来自国际儿童支气管扩张登记(Child-BEAR-Net registry)的第一项结果描述了儿童支气管扩张及其管理的多国差异:一项多中心横断面研究

IF 32.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Laura Garriga-Grimau, Ahmad Kantar, Keith Grimwood, Charl Verwey, Refiloe Masekela, Diane Gray, Ameena Goga, Bulent Karadag, Ela Erdem Eralp, Yasemin Gokdemir, Konstantinos Douros, Dafni Moriki, Elpiniki Kartsiouni, Antonio Moreno-Galdó, Laura Petrarca, Fabio Midulla, Maria Elisa Di Cicco, Oleksandr Mazulov, Sonila Boriçi, Jeanette Boyd, Efthymia Alexopoulou
{"title":"来自国际儿童支气管扩张登记(Child-BEAR-Net registry)的第一项结果描述了儿童支气管扩张及其管理的多国差异:一项多中心横断面研究","authors":"Laura Garriga-Grimau, Ahmad Kantar, Keith Grimwood, Charl Verwey, Refiloe Masekela, Diane Gray, Ameena Goga, Bulent Karadag, Ela Erdem Eralp, Yasemin Gokdemir, Konstantinos Douros, Dafni Moriki, Elpiniki Kartsiouni, Antonio Moreno-Galdó, Laura Petrarca, Fabio Midulla, Maria Elisa Di Cicco, Oleksandr Mazulov, Sonila Boriçi, Jeanette Boyd, Efthymia Alexopoulou","doi":"10.1016/s2213-2600(25)00089-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Despite increasing recognition of bronchiectasis worldwide, there are no multicountry data characterising bronchiectasis in children. We aimed to describe clinical features, comparing inter-country and regional variations, and describe indices of overall quality-of-care standards assessed against international consensus statements for children and young people with bronchiectasis.<h3>Methods</h3>Child-BEAR-Net is an international collaborative paediatric bronchiectasis network across several continents. Using our International Paediatric Bronchiectasis Registry data from secondary and tertiary hospitals across eight countries, we conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study of all patients in the registry younger than 18 years diagnosed with bronchiectasis. Data were grouped into four geographical regions: Australia, South Africa, Greece–Italy–Spain, and Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine. Patients with cystic fibrosis or a history of heart or lung transplantation were excluded. We assessed baseline clinical characteristics, causes, treatments, and quality-of-care indicators, and compared findings across regions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for between-group comparisons.<h3>Findings</h3>Between June 1, 2020, and Feb 9, 2024, 408 patients were enrolled (median age at diagnosis 6·0 years [IQR 3·2–9·0]; 229 (56%) male and 179 (44%) female patients). The most common underlying causes were post-infection (127 [31%]), primary and secondary immunodeficiencies (79 [19%]), and known genetic disorders (55 [13%]). Common comorbidities included asthma (70 [17%]), otorhinolaryngeal disorders (58 [14%]), and congenital major airway malformation (51 [13%]). In the previous 12 months, 106 (38%) had at least three exacerbations and 89 (49%) required hospitalisation at least once. 107 (27%) of 400 reported daily sputum. Lung function was normal in 133 (59%) of 227 patients but with considerable between-group differences (median forced vital capacity Z score ranged from –0·12 [–0·95 to 0·65] in Australia to –1·54 [–3·39 to –0·04] in South Africa). We found marked inter-group differences in lower airway bacteria (<em>Haemophilus influenzae</em> in 56 [70%] of 80 patients in Australia to three [16%] of 19 in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine; <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> in eight [24%] of 34 in South Africa to one [5%] in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine), treatment (long-term azithromycin for 47 [50%] of 94 in Greece–Italy–Spain to 15 [19%] of 79 in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine; and inhaled corticosteroids for 48 [61%] in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine to 28 [22%] of 126 in Australia), and radiographic markers (cystic bronchiectasis in 49 [45%] of 109 in South Africa to three [2%] of 126 in Australia [p&lt;0·0001]). In quality-of-care standard markers, the recommended panel of investigations was done in 66–95% of patients; only 78 (47%) of 167 saw a paediatric physiotherapist in the previous 12 months.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Our study presents the first internationally derived paediatric registry data highlighting geographical variations in cause, lung function, bacteriology, and treatment in children and young people with bronchiectasis, as well as the need to improve quality care.<h3>Funding</h3>None.","PeriodicalId":51307,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":32.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First results from the international paediatric bronchiectasis registry (Child-BEAR-Net Registry) describing multicountry variations in childhood bronchiectasis and its management: a multicentre, cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Laura Garriga-Grimau, Ahmad Kantar, Keith Grimwood, Charl Verwey, Refiloe Masekela, Diane Gray, Ameena Goga, Bulent Karadag, Ela Erdem Eralp, Yasemin Gokdemir, Konstantinos Douros, Dafni Moriki, Elpiniki Kartsiouni, Antonio Moreno-Galdó, Laura Petrarca, Fabio Midulla, Maria Elisa Di Cicco, Oleksandr Mazulov, Sonila Boriçi, Jeanette Boyd, Efthymia Alexopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2213-2600(25)00089-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Despite increasing recognition of bronchiectasis worldwide, there are no multicountry data characterising bronchiectasis in children. We aimed to describe clinical features, comparing inter-country and regional variations, and describe indices of overall quality-of-care standards assessed against international consensus statements for children and young people with bronchiectasis.<h3>Methods</h3>Child-BEAR-Net is an international collaborative paediatric bronchiectasis network across several continents. Using our International Paediatric Bronchiectasis Registry data from secondary and tertiary hospitals across eight countries, we conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study of all patients in the registry younger than 18 years diagnosed with bronchiectasis. Data were grouped into four geographical regions: Australia, South Africa, Greece–Italy–Spain, and Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine. Patients with cystic fibrosis or a history of heart or lung transplantation were excluded. We assessed baseline clinical characteristics, causes, treatments, and quality-of-care indicators, and compared findings across regions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for between-group comparisons.<h3>Findings</h3>Between June 1, 2020, and Feb 9, 2024, 408 patients were enrolled (median age at diagnosis 6·0 years [IQR 3·2–9·0]; 229 (56%) male and 179 (44%) female patients). The most common underlying causes were post-infection (127 [31%]), primary and secondary immunodeficiencies (79 [19%]), and known genetic disorders (55 [13%]). Common comorbidities included asthma (70 [17%]), otorhinolaryngeal disorders (58 [14%]), and congenital major airway malformation (51 [13%]). In the previous 12 months, 106 (38%) had at least three exacerbations and 89 (49%) required hospitalisation at least once. 107 (27%) of 400 reported daily sputum. Lung function was normal in 133 (59%) of 227 patients but with considerable between-group differences (median forced vital capacity Z score ranged from –0·12 [–0·95 to 0·65] in Australia to –1·54 [–3·39 to –0·04] in South Africa). We found marked inter-group differences in lower airway bacteria (<em>Haemophilus influenzae</em> in 56 [70%] of 80 patients in Australia to three [16%] of 19 in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine; <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> in eight [24%] of 34 in South Africa to one [5%] in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine), treatment (long-term azithromycin for 47 [50%] of 94 in Greece–Italy–Spain to 15 [19%] of 79 in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine; and inhaled corticosteroids for 48 [61%] in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine to 28 [22%] of 126 in Australia), and radiographic markers (cystic bronchiectasis in 49 [45%] of 109 in South Africa to three [2%] of 126 in Australia [p&lt;0·0001]). In quality-of-care standard markers, the recommended panel of investigations was done in 66–95% of patients; only 78 (47%) of 167 saw a paediatric physiotherapist in the previous 12 months.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Our study presents the first internationally derived paediatric registry data highlighting geographical variations in cause, lung function, bacteriology, and treatment in children and young people with bronchiectasis, as well as the need to improve quality care.<h3>Funding</h3>None.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":32.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(25)00089-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(25)00089-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管世界范围内对支气管扩张的认识越来越多,但没有多国的儿童支气管扩张的特征数据。我们的目的是描述临床特征,比较国家间和地区差异,并描述针对儿童和青少年支气管扩张症的国际共识声明评估的总体护理质量标准指标。child - bear - net是一个跨越几大洲的国际儿科支气管扩张合作网络。利用来自8个国家的二级和三级医院的国际儿科支气管扩张登记数据,我们对登记的所有18岁以下诊断为支气管扩张的患者进行了一项多中心、横断面队列研究。数据被分成四个地理区域:澳大利亚、南非、希腊-意大利-西班牙和阿尔巴尼亚-土耳其-乌克兰。排除囊性纤维化或有心脏或肺移植史的患者。我们评估了基线临床特征、病因、治疗方法和护理质量指标,并比较了各地区的发现。数据分析采用描述性统计和非参数检验进行组间比较。在2020年6月1日至2024年2月9日期间,纳入408例患者(诊断时中位年龄为6.0岁[IQR 3.2 - 9.0];229例(56%)男性,179例(44%)女性。最常见的潜在原因是感染后(127例[31%])、原发性和继发性免疫缺陷(79例[19%])和已知的遗传疾病(55例[13%])。常见的合并症包括哮喘(70例[17%])、耳鼻喉疾病(58例[14%])和先天性主要气道畸形(51例[13%])。在过去的12个月中,106例(38%)至少有3次病情恶化,89例(49%)至少住院一次。400例患者中有107例(27%)报告每日咳痰。227例患者中有133例(59%)肺功能正常,但组间差异较大(澳大利亚的中位用力肺活量Z评分为- 0.12[- 0.95 ~ 0.65],南非的中位用力肺活量Z评分为- 1.54[- 3.39 ~ - 0.04])。我们发现下气道细菌的组间差异显著(澳大利亚80例患者中56例[70%]感染流感嗜血杆菌,阿尔巴尼亚- rkiye -乌克兰19例患者中3例[16%]感染流感嗜血杆菌;铜绿假单胞菌:南非34例中有8例(24%),阿尔巴尼亚- rkiye -乌克兰1例(5%)),治疗(长期阿奇霉素:希腊-意大利-西班牙94例中有47例(50%),阿尔巴尼亚- rkiye -乌克兰79例中有15例(19%);阿尔巴尼亚-乌克兰病例48例(61%),rkije -乌克兰病例28例(22%),澳大利亚126例患者中有28例(22%))和放射学标志物(南非109例患者中有49例(45%)出现囊性支气管扩张,澳大利亚126例患者中有3例(2%)出现囊性支气管扩张[p<; 0.0001])。在护理质量标准指标中,推荐的调查小组在66-95%的患者中进行;167名儿童中只有78名(47%)在过去12个月内看过儿科物理治疗师。我们的研究提出了第一个国际衍生的儿科登记数据,突出了儿童和青少年支气管扩张的病因、肺功能、细菌学和治疗的地理差异,以及提高质量护理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First results from the international paediatric bronchiectasis registry (Child-BEAR-Net Registry) describing multicountry variations in childhood bronchiectasis and its management: a multicentre, cross-sectional study

Background

Despite increasing recognition of bronchiectasis worldwide, there are no multicountry data characterising bronchiectasis in children. We aimed to describe clinical features, comparing inter-country and regional variations, and describe indices of overall quality-of-care standards assessed against international consensus statements for children and young people with bronchiectasis.

Methods

Child-BEAR-Net is an international collaborative paediatric bronchiectasis network across several continents. Using our International Paediatric Bronchiectasis Registry data from secondary and tertiary hospitals across eight countries, we conducted a multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study of all patients in the registry younger than 18 years diagnosed with bronchiectasis. Data were grouped into four geographical regions: Australia, South Africa, Greece–Italy–Spain, and Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine. Patients with cystic fibrosis or a history of heart or lung transplantation were excluded. We assessed baseline clinical characteristics, causes, treatments, and quality-of-care indicators, and compared findings across regions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for between-group comparisons.

Findings

Between June 1, 2020, and Feb 9, 2024, 408 patients were enrolled (median age at diagnosis 6·0 years [IQR 3·2–9·0]; 229 (56%) male and 179 (44%) female patients). The most common underlying causes were post-infection (127 [31%]), primary and secondary immunodeficiencies (79 [19%]), and known genetic disorders (55 [13%]). Common comorbidities included asthma (70 [17%]), otorhinolaryngeal disorders (58 [14%]), and congenital major airway malformation (51 [13%]). In the previous 12 months, 106 (38%) had at least three exacerbations and 89 (49%) required hospitalisation at least once. 107 (27%) of 400 reported daily sputum. Lung function was normal in 133 (59%) of 227 patients but with considerable between-group differences (median forced vital capacity Z score ranged from –0·12 [–0·95 to 0·65] in Australia to –1·54 [–3·39 to –0·04] in South Africa). We found marked inter-group differences in lower airway bacteria (Haemophilus influenzae in 56 [70%] of 80 patients in Australia to three [16%] of 19 in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine; Pseudomonas aeruginosa in eight [24%] of 34 in South Africa to one [5%] in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine), treatment (long-term azithromycin for 47 [50%] of 94 in Greece–Italy–Spain to 15 [19%] of 79 in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine; and inhaled corticosteroids for 48 [61%] in Albania–Türkiye–Ukraine to 28 [22%] of 126 in Australia), and radiographic markers (cystic bronchiectasis in 49 [45%] of 109 in South Africa to three [2%] of 126 in Australia [p<0·0001]). In quality-of-care standard markers, the recommended panel of investigations was done in 66–95% of patients; only 78 (47%) of 167 saw a paediatric physiotherapist in the previous 12 months.

Interpretation

Our study presents the first internationally derived paediatric registry data highlighting geographical variations in cause, lung function, bacteriology, and treatment in children and young people with bronchiectasis, as well as the need to improve quality care.

Funding

None.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Lancet Respiratory Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
87.10
自引率
0.70%
发文量
572
期刊介绍: The Lancet Respiratory Medicine is a renowned journal specializing in respiratory medicine and critical care. Our publication features original research that aims to advocate for change or shed light on clinical practices in the field. Additionally, we provide informative reviews on various topics related to respiratory medicine and critical care, ensuring a comprehensive coverage of the subject. The journal covers a wide range of topics including but not limited to asthma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tobacco control, intensive care medicine, lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, pneumonia, sarcoidosis, sepsis, mesothelioma, sleep medicine, thoracic and reconstructive surgery, tuberculosis, palliative medicine, influenza, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary vascular disease, and respiratory infections. By encompassing such a broad spectrum of subjects, we strive to address the diverse needs and interests of our readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信