhibit significantly reduced sensitivity at greater distances from the monitoring borehole due to increased attenuation. The study also examines location uncertainty caused by variations in seismic wave arrival times and the impact of different array configurations. While DAS arrays can detect seismic events, their ability to accurately locate events is limited by their sensitivity to horizontally propagating waves, particularly at greater distances from the monitoring borehole. For effective microseismic monitoring, the study concludes that DAS arrays should be spaced between 2 km and 4 km, while surface and shallow borehole arrays are preferable for monitoring the top seal formation. Furthermore, surface and near surface arrays are able to differentiate between seismicity from the seal, reservoir, and underburden subject to accurate velocity model.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625001148\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583625001148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了各种地震监测阵列的有效性,包括地面、浅井眼和分布式声学传感(DAS)阵列,用于检测沙特阿拉伯潜在封存地点的微地震事件。重点分析了两个关键参数:探测地震事件的灵敏度和定位地震事件的精度。灵敏度是通过确定三个感兴趣的深度区间的最小可探测矩量级来量化的:密封层、储层和下覆层。结果表明,地面和浅层井眼阵列在探测浅层弱地震(矩震级约为0.5或更弱)时更有效,而DAS阵列在距离监测井眼较远的地方,由于衰减增加,灵敏度显著降低。该研究还考察了地震波到达时间的变化和不同阵列配置的影响所造成的位置不确定性。虽然DAS阵列可以检测地震事件,但其准确定位地震事件的能力受到水平传播波的敏感性的限制,特别是在距离监测井较远的地方。为了进行有效的微地震监测,研究得出结论,DAS阵列的间距应在2公里至4公里之间,而地面和浅井阵列更适合监测顶部密封地层。此外,根据精确的速度模型,地表和近地表阵列能够区分来自密封、储层和下覆层的地震活动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of passive seismic monitoring network for CO2 sequestration in Saudi Arabia
This study assesses the effectiveness of various seismic monitoring arrays, including surface-based, shallow borehole, and Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) arrays, for detecting microseismic events at a potential sequestration site in Saudi Arabia. The analysis focuses on two key parameters: the sensitivity of the arrays in detecting seismic events and the accuracy in locating detected events. Sensitivity is quantified by determining the minimum detectable moment magnitude at three depth intervals of interest: the seal, reservoir, and underburden layers. Results indicate that surface-based and shallow borehole arrays are more effective at detecting weak (around moment magnitude 0.5 and weaker) seismic events at shallow layers, whereas DAS arrays exhibit significantly reduced sensitivity at greater distances from the monitoring borehole due to increased attenuation. The study also examines location uncertainty caused by variations in seismic wave arrival times and the impact of different array configurations. While DAS arrays can detect seismic events, their ability to accurately locate events is limited by their sensitivity to horizontally propagating waves, particularly at greater distances from the monitoring borehole. For effective microseismic monitoring, the study concludes that DAS arrays should be spaced between 2 km and 4 km, while surface and shallow borehole arrays are preferable for monitoring the top seal formation. Furthermore, surface and near surface arrays are able to differentiate between seismicity from the seal, reservoir, and underburden subject to accurate velocity model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信