{"title":"竖脊肌平面阻滞治疗心脏手术后疼痛疗效的meta分析。","authors":"Bhushan Sandeep PhD , Xin Huang MD , Fenglin Jiang MD , Han Cheng MD , Yuan Li MD , Zongwei Xiao PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiac surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid-related morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in adult cardiac surgery. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (1,612 patients) were included. Primary outcomes revealed no significant difference in 24-hour postoperative coughing pain scores between ESPB and control groups (MD 0.12; 95 % CI:0.26 to 0.50; <em>P</em> = 0.54). However, ESPB demonstrated significant reductions in coughing and resting pain scores at 48 h (MD -0.60; 95 % CI:0.81to-0.38; <em>P</em> < 0.00001) and 72 h (MD -0.67; 95 % CI:1.02 to-0.33; <em>P</em> = 0.0001), alongside reduced 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -2.04; 95 % CI:2.46 to-1.61; <em>P</em> < 0.00001) and shorter mechanical ventilation duration (MD -26.53 minutes; 95 % CI:41.78 to-11.27; <em>P</em> = 0.0007). No differences were observed in ICU/hospital stays or surgical/anesthesia durations. Subgroup analyses highlighted variability in continuous versus single-shot ESPB techniques. High heterogeneity (I² >50 %) and moderate-to-low GRADE evidence underline the need for standardized protocols. ESPB shows promise in enhancing recovery by reducing opioid use and late-phase pain, though further high-quality trials are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":"50 8","pages":"Article 103098"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of erector spinae plane block efficacy in managing postoperative pain following cardiac surgery\",\"authors\":\"Bhushan Sandeep PhD , Xin Huang MD , Fenglin Jiang MD , Han Cheng MD , Yuan Li MD , Zongwei Xiao PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cardiac surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid-related morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in adult cardiac surgery. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (1,612 patients) were included. Primary outcomes revealed no significant difference in 24-hour postoperative coughing pain scores between ESPB and control groups (MD 0.12; 95 % CI:0.26 to 0.50; <em>P</em> = 0.54). However, ESPB demonstrated significant reductions in coughing and resting pain scores at 48 h (MD -0.60; 95 % CI:0.81to-0.38; <em>P</em> < 0.00001) and 72 h (MD -0.67; 95 % CI:1.02 to-0.33; <em>P</em> = 0.0001), alongside reduced 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -2.04; 95 % CI:2.46 to-1.61; <em>P</em> < 0.00001) and shorter mechanical ventilation duration (MD -26.53 minutes; 95 % CI:41.78 to-11.27; <em>P</em> = 0.0007). No differences were observed in ICU/hospital stays or surgical/anesthesia durations. Subgroup analyses highlighted variability in continuous versus single-shot ESPB techniques. High heterogeneity (I² >50 %) and moderate-to-low GRADE evidence underline the need for standardized protocols. ESPB shows promise in enhancing recovery by reducing opioid use and late-phase pain, though further high-quality trials are warranted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 103098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280625001203\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280625001203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meta-analysis of erector spinae plane block efficacy in managing postoperative pain following cardiac surgery
Cardiac surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid-related morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in adult cardiac surgery. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials (1,612 patients) were included. Primary outcomes revealed no significant difference in 24-hour postoperative coughing pain scores between ESPB and control groups (MD 0.12; 95 % CI:0.26 to 0.50; P = 0.54). However, ESPB demonstrated significant reductions in coughing and resting pain scores at 48 h (MD -0.60; 95 % CI:0.81to-0.38; P < 0.00001) and 72 h (MD -0.67; 95 % CI:1.02 to-0.33; P = 0.0001), alongside reduced 24-hour morphine consumption (MD -2.04; 95 % CI:2.46 to-1.61; P < 0.00001) and shorter mechanical ventilation duration (MD -26.53 minutes; 95 % CI:41.78 to-11.27; P = 0.0007). No differences were observed in ICU/hospital stays or surgical/anesthesia durations. Subgroup analyses highlighted variability in continuous versus single-shot ESPB techniques. High heterogeneity (I² >50 %) and moderate-to-low GRADE evidence underline the need for standardized protocols. ESPB shows promise in enhancing recovery by reducing opioid use and late-phase pain, though further high-quality trials are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.