在临床实践中,与三联治疗作为转换策略相比,多替格拉韦和拉米夫定复合治疗的有效性和安全性。

IF 2.2
Diego Cecchini, Edgardo Bottaro, Brenda Bacelar, Ángeles Tisné, Claudia Migazzi, Macarena Roel, Maximiliano Bergman, Isabel Cassetti
{"title":"在临床实践中,与三联治疗作为转换策略相比,多替格拉韦和拉米夫定复合治疗的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Diego Cecchini, Edgardo Bottaro, Brenda Bacelar, Ángeles Tisné, Claudia Migazzi, Macarena Roel, Maximiliano Bergman, Isabel Cassetti","doi":"10.37201/req/030.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dolutegravir plus lamivudine (DTG/3TC) dual therapy has demonstrated efficacy in HIV treatment, but access remains challenging in Latin America. Argentina approved a generic co-packaged DTG+3TC presentation to improve accessibility. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of co-packed DTG/3TC compared to DTG-based triple therapy in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study conducted between October 2019 and November 2023 at a reference HIV center in Argentina. Treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH) with viral suppression who switched to either co-packaged DTG/3TC or DTG-based triple therapy were included. Primary outcomes included persistence, virologic suppression rates (VSR), and safety at 6, 12, and 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 599 PLWH, 245 (41%) switched to dual therapy and 354 (59%) to triple therapy. Persistence rates for dual therapy at 6, 12, and 18 months were 99%, 100% and 98%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 97%, respectively. VSR for dual therapy were 99%, 98% and 99%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 98% at the same timepoints. Adverse event rates were low in both groups: dual therapy (0.5%, 0%, 0.8% at 6, 12, 18 months) and triple therapy (1.2%, 0.7%, 0.4% at 6, 12, 18 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-packaged DTG/3TC demonstrated high persistence and virologic suppression rates with a favorable safety profile in clinical practice. Its effectiveness and safety were comparable to DTG-based triple therapy, supporting its use as a cost-effective alternative for treatment-experienced PLWH in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94198,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","volume":" ","pages":"386-393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with co-packaged dolutegravir and lamivudine compared to triple therapy as switching strategy in clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Diego Cecchini, Edgardo Bottaro, Brenda Bacelar, Ángeles Tisné, Claudia Migazzi, Macarena Roel, Maximiliano Bergman, Isabel Cassetti\",\"doi\":\"10.37201/req/030.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dolutegravir plus lamivudine (DTG/3TC) dual therapy has demonstrated efficacy in HIV treatment, but access remains challenging in Latin America. Argentina approved a generic co-packaged DTG+3TC presentation to improve accessibility. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of co-packed DTG/3TC compared to DTG-based triple therapy in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study conducted between October 2019 and November 2023 at a reference HIV center in Argentina. Treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH) with viral suppression who switched to either co-packaged DTG/3TC or DTG-based triple therapy were included. Primary outcomes included persistence, virologic suppression rates (VSR), and safety at 6, 12, and 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 599 PLWH, 245 (41%) switched to dual therapy and 354 (59%) to triple therapy. Persistence rates for dual therapy at 6, 12, and 18 months were 99%, 100% and 98%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 97%, respectively. VSR for dual therapy were 99%, 98% and 99%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 98% at the same timepoints. Adverse event rates were low in both groups: dual therapy (0.5%, 0%, 0.8% at 6, 12, 18 months) and triple therapy (1.2%, 0.7%, 0.4% at 6, 12, 18 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-packaged DTG/3TC demonstrated high persistence and virologic suppression rates with a favorable safety profile in clinical practice. Its effectiveness and safety were comparable to DTG-based triple therapy, supporting its use as a cost-effective alternative for treatment-experienced PLWH in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"386-393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/030.2025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/030.2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Dolutegravir +拉米夫定(DTG/3TC)双重疗法已被证明对HIV治疗有效,但在拉丁美洲获得仍然具有挑战性。阿根廷批准了一种通用的共包装DTG+3TC演示,以改善可及性。本研究在临床实践中比较了DTG/3TC共包装与DTG为基础的三联疗法的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:2019年10月至2023年11月在阿根廷HIV参考中心进行的回顾性观察队列研究。治疗经验丰富的病毒抑制HIV感染者(PLWH)转换为共包装DTG/3TC或基于DTG的三联治疗。主要结局包括6、12和18个月时的持久性、病毒学抑制率(VSR)和安全性。结果:在599例PLWH中,245例(41%)转为双药治疗,354例(59%)转为三联治疗。双重治疗在6、12和18个月的持续率分别为99%、100%和98%;三联疗法:分别为99%、97%和97%。双重治疗的VSR分别为99%、98%和99%;三联疗法:同一时间点的99%,97%和98%。两组不良事件发生率均较低:双重治疗(6、12、18个月时分别为0.5%、0%、0.8%)和三联治疗(6、12、18个月时分别为1.2%、0.7%、0.4%)。结论:共包装DTG/3TC在临床实践中具有较高的持久性和病毒学抑制率,且具有良好的安全性。其有效性和安全性与基于dtg的三联疗法相当,支持其作为资源有限环境中治疗经验丰富的PLWH的成本效益替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with co-packaged dolutegravir and lamivudine compared to triple therapy as switching strategy in clinical practice.

Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with co-packaged dolutegravir and lamivudine compared to triple therapy as switching strategy in clinical practice.

Effectiveness and safety of dual therapy with co-packaged dolutegravir and lamivudine compared to triple therapy as switching strategy in clinical practice.

Introduction: Dolutegravir plus lamivudine (DTG/3TC) dual therapy has demonstrated efficacy in HIV treatment, but access remains challenging in Latin America. Argentina approved a generic co-packaged DTG+3TC presentation to improve accessibility. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of co-packed DTG/3TC compared to DTG-based triple therapy in clinical practice.

Materials and methods: A retrospective observational cohort study conducted between October 2019 and November 2023 at a reference HIV center in Argentina. Treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH) with viral suppression who switched to either co-packaged DTG/3TC or DTG-based triple therapy were included. Primary outcomes included persistence, virologic suppression rates (VSR), and safety at 6, 12, and 18 months.

Results: Of 599 PLWH, 245 (41%) switched to dual therapy and 354 (59%) to triple therapy. Persistence rates for dual therapy at 6, 12, and 18 months were 99%, 100% and 98%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 97%, respectively. VSR for dual therapy were 99%, 98% and 99%; for triple therapy: 99%, 97% and 98% at the same timepoints. Adverse event rates were low in both groups: dual therapy (0.5%, 0%, 0.8% at 6, 12, 18 months) and triple therapy (1.2%, 0.7%, 0.4% at 6, 12, 18 months).

Conclusions: Co-packaged DTG/3TC demonstrated high persistence and virologic suppression rates with a favorable safety profile in clinical practice. Its effectiveness and safety were comparable to DTG-based triple therapy, supporting its use as a cost-effective alternative for treatment-experienced PLWH in resource-limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信