Stephanie B. Oliveira MD, Julia D. Thomas BA, Conrad Cole MD, Michael Helmrath MD, Samuel Kocoshis MD, Paul W. Wales MD
{"title":"参与远程患者监测的儿童肠衰竭患者肠外营养断奶:一项描述性研究。","authors":"Stephanie B. Oliveira MD, Julia D. Thomas BA, Conrad Cole MD, Michael Helmrath MD, Samuel Kocoshis MD, Paul W. Wales MD","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) enhances patient surveillance. This study describes our initial experience with RPM in pediatric intestinal failure patients and its preliminary impact on parenteral nutrition (PN) reduction in an outpatient setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a descriptive cohort study on pediatric patients with intestinal failure receiving home PN and enrolled in an RPM program managed by our intestinal rehabilitation team. Initiated in March 2021, the study compared PN energy and volume reduction rates before and after RPM implementation. We calculated the rate of PN decrease per day and the time to achieve a 20% reduction in PN volume. Paired <i>t</i> tests were used for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at <i>P</i> < 0.05. The study received institutional review board approval.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen patients were included (52% male; mean age: 44 months). The most common etiology of short bowel syndrome was necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), with a mean residual small bowel length of 15.5% ± 12.5%. Post-RPM, there was a greater reduction in PN energy and volume (0.22 ± 0.28 and 0.17 ± 0.24) compared with pre-RPM (0.08 ± 0.10 and 0.07 ± 0.08), though not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.11 and <i>P</i> = 0.17). Time to achieve a 20% reduction in PN was shorter post RPM but not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.06 and <i>P</i> = 0.20 for energy and volume, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Remote patient monitoring appears safe for pediatric intestinal failure patients, with potential for higher PN reduction and shorter time to achieve it. Further research is needed to fully assess RPM's impact on this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","volume":"49 6","pages":"768-772"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpen.2784","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parenteral nutrition weaning in pediatric intestinal failure patients enrolled in remote patient monitoring: A descriptive study\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie B. Oliveira MD, Julia D. Thomas BA, Conrad Cole MD, Michael Helmrath MD, Samuel Kocoshis MD, Paul W. Wales MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpen.2784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Remote patient monitoring (RPM) enhances patient surveillance. This study describes our initial experience with RPM in pediatric intestinal failure patients and its preliminary impact on parenteral nutrition (PN) reduction in an outpatient setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed a descriptive cohort study on pediatric patients with intestinal failure receiving home PN and enrolled in an RPM program managed by our intestinal rehabilitation team. Initiated in March 2021, the study compared PN energy and volume reduction rates before and after RPM implementation. We calculated the rate of PN decrease per day and the time to achieve a 20% reduction in PN volume. Paired <i>t</i> tests were used for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at <i>P</i> < 0.05. The study received institutional review board approval.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventeen patients were included (52% male; mean age: 44 months). The most common etiology of short bowel syndrome was necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), with a mean residual small bowel length of 15.5% ± 12.5%. Post-RPM, there was a greater reduction in PN energy and volume (0.22 ± 0.28 and 0.17 ± 0.24) compared with pre-RPM (0.08 ± 0.10 and 0.07 ± 0.08), though not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.11 and <i>P</i> = 0.17). Time to achieve a 20% reduction in PN was shorter post RPM but not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.06 and <i>P</i> = 0.20 for energy and volume, respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Remote patient monitoring appears safe for pediatric intestinal failure patients, with potential for higher PN reduction and shorter time to achieve it. Further research is needed to fully assess RPM's impact on this population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"49 6\",\"pages\":\"768-772\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpen.2784\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2784\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2784","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parenteral nutrition weaning in pediatric intestinal failure patients enrolled in remote patient monitoring: A descriptive study
Background
Remote patient monitoring (RPM) enhances patient surveillance. This study describes our initial experience with RPM in pediatric intestinal failure patients and its preliminary impact on parenteral nutrition (PN) reduction in an outpatient setting.
Methods
We performed a descriptive cohort study on pediatric patients with intestinal failure receiving home PN and enrolled in an RPM program managed by our intestinal rehabilitation team. Initiated in March 2021, the study compared PN energy and volume reduction rates before and after RPM implementation. We calculated the rate of PN decrease per day and the time to achieve a 20% reduction in PN volume. Paired t tests were used for comparisons. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The study received institutional review board approval.
Results
Seventeen patients were included (52% male; mean age: 44 months). The most common etiology of short bowel syndrome was necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), with a mean residual small bowel length of 15.5% ± 12.5%. Post-RPM, there was a greater reduction in PN energy and volume (0.22 ± 0.28 and 0.17 ± 0.24) compared with pre-RPM (0.08 ± 0.10 and 0.07 ± 0.08), though not statistically significant (P = 0.11 and P = 0.17). Time to achieve a 20% reduction in PN was shorter post RPM but not statistically significant (P = 0.06 and P = 0.20 for energy and volume, respectively).
Conclusion
Remote patient monitoring appears safe for pediatric intestinal failure patients, with potential for higher PN reduction and shorter time to achieve it. Further research is needed to fully assess RPM's impact on this population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of nutrition and metabolic support. It publishes original peer-reviewed studies that define the cutting edge of basic and clinical research in the field. It explores the science of optimizing the care of patients receiving enteral or IV therapies. Also included: reviews, techniques, brief reports, case reports, and abstracts.