建筑声学中噪声影响预测的音质模型的建立

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Kuen Wai Ma , Cheuk Ming Mak , Hai Ming Wong
{"title":"建筑声学中噪声影响预测的音质模型的建立","authors":"Kuen Wai Ma ,&nbsp;Cheuk Ming Mak ,&nbsp;Hai Ming Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building acoustics is the science of controlling and predicting sounds in buildings, as well as studying the effects of environmental sound quality and noise impacts on building occupants. However, developing noise impact prediction remains a research challenge due to a huge variety in multidimensionally modeling of environmental sound quality. Researchers have recently revealed the three fundamental human perceptual dimensions of sound, called <em>Evaluation</em>, <em>Potency</em>, and <em>Activity</em> (<em>EPA</em>). This is the first study aimed at developing prediction models for the negative noise impacts (<em>O1</em>: <em>Discomfortable</em>, <em>O2</em>: <em>Annoying</em>, <em>O3</em>: <em>Stressful</em>, <em>O4</em>: <em>Unacceptable</em>, <em>O5</em>: <em>Averse</em>, <em>O6</em>: <em>Unsatisfying</em>) using the sound quality model (<em>EPA</em> model) in three approaches (holistic, subjective-synthesized, and pure-objective). A total of 582 jury listening tests were conducted on the recorded natural sounds, human sounds and mechanical sounds. The statistical analysis results validated the reliability of constructing <em>E</em>-, <em>P</em>-, <em>A</em>-, and <em>EPA</em>-scores in the <em>EPA</em> model. The holistic models (<em>O1</em>-<em>O6</em>-<em>In</em>) demonstrated the highest goodness-of-fit among the approaches. The subjective-synthesized models (<em>O1</em>-<em>O6</em>-<em>EPA</em>) were designed to integrate the perceptual influences of all fundamental perceptions without the notable drop in goodness-of-fit (−6.1 % to −14.7 %) as <em>EPA</em>-score was a significant predictor of all negative impacts. Compared with the models relying solely on the A-weighted, equivalent continuous sound pressure level (<em>L</em><sub>Aeq</sub>), the pure-objective models (<em>O1</em>-<em>O6-EPA</em><sub>pre</sub>) incorporating the predictive <em>EPA</em>-score (<em>EPA</em><sub>pre</sub>) demonstrated higher adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values (+24 % to +58 %). The results will be beneficial for future urban planning or building restoration, particularly in sustainable noise control considering environmental sound quality and noise impacts on building occupants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 113183"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a sound quality model for noise impact prediction in building acoustics\",\"authors\":\"Kuen Wai Ma ,&nbsp;Cheuk Ming Mak ,&nbsp;Hai Ming Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Building acoustics is the science of controlling and predicting sounds in buildings, as well as studying the effects of environmental sound quality and noise impacts on building occupants. However, developing noise impact prediction remains a research challenge due to a huge variety in multidimensionally modeling of environmental sound quality. Researchers have recently revealed the three fundamental human perceptual dimensions of sound, called <em>Evaluation</em>, <em>Potency</em>, and <em>Activity</em> (<em>EPA</em>). This is the first study aimed at developing prediction models for the negative noise impacts (<em>O1</em>: <em>Discomfortable</em>, <em>O2</em>: <em>Annoying</em>, <em>O3</em>: <em>Stressful</em>, <em>O4</em>: <em>Unacceptable</em>, <em>O5</em>: <em>Averse</em>, <em>O6</em>: <em>Unsatisfying</em>) using the sound quality model (<em>EPA</em> model) in three approaches (holistic, subjective-synthesized, and pure-objective). A total of 582 jury listening tests were conducted on the recorded natural sounds, human sounds and mechanical sounds. The statistical analysis results validated the reliability of constructing <em>E</em>-, <em>P</em>-, <em>A</em>-, and <em>EPA</em>-scores in the <em>EPA</em> model. The holistic models (<em>O1</em>-<em>O6</em>-<em>In</em>) demonstrated the highest goodness-of-fit among the approaches. The subjective-synthesized models (<em>O1</em>-<em>O6</em>-<em>EPA</em>) were designed to integrate the perceptual influences of all fundamental perceptions without the notable drop in goodness-of-fit (−6.1 % to −14.7 %) as <em>EPA</em>-score was a significant predictor of all negative impacts. Compared with the models relying solely on the A-weighted, equivalent continuous sound pressure level (<em>L</em><sub>Aeq</sub>), the pure-objective models (<em>O1</em>-<em>O6-EPA</em><sub>pre</sub>) incorporating the predictive <em>EPA</em>-score (<em>EPA</em><sub>pre</sub>) demonstrated higher adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values (+24 % to +58 %). The results will be beneficial for future urban planning or building restoration, particularly in sustainable noise control considering environmental sound quality and noise impacts on building occupants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of building engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225014202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225014202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑声学是一门控制和预测建筑物内声音,以及研究环境声质量和噪声对建筑物居住者影响的科学。然而,由于环境声质量的多维建模种类繁多,噪声影响预测的发展仍然是一个研究挑战。研究人员最近揭示了人类对声音的三个基本感知维度,即评价、效力和活动(EPA)。这是第一个研究旨在开发负面噪音影响的预测模型(O1:不舒服,O2:烦人,O3:压力,O4:不可接受,O5:厌恶,O6:不满意),使用音质模型(EPA模型)在三种方法(整体,主观合成和纯目标)。共有582个陪审团对录制的自然声、人声和机械声进行了听力测试。统计分析结果验证了在EPA模型中构建E-、P-、A-和EPA-得分的可靠性。整体模型(O1-O6-In)的拟合优度最高。主观合成模型(O1-O6-EPA)旨在整合所有基本感知的感知影响,而没有显着的拟合优度下降(-6.1%至-14.7%),因为epa评分是所有负面影响的重要预测因子。与单纯依赖a加权等效连续声压级(LAeq)的模型相比,结合预测epa评分(EPApre)的纯目标模型(O1-O6-EPApre)的调整R2值更高(+24% ~ +58%)。研究结果将有助于未来的城市规划或建筑物修复,特别是考虑环境声音质量和噪音对建筑物居住者的影响的可持续噪音控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a sound quality model for noise impact prediction in building acoustics
Building acoustics is the science of controlling and predicting sounds in buildings, as well as studying the effects of environmental sound quality and noise impacts on building occupants. However, developing noise impact prediction remains a research challenge due to a huge variety in multidimensionally modeling of environmental sound quality. Researchers have recently revealed the three fundamental human perceptual dimensions of sound, called Evaluation, Potency, and Activity (EPA). This is the first study aimed at developing prediction models for the negative noise impacts (O1: Discomfortable, O2: Annoying, O3: Stressful, O4: Unacceptable, O5: Averse, O6: Unsatisfying) using the sound quality model (EPA model) in three approaches (holistic, subjective-synthesized, and pure-objective). A total of 582 jury listening tests were conducted on the recorded natural sounds, human sounds and mechanical sounds. The statistical analysis results validated the reliability of constructing E-, P-, A-, and EPA-scores in the EPA model. The holistic models (O1-O6-In) demonstrated the highest goodness-of-fit among the approaches. The subjective-synthesized models (O1-O6-EPA) were designed to integrate the perceptual influences of all fundamental perceptions without the notable drop in goodness-of-fit (−6.1 % to −14.7 %) as EPA-score was a significant predictor of all negative impacts. Compared with the models relying solely on the A-weighted, equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq), the pure-objective models (O1-O6-EPApre) incorporating the predictive EPA-score (EPApre) demonstrated higher adjusted R2 values (+24 % to +58 %). The results will be beneficial for future urban planning or building restoration, particularly in sustainable noise control considering environmental sound quality and noise impacts on building occupants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信