人工智能在临床决策支持和不良事件预测中的应用。

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1403047
S P Oei, T H G F Bakkes, M Mischi, R A Bouwman, R J G van Sloun, S Turco
{"title":"人工智能在临床决策支持和不良事件预测中的应用。","authors":"S P Oei, T H G F Bakkes, M Mischi, R A Bouwman, R J G van Sloun, S Turco","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1403047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review focuses on integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare, particularly for predicting adverse events, which holds potential in clinical decision support (CDS) but also presents significant challenges. Biases in data acquisition, such as population shifts and data scarcity, threaten the generalizability of AI-based CDS algorithms across different healthcare centers. Techniques like resampling and data augmentation are crucial for addressing biases, along with external validation to mitigate population bias. Moreover, biases can emerge during AI training, leading to underfitting or overfitting, necessitating regularization techniques for balancing model complexity and generalizability. The lack of interpretability in AI models poses trust and transparency issues, advocating for transparent algorithms and requiring rigorous testing on specific hospital populations before implementation. Additionally, emphasizing human judgment alongside AI integration is essential to mitigate the risks of deskilling healthcare practitioners. Ongoing evaluation processes and adjustments to regulatory frameworks are crucial for ensuring the ethical, safe, and effective use of AI in CDS, highlighting the need for meticulous attention to data quality, preprocessing, model training, interpretability, and ethical considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1403047"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support and the prediction of adverse events.\",\"authors\":\"S P Oei, T H G F Bakkes, M Mischi, R A Bouwman, R J G van Sloun, S Turco\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1403047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review focuses on integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare, particularly for predicting adverse events, which holds potential in clinical decision support (CDS) but also presents significant challenges. Biases in data acquisition, such as population shifts and data scarcity, threaten the generalizability of AI-based CDS algorithms across different healthcare centers. Techniques like resampling and data augmentation are crucial for addressing biases, along with external validation to mitigate population bias. Moreover, biases can emerge during AI training, leading to underfitting or overfitting, necessitating regularization techniques for balancing model complexity and generalizability. The lack of interpretability in AI models poses trust and transparency issues, advocating for transparent algorithms and requiring rigorous testing on specific hospital populations before implementation. Additionally, emphasizing human judgment alongside AI integration is essential to mitigate the risks of deskilling healthcare practitioners. Ongoing evaluation processes and adjustments to regulatory frameworks are crucial for ensuring the ethical, safe, and effective use of AI in CDS, highlighting the need for meticulous attention to data quality, preprocessing, model training, interpretability, and ethical considerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1403047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162700/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1403047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1403047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述的重点是将人工智能(AI)整合到医疗保健中,特别是用于预测不良事件,这在临床决策支持(CDS)中具有潜力,但也存在重大挑战。数据获取中的偏差,如人口变化和数据稀缺性,威胁到基于人工智能的CDS算法在不同医疗中心的通用性。重采样和数据增强等技术对于解决偏差至关重要,同时还需要外部验证来减轻总体偏差。此外,在人工智能训练过程中可能会出现偏差,导致欠拟合或过拟合,需要正则化技术来平衡模型的复杂性和泛化性。人工智能模型缺乏可解释性带来了信任和透明度问题,提倡透明算法,并要求在实施前对特定医院人群进行严格测试。此外,在人工智能整合的同时强调人类的判断,对于减轻医疗从业人员去技能化的风险至关重要。持续的评估过程和对监管框架的调整对于确保人工智能在CDS中的道德、安全和有效使用至关重要,突出了对数据质量、预处理、模型训练、可解释性和道德考虑的细致关注的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support and the prediction of adverse events.

This review focuses on integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare, particularly for predicting adverse events, which holds potential in clinical decision support (CDS) but also presents significant challenges. Biases in data acquisition, such as population shifts and data scarcity, threaten the generalizability of AI-based CDS algorithms across different healthcare centers. Techniques like resampling and data augmentation are crucial for addressing biases, along with external validation to mitigate population bias. Moreover, biases can emerge during AI training, leading to underfitting or overfitting, necessitating regularization techniques for balancing model complexity and generalizability. The lack of interpretability in AI models poses trust and transparency issues, advocating for transparent algorithms and requiring rigorous testing on specific hospital populations before implementation. Additionally, emphasizing human judgment alongside AI integration is essential to mitigate the risks of deskilling healthcare practitioners. Ongoing evaluation processes and adjustments to regulatory frameworks are crucial for ensuring the ethical, safe, and effective use of AI in CDS, highlighting the need for meticulous attention to data quality, preprocessing, model training, interpretability, and ethical considerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信