{"title":"宗教性与矛盾性别歧视的关系:系统回顾与元分析。","authors":"Jurand Sobiecki, Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka","doi":"10.5114/cipp/190893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore and analyze the existing research on the relationship between religiosity and two forms of ambivalent sexism: benevolent and hostile. A narrative synthesis approach and meta-analysis based on Fisher's z-transformed correlation coefficients were used to summarize the findings. The findings are reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The findings suggest that religiosity is associated positively with both forms of ambivalent sexism. There was a stronger positive correlation between religiosity and benevolent sexism (<i>z</i> = .29, 95% CI [.26; .33]) than between religiosity and hostile sexism (<i>z</i> = .19, 95% CI [.13; .25]). However, the relationship varied significantly across studies, suggesting moderating roles of religious affiliation and gender. The findings highlight the need for more nuanced and intersectional approaches. Empirical models which will allow a better understanding of this relationship are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":"13 2","pages":"67-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between religiosity and ambivalent sexism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jurand Sobiecki, Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/cipp/190893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore and analyze the existing research on the relationship between religiosity and two forms of ambivalent sexism: benevolent and hostile. A narrative synthesis approach and meta-analysis based on Fisher's z-transformed correlation coefficients were used to summarize the findings. The findings are reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The findings suggest that religiosity is associated positively with both forms of ambivalent sexism. There was a stronger positive correlation between religiosity and benevolent sexism (<i>z</i> = .29, 95% CI [.26; .33]) than between religiosity and hostile sexism (<i>z</i> = .19, 95% CI [.13; .25]). However, the relationship varied significantly across studies, suggesting moderating roles of religious affiliation and gender. The findings highlight the need for more nuanced and intersectional approaches. Empirical models which will allow a better understanding of this relationship are proposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"67-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/190893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/190893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统回顾与荟萃分析的目的是探索和分析宗教信仰与两种形式的矛盾性别歧视之间关系的现有研究:仁慈和敌意。采用叙事综合方法和基于Fisher z变换相关系数的元分析来总结研究结果。研究结果按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行报告。研究结果表明,宗教信仰与两种形式的矛盾性别歧视呈正相关。宗教虔诚度与善意性别歧视之间存在较强的正相关(z = 0.29, 95% CI [.26;.33])高于宗教信仰与敌对性别歧视之间的差异(z = .19, 95% CI [.13;0。25)然而,不同研究之间的关系差异很大,表明宗教信仰和性别的调节作用。研究结果强调需要更细致和交叉的方法。提出了可以更好地理解这种关系的经验模型。
The relationship between religiosity and ambivalent sexism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore and analyze the existing research on the relationship between religiosity and two forms of ambivalent sexism: benevolent and hostile. A narrative synthesis approach and meta-analysis based on Fisher's z-transformed correlation coefficients were used to summarize the findings. The findings are reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The findings suggest that religiosity is associated positively with both forms of ambivalent sexism. There was a stronger positive correlation between religiosity and benevolent sexism (z = .29, 95% CI [.26; .33]) than between religiosity and hostile sexism (z = .19, 95% CI [.13; .25]). However, the relationship varied significantly across studies, suggesting moderating roles of religious affiliation and gender. The findings highlight the need for more nuanced and intersectional approaches. Empirical models which will allow a better understanding of this relationship are proposed.