机械通气急性心力衰竭患者呼气末正压高与低的比较:HELP-AHF试验的基本原理和设计。

International journal of heart failure Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.36628/ijhf.2025.0014
Junho Hyun, In-Cheol Kim, Ah-Ram Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Sung-Cheol Yun, Min-Seok Kim
{"title":"机械通气急性心力衰竭患者呼气末正压高与低的比较:HELP-AHF试验的基本原理和设计。","authors":"Junho Hyun, In-Cheol Kim, Ah-Ram Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Sung-Cheol Yun, Min-Seok Kim","doi":"10.36628/ijhf.2025.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) often necessitates invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) due to respiratory failure. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a critical component in MV management; however, the optimal PEEP level for patients with ADHF remains unclear. The High vErsus Low Positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with Acute Heart Failure (HELP-AHF) trial is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of high versus low PEEP strategies in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with ADHF requiring MV within 24 hours of initiation will be randomized 1:1 to a high PEEP group (target: 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) or a low PEEP group (target: 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome is ventilator-free days at day 28. Key secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, vasoactive-inotropic support, and rates of heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation. Safety outcomes include hemodynamic instability requiring mechanical circulatory support, pulmonary complications, and weaning-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This HELP-AHF trial aims to provide valuable insights into optimal PEEP strategies in ADHF patients receiving invasive MV. Findings from this study have the potential to inform ventilatory management practices and improve outcomes in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04853563.</p>","PeriodicalId":101410,"journal":{"name":"International journal of heart failure","volume":"7 2","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of High Versus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Heart Failure: Rationale and Design of the HELP-AHF Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Junho Hyun, In-Cheol Kim, Ah-Ram Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Sung-Cheol Yun, Min-Seok Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.36628/ijhf.2025.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) often necessitates invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) due to respiratory failure. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a critical component in MV management; however, the optimal PEEP level for patients with ADHF remains unclear. The High vErsus Low Positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with Acute Heart Failure (HELP-AHF) trial is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of high versus low PEEP strategies in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with ADHF requiring MV within 24 hours of initiation will be randomized 1:1 to a high PEEP group (target: 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) or a low PEEP group (target: 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome is ventilator-free days at day 28. Key secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, vasoactive-inotropic support, and rates of heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation. Safety outcomes include hemodynamic instability requiring mechanical circulatory support, pulmonary complications, and weaning-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This HELP-AHF trial aims to provide valuable insights into optimal PEEP strategies in ADHF patients receiving invasive MV. Findings from this study have the potential to inform ventilatory management practices and improve outcomes in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04853563.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of heart failure\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"79-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160051/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of heart failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2025.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of heart failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2025.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)通常由于呼吸衰竭而需要有创机械通气(MV)。呼气末正压(PEEP)是中压治疗的重要组成部分;然而,ADHF患者的最佳PEEP水平仍不清楚。机械通气急性心力衰竭患者呼气末正压高vs低(HELP-AHF)试验是一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照研究,旨在比较高呼气末正压与低呼气末正压策略在该人群中的有效性和安全性。方法:共有120例在24小时内需要MV的ADHF患者将被1:1随机分配到高PEEP组(目标:10 cmH2O)或低PEEP组(目标:3 cmH2O)。结果:主要终点为第28天无呼吸机天数。关键的次要结局包括住院死亡率、重症监护病房和住院时间、血管活性-肌力支持、心脏移植或左心室辅助装置植入率。安全性结果包括需要机械循环支持的血流动力学不稳定、肺部并发症和脱机相关不良事件。结论:这项HELP-AHF试验旨在为ADHF患者接受有创MV的最佳PEEP策略提供有价值的见解。本研究的发现有可能为这一高危人群的通气管理实践提供信息,并改善预后。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04853563。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of High Versus Low Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Heart Failure: Rationale and Design of the HELP-AHF Trial.

Background and objectives: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) often necessitates invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) due to respiratory failure. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a critical component in MV management; however, the optimal PEEP level for patients with ADHF remains unclear. The High vErsus Low Positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with Acute Heart Failure (HELP-AHF) trial is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of high versus low PEEP strategies in this population.

Methods: A total of 120 patients with ADHF requiring MV within 24 hours of initiation will be randomized 1:1 to a high PEEP group (target: 10 cmH2O) or a low PEEP group (target: 3 cmH2O).

Results: The primary outcome is ventilator-free days at day 28. Key secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, vasoactive-inotropic support, and rates of heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation. Safety outcomes include hemodynamic instability requiring mechanical circulatory support, pulmonary complications, and weaning-related adverse events.

Conclusions: This HELP-AHF trial aims to provide valuable insights into optimal PEEP strategies in ADHF patients receiving invasive MV. Findings from this study have the potential to inform ventilatory management practices and improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04853563.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信