竖脊肌平面阻滞治疗心脏手术后疼痛疗效的meta分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bhushan Sandeep PhD , Xin Huang MD , Fenglin Jiang MD , Han Cheng MD , Yuan Li MD , Zongwei Xiao PhD
{"title":"竖脊肌平面阻滞治疗心脏手术后疼痛疗效的meta分析。","authors":"Bhushan Sandeep PhD ,&nbsp;Xin Huang MD ,&nbsp;Fenglin Jiang MD ,&nbsp;Han Cheng MD ,&nbsp;Yuan Li MD ,&nbsp;Zongwei Xiao PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiac surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid-related morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in adult cardiac surgery. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (1,612 patients) were included. Primary outcomes revealed no significant difference in 24-hour postoperative coughing pain scores between ESPB and control groups (MD 0.12; 95 % CI:0.26 to 0.50; <em>P</em> = 0.54). However, ESPB demonstrated significant reductions in coughing and resting pain scores at 48 h (MD -0.60; 95 % CI:0.81to-0.38; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001) and 72 h (MD -0.67; 95 % CI:1.02 to-0.33; <em>P</em> = 0.0001), alongside reduced 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -2.04; 95 % CI:2.46 to-1.61; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001) and shorter mechanical ventilation duration (MD -26.53 minutes; 95 % CI:41.78 to-11.27; <em>P</em> = 0.0007). No differences were observed in ICU/hospital stays or surgical/anesthesia durations. Subgroup analyses highlighted variability in continuous versus single-shot ESPB techniques. High heterogeneity (I² &gt;50 %) and moderate-to-low GRADE evidence underline the need for standardized protocols. ESPB shows promise in enhancing recovery by reducing opioid use and late-phase pain, though further high-quality trials are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":"50 8","pages":"Article 103098"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of erector spinae plane block efficacy in managing postoperative pain following cardiac surgery\",\"authors\":\"Bhushan Sandeep PhD ,&nbsp;Xin Huang MD ,&nbsp;Fenglin Jiang MD ,&nbsp;Han Cheng MD ,&nbsp;Yuan Li MD ,&nbsp;Zongwei Xiao PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cardiac surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid-related morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in adult cardiac surgery. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (1,612 patients) were included. Primary outcomes revealed no significant difference in 24-hour postoperative coughing pain scores between ESPB and control groups (MD 0.12; 95 % CI:0.26 to 0.50; <em>P</em> = 0.54). However, ESPB demonstrated significant reductions in coughing and resting pain scores at 48 h (MD -0.60; 95 % CI:0.81to-0.38; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001) and 72 h (MD -0.67; 95 % CI:1.02 to-0.33; <em>P</em> = 0.0001), alongside reduced 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -2.04; 95 % CI:2.46 to-1.61; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001) and shorter mechanical ventilation duration (MD -26.53 minutes; 95 % CI:41.78 to-11.27; <em>P</em> = 0.0007). No differences were observed in ICU/hospital stays or surgical/anesthesia durations. Subgroup analyses highlighted variability in continuous versus single-shot ESPB techniques. High heterogeneity (I² &gt;50 %) and moderate-to-low GRADE evidence underline the need for standardized protocols. ESPB shows promise in enhancing recovery by reducing opioid use and late-phase pain, though further high-quality trials are warranted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 103098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280625001203\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280625001203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏手术伴有明显的术后疼痛,需要有效的多模式镇痛来减少阿片类药物相关的发病率。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)在成人心脏手术中的镇痛效果。纳入23项随机对照试验(1,612例患者)。主要结果显示,ESPB组与对照组术后24小时咳嗽疼痛评分无显著差异(MD 0.12;95% CI: -0.26 ~ 0.50;P = 0.54)。然而,ESPB在48小时时显示咳嗽和静息疼痛评分显著降低(MD -0.60;95% CI: -0.81 ~ 0.38;P50%)和中低GRADE证据强调了标准化方案的必要性。ESPB有望通过减少阿片类药物的使用和晚期疼痛来促进康复,但需要进一步的高质量试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-analysis of erector spinae plane block efficacy in managing postoperative pain following cardiac surgery
Cardiac surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid-related morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in adult cardiac surgery. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (1,612 patients) were included. Primary outcomes revealed no significant difference in 24-hour postoperative coughing pain scores between ESPB and control groups (MD 0.12; 95 % CI:0.26 to 0.50; P = 0.54). However, ESPB demonstrated significant reductions in coughing and resting pain scores at 48 h (MD -0.60; 95 % CI:0.81to-0.38; P < 0.00001) and 72 h (MD -0.67; 95 % CI:1.02 to-0.33; P = 0.0001), alongside reduced 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -2.04; 95 % CI:2.46 to-1.61; P < 0.00001) and shorter mechanical ventilation duration (MD -26.53 minutes; 95 % CI:41.78 to-11.27; P = 0.0007). No differences were observed in ICU/hospital stays or surgical/anesthesia durations. Subgroup analyses highlighted variability in continuous versus single-shot ESPB techniques. High heterogeneity (I² >50 %) and moderate-to-low GRADE evidence underline the need for standardized protocols. ESPB shows promise in enhancing recovery by reducing opioid use and late-phase pain, though further high-quality trials are warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cardiology
Current Problems in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
392
审稿时长
6 days
期刊介绍: Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信