利用光容积脉搏波仪对危重病人进行连续监测——通往微创ICU监测之路。

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1605020
João Rosinhas, Rui Malheiro, João Tiago Pimenta, Ricardo Sá, Francisco Serdoura, José-Artur Paiva
{"title":"利用光容积脉搏波仪对危重病人进行连续监测——通往微创ICU监测之路。","authors":"João Rosinhas, Rui Malheiro, João Tiago Pimenta, Ricardo Sá, Francisco Serdoura, José-Artur Paiva","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1605020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intensive Care Medicine is based on continuous timely monitoring of physiological variables to guide modulation of therapy. This monitoring is often invasive, but there is a trend for the adoption of non-invasive devices, already largely used in wards and homecare, to reduce risk of device-associated side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a non-invasive equipment (Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B) in the assessment of blood pressure, heart rate, temperature and oxygen saturation in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective cohort study developed in an adult ICU admitting patients for level 3 and 2 of care compared the Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B with the ICU standard monitoring, namely continuous electrocardiogram, invasive arterial blood pressure through arterial catheter, pulse oximeter and central thermometer. Concordance was assessed using the Bland-Altman test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients were included in the study. The number of time-points included for comparison between the two monitoring strategies were more than 50,000 in pulse and heart rate, around 40,000 in oxygen saturation and body temperature and 1,200 in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Bias for heart rate and pulse were -1.73 and -0.77, respectively. The limits of agreement were between -14.90 and 11.33, for heart rate, and -14.25 and 12.71, for pulse. Small biases were also estimated for oxygen saturation (0.21), with limits of agreement between -6.97 and 7.39, and body temperature (0.58), with limits between -1.12 and 2.47. Concordance was low for diastolic and systolic blood pressure, with bias of 5.18 and -11.27, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B reaches good levels of concordance compared to traditional ICU monitoring for heart and pulse rates and may be a valuable solution for their less invasive monitoring, with promising results for future operationalization for oxygen saturation and body temperature. Concordance is low for blood pressure, meaning the device is currently unsuitable for use with that purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1605020"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous monitoring of critically ill patients using photoplethysmography-the road to a less invasive ICU monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"João Rosinhas, Rui Malheiro, João Tiago Pimenta, Ricardo Sá, Francisco Serdoura, José-Artur Paiva\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1605020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intensive Care Medicine is based on continuous timely monitoring of physiological variables to guide modulation of therapy. This monitoring is often invasive, but there is a trend for the adoption of non-invasive devices, already largely used in wards and homecare, to reduce risk of device-associated side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a non-invasive equipment (Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B) in the assessment of blood pressure, heart rate, temperature and oxygen saturation in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective cohort study developed in an adult ICU admitting patients for level 3 and 2 of care compared the Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B with the ICU standard monitoring, namely continuous electrocardiogram, invasive arterial blood pressure through arterial catheter, pulse oximeter and central thermometer. Concordance was assessed using the Bland-Altman test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients were included in the study. The number of time-points included for comparison between the two monitoring strategies were more than 50,000 in pulse and heart rate, around 40,000 in oxygen saturation and body temperature and 1,200 in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Bias for heart rate and pulse were -1.73 and -0.77, respectively. The limits of agreement were between -14.90 and 11.33, for heart rate, and -14.25 and 12.71, for pulse. Small biases were also estimated for oxygen saturation (0.21), with limits of agreement between -6.97 and 7.39, and body temperature (0.58), with limits between -1.12 and 2.47. Concordance was low for diastolic and systolic blood pressure, with bias of 5.18 and -11.27, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B reaches good levels of concordance compared to traditional ICU monitoring for heart and pulse rates and may be a valuable solution for their less invasive monitoring, with promising results for future operationalization for oxygen saturation and body temperature. Concordance is low for blood pressure, meaning the device is currently unsuitable for use with that purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1605020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162652/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1605020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1605020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重症监护医学是基于对生理变量的持续及时监测来指导治疗的调节。这种监测通常是侵入性的,但有一种趋势是采用非侵入性设备,已经在病房和家庭护理中大量使用,以减少设备相关副作用的风险。本研究的目的是评估无创设备(Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B)在评估ICU重症患者血压、心率、体温和血氧饱和度方面的准确性。方法:本前瞻性队列研究采用Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B与ICU标准监测(连续心电图、动脉导管有创动脉血压、脉搏血氧仪和中心体温计)进行比较。采用Bland-Altman检验评估一致性。结果:19例患者纳入研究。用于比较两种监测策略的时间点数量包括脉搏和心率超过50,000个,氧饱和度和体温约40,000个,收缩压和舒张压1,200个。心率和脉搏偏差分别为-1.73和-0.77。心率的一致性限制在-14.90到11.33之间,脉搏的一致性限制在-14.25到12.71之间。氧饱和度(0.21)和体温(0.58)的偏差也较小,两者的误差范围在-6.97和7.39之间,误差范围在-1.12和2.47之间。舒张压和收缩压的一致性较低,偏差分别为5.18和-11.27。结论:与传统的ICU心脏和脉搏监测相比,Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B达到了良好的一致性水平,可能是一种有价值的无创监测解决方案,在未来的血氧饱和度和体温监测中有很好的应用前景。协和是低血压,这意味着该设备目前不适合用于此目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous monitoring of critically ill patients using photoplethysmography-the road to a less invasive ICU monitoring.

Introduction: Intensive Care Medicine is based on continuous timely monitoring of physiological variables to guide modulation of therapy. This monitoring is often invasive, but there is a trend for the adoption of non-invasive devices, already largely used in wards and homecare, to reduce risk of device-associated side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a non-invasive equipment (Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B) in the assessment of blood pressure, heart rate, temperature and oxygen saturation in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU.

Method: This prospective cohort study developed in an adult ICU admitting patients for level 3 and 2 of care compared the Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B with the ICU standard monitoring, namely continuous electrocardiogram, invasive arterial blood pressure through arterial catheter, pulse oximeter and central thermometer. Concordance was assessed using the Bland-Altman test.

Results: Nineteen patients were included in the study. The number of time-points included for comparison between the two monitoring strategies were more than 50,000 in pulse and heart rate, around 40,000 in oxygen saturation and body temperature and 1,200 in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Bias for heart rate and pulse were -1.73 and -0.77, respectively. The limits of agreement were between -14.90 and 11.33, for heart rate, and -14.25 and 12.71, for pulse. Small biases were also estimated for oxygen saturation (0.21), with limits of agreement between -6.97 and 7.39, and body temperature (0.58), with limits between -1.12 and 2.47. Concordance was low for diastolic and systolic blood pressure, with bias of 5.18 and -11.27, respectively.

Conclusions: Corsano Cardiowatch 287-2B reaches good levels of concordance compared to traditional ICU monitoring for heart and pulse rates and may be a valuable solution for their less invasive monitoring, with promising results for future operationalization for oxygen saturation and body temperature. Concordance is low for blood pressure, meaning the device is currently unsuitable for use with that purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信